Cargando…

The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths

Pace bowlers must often perform extended bowling spells with maximal ball release speed (BRS) while targeting different delivery lengths when playing a multi-day match. This study investigated the effect of an eight over spell upon pace bowling biomechanics and performance at different delivery leng...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Callaghan, Samuel J., Lockie, Robert G., Andrews, Warren A., Yu, Walter, Chipchase, Robert F., Nimphius, Sophia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6783939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31480269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7090200
_version_ 1783457638753763328
author Callaghan, Samuel J.
Lockie, Robert G.
Andrews, Warren A.
Yu, Walter
Chipchase, Robert F.
Nimphius, Sophia
author_facet Callaghan, Samuel J.
Lockie, Robert G.
Andrews, Warren A.
Yu, Walter
Chipchase, Robert F.
Nimphius, Sophia
author_sort Callaghan, Samuel J.
collection PubMed
description Pace bowlers must often perform extended bowling spells with maximal ball release speed (BRS) while targeting different delivery lengths when playing a multi-day match. This study investigated the effect of an eight over spell upon pace bowling biomechanics and performance at different delivery lengths. Nine male bowlers (age = 18.8 ± 1.7 years) completed an eight over spell, while targeting different lengths (short: 7–10 m, good: 4–7 m, full: 0–4 m from the batter’s stumps, respectively) in a randomized order. Trunk, knee and shoulder kinematics and ground reaction forces at front foot contact (FFC), as well as run-up velocity and BRS were measured. Paired sample t-tests (p ≤ 0.01), Hedges’ g effect sizes, and statistical parametrical mapping were used to assess differences between mean variables from the first and last three overs. No significant differences (p = 0.05–0.98) were found in any discrete or continuous variables, with the magnitude of difference being trivial-to-medium (g = 0.00–0.73) across all variables. Results suggest pace bowlers sustain BRS through a single eight over spell while tolerating the repeatedly high whole-body biomechanical loads as suggested by maintaining the kinematics or technique at the assessed joints during FFC. Practically, the findings are advantageous for bowling performance and support current bowling load monitoring practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6783939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67839392019-10-16 The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths Callaghan, Samuel J. Lockie, Robert G. Andrews, Warren A. Yu, Walter Chipchase, Robert F. Nimphius, Sophia Sports (Basel) Article Pace bowlers must often perform extended bowling spells with maximal ball release speed (BRS) while targeting different delivery lengths when playing a multi-day match. This study investigated the effect of an eight over spell upon pace bowling biomechanics and performance at different delivery lengths. Nine male bowlers (age = 18.8 ± 1.7 years) completed an eight over spell, while targeting different lengths (short: 7–10 m, good: 4–7 m, full: 0–4 m from the batter’s stumps, respectively) in a randomized order. Trunk, knee and shoulder kinematics and ground reaction forces at front foot contact (FFC), as well as run-up velocity and BRS were measured. Paired sample t-tests (p ≤ 0.01), Hedges’ g effect sizes, and statistical parametrical mapping were used to assess differences between mean variables from the first and last three overs. No significant differences (p = 0.05–0.98) were found in any discrete or continuous variables, with the magnitude of difference being trivial-to-medium (g = 0.00–0.73) across all variables. Results suggest pace bowlers sustain BRS through a single eight over spell while tolerating the repeatedly high whole-body biomechanical loads as suggested by maintaining the kinematics or technique at the assessed joints during FFC. Practically, the findings are advantageous for bowling performance and support current bowling load monitoring practices. MDPI 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6783939/ /pubmed/31480269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7090200 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Callaghan, Samuel J.
Lockie, Robert G.
Andrews, Warren A.
Yu, Walter
Chipchase, Robert F.
Nimphius, Sophia
The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths
title The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths
title_full The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths
title_fullStr The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths
title_short The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths
title_sort effects of an eight over cricket bowling spell upon pace bowling biomechanics and performance within different delivery lengths
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6783939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31480269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7090200
work_keys_str_mv AT callaghansamuelj theeffectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths
AT lockierobertg theeffectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths
AT andrewswarrena theeffectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths
AT yuwalter theeffectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths
AT chipchaserobertf theeffectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths
AT nimphiussophia theeffectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths
AT callaghansamuelj effectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths
AT lockierobertg effectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths
AT andrewswarrena effectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths
AT yuwalter effectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths
AT chipchaserobertf effectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths
AT nimphiussophia effectsofaneightovercricketbowlingspelluponpacebowlingbiomechanicsandperformancewithindifferentdeliverylengths