Cargando…

Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant

BACKGROUND: Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is classified in the antibody family that is recognized in antiphospholipid syndrome. Mixing tests are recommended for LA detection, and either a mixing test–specific cutoff (MTC) or index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) is used for the interpretation. Althoug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumano, Osamu, Moore, Gary W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12245
_version_ 1783457463893229568
author Kumano, Osamu
Moore, Gary W.
author_facet Kumano, Osamu
Moore, Gary W.
author_sort Kumano, Osamu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is classified in the antibody family that is recognized in antiphospholipid syndrome. Mixing tests are recommended for LA detection, and either a mixing test–specific cutoff (MTC) or index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) is used for the interpretation. Although we previously showed MTC had higher sensitivity for LA than ICA, there are few studies investigating specificity. OBJECTIVES: To investigate specificity of multiple activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and diluted Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) reagents for inhibitors using plasmas with non‐LA causes of prolonged clotting times, interpreted with MTC and ICA. METHODS: Seventy‐six factor‐deficient samples (either artificially prepared, hereditary deficiency, or warfarin), and 12 inhibitors (either coagulation factor inhibitors, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) were used. Samples were tested with 4 APTTs, 1 dilute APTT (dAPTT), and 2 dRVVT reagents, and all elevated screen ratios were followed up with mixing tests. Frequencies of corrected and not‐corrected results were calculated. RESULTS: The frequency of MTC and ICA corrected results, suggesting factor deficiency, were 5% to 43% and 79% to 100%, respectively, except for dAPTT, where MTC and ICA performed similarly. Frequencies of MTC and ICA not‐corrected results, suggesting inhibition, were 29% to 100% and 25% to 67%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that MTC has a tendency to generate not‐corrected mixing tests in factor‐deficient, warfarin, and other inhibitor samples, while ICA exhibited higher specificity. When we perform the mixing test and interpret the data, it is important to understand the characteristics of the indexes for maximizing the diagnostic potential of mixing test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6781930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67819302019-10-17 Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant Kumano, Osamu Moore, Gary W. Res Pract Thromb Haemost Original Articles: Thrombosis BACKGROUND: Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is classified in the antibody family that is recognized in antiphospholipid syndrome. Mixing tests are recommended for LA detection, and either a mixing test–specific cutoff (MTC) or index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) is used for the interpretation. Although we previously showed MTC had higher sensitivity for LA than ICA, there are few studies investigating specificity. OBJECTIVES: To investigate specificity of multiple activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and diluted Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) reagents for inhibitors using plasmas with non‐LA causes of prolonged clotting times, interpreted with MTC and ICA. METHODS: Seventy‐six factor‐deficient samples (either artificially prepared, hereditary deficiency, or warfarin), and 12 inhibitors (either coagulation factor inhibitors, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) were used. Samples were tested with 4 APTTs, 1 dilute APTT (dAPTT), and 2 dRVVT reagents, and all elevated screen ratios were followed up with mixing tests. Frequencies of corrected and not‐corrected results were calculated. RESULTS: The frequency of MTC and ICA corrected results, suggesting factor deficiency, were 5% to 43% and 79% to 100%, respectively, except for dAPTT, where MTC and ICA performed similarly. Frequencies of MTC and ICA not‐corrected results, suggesting inhibition, were 29% to 100% and 25% to 67%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that MTC has a tendency to generate not‐corrected mixing tests in factor‐deficient, warfarin, and other inhibitor samples, while ICA exhibited higher specificity. When we perform the mixing test and interpret the data, it is important to understand the characteristics of the indexes for maximizing the diagnostic potential of mixing test. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6781930/ /pubmed/31624789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12245 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles: Thrombosis
Kumano, Osamu
Moore, Gary W.
Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
title Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
title_full Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
title_fullStr Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
title_full_unstemmed Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
title_short Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
title_sort ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
topic Original Articles: Thrombosis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12245
work_keys_str_mv AT kumanoosamu rulingoutlupusanticoagulantswithmixingtestspecificcutoffassessmentandtheindexofcirculatinganticoagulant
AT mooregaryw rulingoutlupusanticoagulantswithmixingtestspecificcutoffassessmentandtheindexofcirculatinganticoagulant