Cargando…

The usefulness of stereotactic radiosurgery for recursive partitioning analysis class II/III lung cancer patients with brain metastases in the modern treatment era

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is considered the initial treatment for lung cancer patients with small-sized and limited number of brain metastases. The objective of this study was to assess clinical outcomes of SRS treatment using CyberKnife (CK) for recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class II/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ha, In Bong, Song, Jin Ho, Jeong, Bae Kwon, Jeong, Hojin, Lee, Yun Hee, Choi, Hoon Sik, Kang, Ki Mun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6783249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31577744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017390
_version_ 1783457530042646528
author Ha, In Bong
Song, Jin Ho
Jeong, Bae Kwon
Jeong, Hojin
Lee, Yun Hee
Choi, Hoon Sik
Kang, Ki Mun
author_facet Ha, In Bong
Song, Jin Ho
Jeong, Bae Kwon
Jeong, Hojin
Lee, Yun Hee
Choi, Hoon Sik
Kang, Ki Mun
author_sort Ha, In Bong
collection PubMed
description Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is considered the initial treatment for lung cancer patients with small-sized and limited number of brain metastases. The objective of this study was to assess clinical outcomes of SRS treatment using CyberKnife (CK) for recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class II/III patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases from lung cancer and identify which patients in the high RPA class could benefit from SRS. A total of 48 lung cancer patients who received CK-based SRS for their metastatic brain lesions from 2010 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiographic response was evaluated during follow-up period. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS) were calculated and prognostic variables associated with OS and IPFS were evaluated. Median follow-up time was 6.6 months. Local control rates at 6 months and 1-year following SRS were 98% and 92%, respectively. The median OS of all patients was 8 months. One-year and 2-year OS rates were 40.8% and 20.9%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, uncontrolled primary disease (P = .01) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or 3 (P = .001) were independent prognostic factors for inferior OS. These 2 factors were also significantly associated with inferior IPFS. In subgroup analysis according to RPA class, primary disease status was the only prognostic factor, showing statistically significant OS differences in both RPA class II and III (controlled vs uncontrolled: 41.1 vs 12.3 months in RPA class II, P = .03; 26.9 vs 4.1 months in RPA class III, P = .01). Our results indicated that SRS could be an effective treatment option for RPA class II/III patients with brain metastases from lung cancer in the modern treatment era. SRS might be particularly considered for patients with controlled primary disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6783249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67832492019-11-13 The usefulness of stereotactic radiosurgery for recursive partitioning analysis class II/III lung cancer patients with brain metastases in the modern treatment era Ha, In Bong Song, Jin Ho Jeong, Bae Kwon Jeong, Hojin Lee, Yun Hee Choi, Hoon Sik Kang, Ki Mun Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is considered the initial treatment for lung cancer patients with small-sized and limited number of brain metastases. The objective of this study was to assess clinical outcomes of SRS treatment using CyberKnife (CK) for recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class II/III patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases from lung cancer and identify which patients in the high RPA class could benefit from SRS. A total of 48 lung cancer patients who received CK-based SRS for their metastatic brain lesions from 2010 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiographic response was evaluated during follow-up period. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS) were calculated and prognostic variables associated with OS and IPFS were evaluated. Median follow-up time was 6.6 months. Local control rates at 6 months and 1-year following SRS were 98% and 92%, respectively. The median OS of all patients was 8 months. One-year and 2-year OS rates were 40.8% and 20.9%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, uncontrolled primary disease (P = .01) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or 3 (P = .001) were independent prognostic factors for inferior OS. These 2 factors were also significantly associated with inferior IPFS. In subgroup analysis according to RPA class, primary disease status was the only prognostic factor, showing statistically significant OS differences in both RPA class II and III (controlled vs uncontrolled: 41.1 vs 12.3 months in RPA class II, P = .03; 26.9 vs 4.1 months in RPA class III, P = .01). Our results indicated that SRS could be an effective treatment option for RPA class II/III patients with brain metastases from lung cancer in the modern treatment era. SRS might be particularly considered for patients with controlled primary disease. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6783249/ /pubmed/31577744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017390 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Ha, In Bong
Song, Jin Ho
Jeong, Bae Kwon
Jeong, Hojin
Lee, Yun Hee
Choi, Hoon Sik
Kang, Ki Mun
The usefulness of stereotactic radiosurgery for recursive partitioning analysis class II/III lung cancer patients with brain metastases in the modern treatment era
title The usefulness of stereotactic radiosurgery for recursive partitioning analysis class II/III lung cancer patients with brain metastases in the modern treatment era
title_full The usefulness of stereotactic radiosurgery for recursive partitioning analysis class II/III lung cancer patients with brain metastases in the modern treatment era
title_fullStr The usefulness of stereotactic radiosurgery for recursive partitioning analysis class II/III lung cancer patients with brain metastases in the modern treatment era
title_full_unstemmed The usefulness of stereotactic radiosurgery for recursive partitioning analysis class II/III lung cancer patients with brain metastases in the modern treatment era
title_short The usefulness of stereotactic radiosurgery for recursive partitioning analysis class II/III lung cancer patients with brain metastases in the modern treatment era
title_sort usefulness of stereotactic radiosurgery for recursive partitioning analysis class ii/iii lung cancer patients with brain metastases in the modern treatment era
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6783249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31577744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017390
work_keys_str_mv AT hainbong theusefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT songjinho theusefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT jeongbaekwon theusefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT jeonghojin theusefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT leeyunhee theusefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT choihoonsik theusefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT kangkimun theusefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT hainbong usefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT songjinho usefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT jeongbaekwon usefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT jeonghojin usefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT leeyunhee usefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT choihoonsik usefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera
AT kangkimun usefulnessofstereotacticradiosurgeryforrecursivepartitioninganalysisclassiiiiilungcancerpatientswithbrainmetastasesinthemoderntreatmentera