Cargando…

Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate

Biogas plants for waste treatment valorization are presently experiencing rapid development, especially in the agricultural sector, where large amounts of digestate are being generated. In this study, we investigated the effect of vibro-ball milling (VBM) for 5 and 30 min at a frequency of 20 s(−1)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monlau, Florian, Sambusiti, Cecilia, Barakat, Abdellatif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6783974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6030080
_version_ 1783457647605841920
author Monlau, Florian
Sambusiti, Cecilia
Barakat, Abdellatif
author_facet Monlau, Florian
Sambusiti, Cecilia
Barakat, Abdellatif
author_sort Monlau, Florian
collection PubMed
description Biogas plants for waste treatment valorization are presently experiencing rapid development, especially in the agricultural sector, where large amounts of digestate are being generated. In this study, we investigated the effect of vibro-ball milling (VBM) for 5 and 30 min at a frequency of 20 s(−1) on the physicochemical composition and enzymatic hydrolysis (30 U g(−1) total solids (TS) of cellulase and endo-1,4-xylanase from Trichoderma longibrachiatum) of dry and wet solid separated digestates from an agricultural biogas plant. We found that VBM of dry solid digestate improved the physical parameters as both the particle size and the crystallinity index (from 27% to 75%) were reduced. By contrast, VBM of wet solid digestate had a minimal effect on the physicochemical parameters. The best results in terms of cellulose and hemicelluloses hydrolysis were noted for 30 min of VBM of dry solid digestate, with hydrolysis yields of 64% and 85% for hemicelluloses and cellulose, respectively. At the condition of 30 min of VBM, bioethanol and methane production on the dry solid separated digestate was investigated. Bioethanol fermentation by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation resulted in an ethanol yield of 98 g(eth) kg(−1) TS (corresponding to 90% of the theoretical value) versus 19 g(eth) kg(−1) TS for raw solid digestate. Finally, in terms of methane potential, VBM for 30 min lead to an increase of the methane potential of 31% compared to untreated solid digestate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6783974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67839742019-10-16 Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate Monlau, Florian Sambusiti, Cecilia Barakat, Abdellatif Bioengineering (Basel) Article Biogas plants for waste treatment valorization are presently experiencing rapid development, especially in the agricultural sector, where large amounts of digestate are being generated. In this study, we investigated the effect of vibro-ball milling (VBM) for 5 and 30 min at a frequency of 20 s(−1) on the physicochemical composition and enzymatic hydrolysis (30 U g(−1) total solids (TS) of cellulase and endo-1,4-xylanase from Trichoderma longibrachiatum) of dry and wet solid separated digestates from an agricultural biogas plant. We found that VBM of dry solid digestate improved the physical parameters as both the particle size and the crystallinity index (from 27% to 75%) were reduced. By contrast, VBM of wet solid digestate had a minimal effect on the physicochemical parameters. The best results in terms of cellulose and hemicelluloses hydrolysis were noted for 30 min of VBM of dry solid digestate, with hydrolysis yields of 64% and 85% for hemicelluloses and cellulose, respectively. At the condition of 30 min of VBM, bioethanol and methane production on the dry solid separated digestate was investigated. Bioethanol fermentation by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation resulted in an ethanol yield of 98 g(eth) kg(−1) TS (corresponding to 90% of the theoretical value) versus 19 g(eth) kg(−1) TS for raw solid digestate. Finally, in terms of methane potential, VBM for 30 min lead to an increase of the methane potential of 31% compared to untreated solid digestate. MDPI 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6783974/ /pubmed/31500163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6030080 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Monlau, Florian
Sambusiti, Cecilia
Barakat, Abdellatif
Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate
title Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate
title_full Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate
title_fullStr Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate
title_short Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate
title_sort comparison of dry versus wet milling to improve bioethanol or methane recovery from solid anaerobic digestate
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6783974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6030080
work_keys_str_mv AT monlauflorian comparisonofdryversuswetmillingtoimprovebioethanolormethanerecoveryfromsolidanaerobicdigestate
AT sambusiticecilia comparisonofdryversuswetmillingtoimprovebioethanolormethanerecoveryfromsolidanaerobicdigestate
AT barakatabdellatif comparisonofdryversuswetmillingtoimprovebioethanolormethanerecoveryfromsolidanaerobicdigestate