Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations

Although all-ceramic crowns have excellent biocompatibility and esthetic appearance, chipping may occur. The mechanical properties of monolithic zirconia restorative material are superior to those of all-ceramic restorative materials, and chipping caused by chewing hard foods could be avoided. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Zhenyu, Zhao, Xinyi, Wang, Hui, Liu, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6783234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31577743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017385
_version_ 1783457526360047616
author Tang, Zhenyu
Zhao, Xinyi
Wang, Hui
Liu, Bin
author_facet Tang, Zhenyu
Zhao, Xinyi
Wang, Hui
Liu, Bin
author_sort Tang, Zhenyu
collection PubMed
description Although all-ceramic crowns have excellent biocompatibility and esthetic appearance, chipping may occur. The mechanical properties of monolithic zirconia restorative material are superior to those of all-ceramic restorative materials, and chipping caused by chewing hard foods could be avoided. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations. A total of 46 patients requiring posterior teeth restorations involving 49 teeth were treated with monolithic zirconia crown procedure. The treatment results were evaluated according to the modified California Dental Association criteria immediately after the procedure, and at 2, 24, 48, and 96 weeks after the procedure. The plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, crown marginal integrity, and attrition of the abutment teeth, antagonist teeth, corresponding contralateral teeth, and antagonist of the corresponding contralateral teeth were assessed. The patients were followed for up to 96 weeks. The marginal adaptation results of all 46 patients were evaluated as excellent, resulting in an excellent rate of 100%. Regarding the crown color match, only 3 cases (6.1%) were evaluated as acceptable. Marginal adaptation, anatomic form, crown margin integrity, color match, and gross fracture did not show significant differences compared with the different time points (P = .999). Surface texture at different time did not change significantly (P = .807). During the 96-week follow-up, 1 crack in the antagonist teeth was found in 1 patient. There were no significant differences in wear of the antagonist teeth at different time points (P = .972). The rate of “excellent” evaluation for crown restorations was 93.9% to 100%. The monolithic zirconia crown had no detectable adverse effects on the periodontal tissues, and the antagonist teeth attrition was small. Therefore, it has good potential in the clinical application of posterior teeth restorations in the short term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6783234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67832342019-11-13 Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations Tang, Zhenyu Zhao, Xinyi Wang, Hui Liu, Bin Medicine (Baltimore) 5900 Although all-ceramic crowns have excellent biocompatibility and esthetic appearance, chipping may occur. The mechanical properties of monolithic zirconia restorative material are superior to those of all-ceramic restorative materials, and chipping caused by chewing hard foods could be avoided. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations. A total of 46 patients requiring posterior teeth restorations involving 49 teeth were treated with monolithic zirconia crown procedure. The treatment results were evaluated according to the modified California Dental Association criteria immediately after the procedure, and at 2, 24, 48, and 96 weeks after the procedure. The plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, crown marginal integrity, and attrition of the abutment teeth, antagonist teeth, corresponding contralateral teeth, and antagonist of the corresponding contralateral teeth were assessed. The patients were followed for up to 96 weeks. The marginal adaptation results of all 46 patients were evaluated as excellent, resulting in an excellent rate of 100%. Regarding the crown color match, only 3 cases (6.1%) were evaluated as acceptable. Marginal adaptation, anatomic form, crown margin integrity, color match, and gross fracture did not show significant differences compared with the different time points (P = .999). Surface texture at different time did not change significantly (P = .807). During the 96-week follow-up, 1 crack in the antagonist teeth was found in 1 patient. There were no significant differences in wear of the antagonist teeth at different time points (P = .972). The rate of “excellent” evaluation for crown restorations was 93.9% to 100%. The monolithic zirconia crown had no detectable adverse effects on the periodontal tissues, and the antagonist teeth attrition was small. Therefore, it has good potential in the clinical application of posterior teeth restorations in the short term. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6783234/ /pubmed/31577743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017385 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5900
Tang, Zhenyu
Zhao, Xinyi
Wang, Hui
Liu, Bin
Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations
title Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations
title_full Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations
title_short Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations
title_sort clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations
topic 5900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6783234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31577743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017385
work_keys_str_mv AT tangzhenyu clinicalevaluationofmonolithiczirconiacrownsforposteriorteethrestorations
AT zhaoxinyi clinicalevaluationofmonolithiczirconiacrownsforposteriorteethrestorations
AT wanghui clinicalevaluationofmonolithiczirconiacrownsforposteriorteethrestorations
AT liubin clinicalevaluationofmonolithiczirconiacrownsforposteriorteethrestorations