Cargando…
The risk of arterial thromboembolic events after cancer diagnosis
BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies have reported an association between cancer and arterial thromboembolic event (ATE) risk. OBJECTIVES: We sought to confirm this in a prospective cohort with adjudicated outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated participants enrolled in the REGARDS (REasons for Geographic and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12223 |
_version_ | 1783457461417541632 |
---|---|
author | Navi, Babak B. Howard, George Howard, Virginia J. Zhao, Hong Judd, Suzanne E. Elkind, Mitchell S. V. Iadecola, Costantino DeAngelis, Lisa M. Kamel, Hooman Okin, Peter M. Gilchrist, Susan Soliman, Elsayed Z. Cushman, Mary Safford, Monika Muntner, Paul |
author_facet | Navi, Babak B. Howard, George Howard, Virginia J. Zhao, Hong Judd, Suzanne E. Elkind, Mitchell S. V. Iadecola, Costantino DeAngelis, Lisa M. Kamel, Hooman Okin, Peter M. Gilchrist, Susan Soliman, Elsayed Z. Cushman, Mary Safford, Monika Muntner, Paul |
author_sort | Navi, Babak B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies have reported an association between cancer and arterial thromboembolic event (ATE) risk. OBJECTIVES: We sought to confirm this in a prospective cohort with adjudicated outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated participants enrolled in the REGARDS (REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) study with Medicare coverage for 365 days before their baseline visit (2003‐2007). Medicare claims were used to identify new cancer diagnoses during follow‐up. Using incidence‐density sampling, participants who developed cancer were matched by age, sex, race, and education 1:4 to control participants who had not developed cancer. Participants were prospectively followed through 2015 for an expert‐adjudicated ATE, defined as acute myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke. Cox regression was performed to evaluate the association between incident cancer and subsequent ATE. RESULTS: In this analysis, 836 REGARDS participants with incident cancer were matched to 3339 control participants without cancer. In the 30 days after cancer diagnosis, 0.60% (n = 5) of the participants had an ATE; most of these events occurred near the time of cancer diagnosis. After adjustment for demographics, geographic region, and cardiovascular risk factors, compared to the noncancer controls, participants with incident cancer had an increased risk of ATE in the first 30 days after diagnosis (hazard ratio, 5.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.1‐15.9). There was no association between cancer diagnosis and ATE beyond 30 days. Cancers with known metastases and types considered high risk for venous thromboembolism had the strongest associations with ATE. CONCLUSIONS: Incident cancer is associated with an increased short‐term risk of ATE independent of vascular risk factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6781919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67819192019-10-17 The risk of arterial thromboembolic events after cancer diagnosis Navi, Babak B. Howard, George Howard, Virginia J. Zhao, Hong Judd, Suzanne E. Elkind, Mitchell S. V. Iadecola, Costantino DeAngelis, Lisa M. Kamel, Hooman Okin, Peter M. Gilchrist, Susan Soliman, Elsayed Z. Cushman, Mary Safford, Monika Muntner, Paul Res Pract Thromb Haemost Original Articles: Thrombosis BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies have reported an association between cancer and arterial thromboembolic event (ATE) risk. OBJECTIVES: We sought to confirm this in a prospective cohort with adjudicated outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated participants enrolled in the REGARDS (REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) study with Medicare coverage for 365 days before their baseline visit (2003‐2007). Medicare claims were used to identify new cancer diagnoses during follow‐up. Using incidence‐density sampling, participants who developed cancer were matched by age, sex, race, and education 1:4 to control participants who had not developed cancer. Participants were prospectively followed through 2015 for an expert‐adjudicated ATE, defined as acute myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke. Cox regression was performed to evaluate the association between incident cancer and subsequent ATE. RESULTS: In this analysis, 836 REGARDS participants with incident cancer were matched to 3339 control participants without cancer. In the 30 days after cancer diagnosis, 0.60% (n = 5) of the participants had an ATE; most of these events occurred near the time of cancer diagnosis. After adjustment for demographics, geographic region, and cardiovascular risk factors, compared to the noncancer controls, participants with incident cancer had an increased risk of ATE in the first 30 days after diagnosis (hazard ratio, 5.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.1‐15.9). There was no association between cancer diagnosis and ATE beyond 30 days. Cancers with known metastases and types considered high risk for venous thromboembolism had the strongest associations with ATE. CONCLUSIONS: Incident cancer is associated with an increased short‐term risk of ATE independent of vascular risk factors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6781919/ /pubmed/31624783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12223 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles: Thrombosis Navi, Babak B. Howard, George Howard, Virginia J. Zhao, Hong Judd, Suzanne E. Elkind, Mitchell S. V. Iadecola, Costantino DeAngelis, Lisa M. Kamel, Hooman Okin, Peter M. Gilchrist, Susan Soliman, Elsayed Z. Cushman, Mary Safford, Monika Muntner, Paul The risk of arterial thromboembolic events after cancer diagnosis |
title | The risk of arterial thromboembolic events after cancer diagnosis |
title_full | The risk of arterial thromboembolic events after cancer diagnosis |
title_fullStr | The risk of arterial thromboembolic events after cancer diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | The risk of arterial thromboembolic events after cancer diagnosis |
title_short | The risk of arterial thromboembolic events after cancer diagnosis |
title_sort | risk of arterial thromboembolic events after cancer diagnosis |
topic | Original Articles: Thrombosis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT navibabakb theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT howardgeorge theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT howardvirginiaj theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT zhaohong theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT juddsuzannee theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT elkindmitchellsv theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT iadecolacostantino theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT deangelislisam theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT kamelhooman theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT okinpeterm theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT gilchristsusan theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT solimanelsayedz theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT cushmanmary theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT saffordmonika theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT muntnerpaul theriskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT navibabakb riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT howardgeorge riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT howardvirginiaj riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT zhaohong riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT juddsuzannee riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT elkindmitchellsv riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT iadecolacostantino riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT deangelislisam riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT kamelhooman riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT okinpeterm riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT gilchristsusan riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT solimanelsayedz riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT cushmanmary riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT saffordmonika riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis AT muntnerpaul riskofarterialthromboemboliceventsaftercancerdiagnosis |