Cargando…
The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths
Pace bowlers must often perform extended bowling spells with maximal ball release speed (BRS) while targeting different delivery lengths when playing a multi-day match. This study investigated the effect of an eight over spell upon pace bowling biomechanics and performance at different delivery leng...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6783939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31480269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7090200 |
_version_ | 1783457638753763328 |
---|---|
author | Callaghan, Samuel J. Lockie, Robert G. Andrews, Warren A. Yu, Walter Chipchase, Robert F. Nimphius, Sophia |
author_facet | Callaghan, Samuel J. Lockie, Robert G. Andrews, Warren A. Yu, Walter Chipchase, Robert F. Nimphius, Sophia |
author_sort | Callaghan, Samuel J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pace bowlers must often perform extended bowling spells with maximal ball release speed (BRS) while targeting different delivery lengths when playing a multi-day match. This study investigated the effect of an eight over spell upon pace bowling biomechanics and performance at different delivery lengths. Nine male bowlers (age = 18.8 ± 1.7 years) completed an eight over spell, while targeting different lengths (short: 7–10 m, good: 4–7 m, full: 0–4 m from the batter’s stumps, respectively) in a randomized order. Trunk, knee and shoulder kinematics and ground reaction forces at front foot contact (FFC), as well as run-up velocity and BRS were measured. Paired sample t-tests (p ≤ 0.01), Hedges’ g effect sizes, and statistical parametrical mapping were used to assess differences between mean variables from the first and last three overs. No significant differences (p = 0.05–0.98) were found in any discrete or continuous variables, with the magnitude of difference being trivial-to-medium (g = 0.00–0.73) across all variables. Results suggest pace bowlers sustain BRS through a single eight over spell while tolerating the repeatedly high whole-body biomechanical loads as suggested by maintaining the kinematics or technique at the assessed joints during FFC. Practically, the findings are advantageous for bowling performance and support current bowling load monitoring practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6783939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67839392019-10-16 The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths Callaghan, Samuel J. Lockie, Robert G. Andrews, Warren A. Yu, Walter Chipchase, Robert F. Nimphius, Sophia Sports (Basel) Article Pace bowlers must often perform extended bowling spells with maximal ball release speed (BRS) while targeting different delivery lengths when playing a multi-day match. This study investigated the effect of an eight over spell upon pace bowling biomechanics and performance at different delivery lengths. Nine male bowlers (age = 18.8 ± 1.7 years) completed an eight over spell, while targeting different lengths (short: 7–10 m, good: 4–7 m, full: 0–4 m from the batter’s stumps, respectively) in a randomized order. Trunk, knee and shoulder kinematics and ground reaction forces at front foot contact (FFC), as well as run-up velocity and BRS were measured. Paired sample t-tests (p ≤ 0.01), Hedges’ g effect sizes, and statistical parametrical mapping were used to assess differences between mean variables from the first and last three overs. No significant differences (p = 0.05–0.98) were found in any discrete or continuous variables, with the magnitude of difference being trivial-to-medium (g = 0.00–0.73) across all variables. Results suggest pace bowlers sustain BRS through a single eight over spell while tolerating the repeatedly high whole-body biomechanical loads as suggested by maintaining the kinematics or technique at the assessed joints during FFC. Practically, the findings are advantageous for bowling performance and support current bowling load monitoring practices. MDPI 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6783939/ /pubmed/31480269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7090200 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Callaghan, Samuel J. Lockie, Robert G. Andrews, Warren A. Yu, Walter Chipchase, Robert F. Nimphius, Sophia The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths |
title | The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths |
title_full | The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths |
title_fullStr | The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths |
title_short | The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths |
title_sort | effects of an eight over cricket bowling spell upon pace bowling biomechanics and performance within different delivery lengths |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6783939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31480269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7090200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT callaghansamuelj theeffectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths AT lockierobertg theeffectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths AT andrewswarrena theeffectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths AT yuwalter theeffectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths AT chipchaserobertf theeffectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths AT nimphiussophia theeffectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths AT callaghansamuelj effectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths AT lockierobertg effectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths AT andrewswarrena effectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths AT yuwalter effectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths AT chipchaserobertf effectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths AT nimphiussophia effectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths |