Cargando…

Balanced Options for Access and Benefit-Sharing: Stakeholder Insights on Provider Country Legislation

The over-arching aim of the access and benefit-sharing (ABS) of genetic resources is to enable fair distribution of benefits between the users (such as universities and biotech companies) and providers (such as biodiversity rich countries) so as to both open the doors for innovation and create incen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sirakaya, Aysegul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632420
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01175
_version_ 1783457456966336512
author Sirakaya, Aysegul
author_facet Sirakaya, Aysegul
author_sort Sirakaya, Aysegul
collection PubMed
description The over-arching aim of the access and benefit-sharing (ABS) of genetic resources is to enable fair distribution of benefits between the users (such as universities and biotech companies) and providers (such as biodiversity rich countries) so as to both open the doors for innovation and create incentives for biodiversity conservation. Access to genetic resources is crucial for research related to conservation of plant genetic resources as well as R&D for agricultural products and evolved crops that can attain to the new weather conditions climate change brings. Therefore, access to genetic resources in general as well as benefit-sharing from that access is a key element for sustainable development in order to secure research as well as environmental sustainability and resource availability. ABS is currently a rapidly developing and evolving field that is shaped by each and every implementation of the Parties. This means that the national implementation of the Parties determine how ABS goals are realised and how ABS principles find form within regulatory mechanisms. These principles are found in international legal documents such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) as well as Nagoya Protocol. Additionally, decisions and guidelines drafted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity shape these principles that are then to be fulfilled by the Parties when drafting their ABS laws by means of implementing regulatory mechanisms that comply with the international law. This article reviews 20 provider country’s ABS frameworks as well as one regional law with the aim of identifying the common regulatory mechanisms that find place in these legal texts. This descriptive approach is then followed by an empirical comparative analysis through semi-structured stakeholder interviews in order to identify the most beneficial regulatory mechanisms according to ABS experts that belong in four different stakeholder groups (provider countries, academic users, industrial users and collections)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6781883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67818832019-10-18 Balanced Options for Access and Benefit-Sharing: Stakeholder Insights on Provider Country Legislation Sirakaya, Aysegul Front Plant Sci Plant Science The over-arching aim of the access and benefit-sharing (ABS) of genetic resources is to enable fair distribution of benefits between the users (such as universities and biotech companies) and providers (such as biodiversity rich countries) so as to both open the doors for innovation and create incentives for biodiversity conservation. Access to genetic resources is crucial for research related to conservation of plant genetic resources as well as R&D for agricultural products and evolved crops that can attain to the new weather conditions climate change brings. Therefore, access to genetic resources in general as well as benefit-sharing from that access is a key element for sustainable development in order to secure research as well as environmental sustainability and resource availability. ABS is currently a rapidly developing and evolving field that is shaped by each and every implementation of the Parties. This means that the national implementation of the Parties determine how ABS goals are realised and how ABS principles find form within regulatory mechanisms. These principles are found in international legal documents such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) as well as Nagoya Protocol. Additionally, decisions and guidelines drafted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity shape these principles that are then to be fulfilled by the Parties when drafting their ABS laws by means of implementing regulatory mechanisms that comply with the international law. This article reviews 20 provider country’s ABS frameworks as well as one regional law with the aim of identifying the common regulatory mechanisms that find place in these legal texts. This descriptive approach is then followed by an empirical comparative analysis through semi-structured stakeholder interviews in order to identify the most beneficial regulatory mechanisms according to ABS experts that belong in four different stakeholder groups (provider countries, academic users, industrial users and collections) Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6781883/ /pubmed/31632420 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01175 Text en Copyright © 2019 Sirakaya http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Sirakaya, Aysegul
Balanced Options for Access and Benefit-Sharing: Stakeholder Insights on Provider Country Legislation
title Balanced Options for Access and Benefit-Sharing: Stakeholder Insights on Provider Country Legislation
title_full Balanced Options for Access and Benefit-Sharing: Stakeholder Insights on Provider Country Legislation
title_fullStr Balanced Options for Access and Benefit-Sharing: Stakeholder Insights on Provider Country Legislation
title_full_unstemmed Balanced Options for Access and Benefit-Sharing: Stakeholder Insights on Provider Country Legislation
title_short Balanced Options for Access and Benefit-Sharing: Stakeholder Insights on Provider Country Legislation
title_sort balanced options for access and benefit-sharing: stakeholder insights on provider country legislation
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632420
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01175
work_keys_str_mv AT sirakayaaysegul balancedoptionsforaccessandbenefitsharingstakeholderinsightsonprovidercountrylegislation