Cargando…

Component mechanisms of executive function in schizophrenia and their contribution to functional outcomes

OBJECTIVE: In schizophrenia, scores reflecting deficits in different cognitive processes are strongly correlated, making it difficult to establish a solid relationship between different cognitive mechanisms and other features of this disorder. The objective of this study was to explore whether three...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berberian, Arthur A., Gadelha, Ary, Dias, Natália M., Mecca, Tatiana P., Comfort, William E., Bressan, Rodrigo A., Lacerda, Acioly T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30365670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0021
_version_ 1783457421319995392
author Berberian, Arthur A.
Gadelha, Ary
Dias, Natália M.
Mecca, Tatiana P.
Comfort, William E.
Bressan, Rodrigo A.
Lacerda, Acioly T.
author_facet Berberian, Arthur A.
Gadelha, Ary
Dias, Natália M.
Mecca, Tatiana P.
Comfort, William E.
Bressan, Rodrigo A.
Lacerda, Acioly T.
author_sort Berberian, Arthur A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In schizophrenia, scores reflecting deficits in different cognitive processes are strongly correlated, making it difficult to establish a solid relationship between different cognitive mechanisms and other features of this disorder. The objective of this study was to explore whether three frequently postulated executive functions (updating, shifting, and inhibition) could be compared between groups and considered independently in terms of their respective roles in functional outcome. METHODS: This study relied on confirmatory factor analysis of schizophrenia patients (n=141) and healthy controls (n=119). The main analyses examined the degree to which three executive functions (updating, set-shifting, and inhibition) could be separated in schizophrenia and compared this model among groups. Structural equation modeling analysis was also performed to examine the extent to which executive function components contribute to functional outcome in schizophrenia. RESULTS: Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis with unconstrained model parameters indicated that the full three-factor model may fit the data in both groups (χ(2) = 61.48, degrees of freedom = 34, p < 0.001, comparative fit index = 0.95; standardized root mean square residual = 0.037; root mean square error of approximation = 0.04; Akaike’s information criteria = 169.49; normed fit index = 0.90), although there was also a good data fit for the patient group with a two-factor model. In the patient group, structural equation modeling suggested that shifting and (principally) updating were associated with the general measure of functional outcome (regression path coefficients: 0.34, p < 0.005; 0.39, p < 0.005, respectively), although when combined the mechanisms fail to contribute. CONCLUSION: This data suggests that the factor structure may be similar but not identical between groups, and both updating and shifting may play an important role in functional outcome in schizophrenia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6781696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67816962019-10-25 Component mechanisms of executive function in schizophrenia and their contribution to functional outcomes Berberian, Arthur A. Gadelha, Ary Dias, Natália M. Mecca, Tatiana P. Comfort, William E. Bressan, Rodrigo A. Lacerda, Acioly T. Braz J Psychiatry Original Article OBJECTIVE: In schizophrenia, scores reflecting deficits in different cognitive processes are strongly correlated, making it difficult to establish a solid relationship between different cognitive mechanisms and other features of this disorder. The objective of this study was to explore whether three frequently postulated executive functions (updating, shifting, and inhibition) could be compared between groups and considered independently in terms of their respective roles in functional outcome. METHODS: This study relied on confirmatory factor analysis of schizophrenia patients (n=141) and healthy controls (n=119). The main analyses examined the degree to which three executive functions (updating, set-shifting, and inhibition) could be separated in schizophrenia and compared this model among groups. Structural equation modeling analysis was also performed to examine the extent to which executive function components contribute to functional outcome in schizophrenia. RESULTS: Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis with unconstrained model parameters indicated that the full three-factor model may fit the data in both groups (χ(2) = 61.48, degrees of freedom = 34, p < 0.001, comparative fit index = 0.95; standardized root mean square residual = 0.037; root mean square error of approximation = 0.04; Akaike’s information criteria = 169.49; normed fit index = 0.90), although there was also a good data fit for the patient group with a two-factor model. In the patient group, structural equation modeling suggested that shifting and (principally) updating were associated with the general measure of functional outcome (regression path coefficients: 0.34, p < 0.005; 0.39, p < 0.005, respectively), although when combined the mechanisms fail to contribute. CONCLUSION: This data suggests that the factor structure may be similar but not identical between groups, and both updating and shifting may play an important role in functional outcome in schizophrenia. Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6781696/ /pubmed/30365670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0021 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Berberian, Arthur A.
Gadelha, Ary
Dias, Natália M.
Mecca, Tatiana P.
Comfort, William E.
Bressan, Rodrigo A.
Lacerda, Acioly T.
Component mechanisms of executive function in schizophrenia and their contribution to functional outcomes
title Component mechanisms of executive function in schizophrenia and their contribution to functional outcomes
title_full Component mechanisms of executive function in schizophrenia and their contribution to functional outcomes
title_fullStr Component mechanisms of executive function in schizophrenia and their contribution to functional outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Component mechanisms of executive function in schizophrenia and their contribution to functional outcomes
title_short Component mechanisms of executive function in schizophrenia and their contribution to functional outcomes
title_sort component mechanisms of executive function in schizophrenia and their contribution to functional outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30365670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0021
work_keys_str_mv AT berberianarthura componentmechanismsofexecutivefunctioninschizophreniaandtheircontributiontofunctionaloutcomes
AT gadelhaary componentmechanismsofexecutivefunctioninschizophreniaandtheircontributiontofunctionaloutcomes
AT diasnataliam componentmechanismsofexecutivefunctioninschizophreniaandtheircontributiontofunctionaloutcomes
AT meccatatianap componentmechanismsofexecutivefunctioninschizophreniaandtheircontributiontofunctionaloutcomes
AT comfortwilliame componentmechanismsofexecutivefunctioninschizophreniaandtheircontributiontofunctionaloutcomes
AT bressanrodrigoa componentmechanismsofexecutivefunctioninschizophreniaandtheircontributiontofunctionaloutcomes
AT lacerdaaciolyt componentmechanismsofexecutivefunctioninschizophreniaandtheircontributiontofunctionaloutcomes