Cargando…
Comparison of Transcriptome Differences in Soybean Response to Soybean Mosaic Virus under Normal Light and in the Shade
Shading in the intercropping system is a major abiotic factor which influences soybean growth and development, while soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is a biotic factor that limits the yield and quality of soybean. However, little is known about the defense response of soybean to SMV in the shade. Thus, i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31470502 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v11090793 |
_version_ | 1783457703174078464 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Lei Shang, Jing Wang, Wenming Du, Junbo Li, Kai Wu, Xiaoling Yu, Liang Liu, Chunyan Khaskheli, Muhammad Ibrahim Yang, Wenyu |
author_facet | Zhang, Lei Shang, Jing Wang, Wenming Du, Junbo Li, Kai Wu, Xiaoling Yu, Liang Liu, Chunyan Khaskheli, Muhammad Ibrahim Yang, Wenyu |
author_sort | Zhang, Lei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Shading in the intercropping system is a major abiotic factor which influences soybean growth and development, while soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is a biotic factor that limits the yield and quality of soybean. However, little is known about the defense response of soybean to SMV in the shade. Thus, in the current study, both intensity and quality (red:far-red, R:FR) of the light were changed to simulate the shaded environment and comparative transcriptome analysis was performed. Morphologically, plant growth was inhibited by SMV, which decreased 35.93% of plant height and 8.97% of stem diameter in the shade. A total of 3548 and 4319 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in soybean plants infected with SMV under normal light and in the shade. Enrichment analysis showed that the plant defense-related genes were upregulated under normal light but downregulated in the shade. Pathways that were repressed include plant-pathogen interaction, secondary metabolism, sugar metabolism, and vitamin metabolism. In addition, genes associated with signaling pathways such as salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ETH) were also downregulated in the shade. A qRT-PCR assay of 15 DEGs was performed to confirm transcriptome results. According to our knowledge, this is the first report on soybean response to dual stress factors. These results provide insights into the molecular mechanisms in which soybean plants were infected with SMV in the shade. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6784153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67841532019-10-16 Comparison of Transcriptome Differences in Soybean Response to Soybean Mosaic Virus under Normal Light and in the Shade Zhang, Lei Shang, Jing Wang, Wenming Du, Junbo Li, Kai Wu, Xiaoling Yu, Liang Liu, Chunyan Khaskheli, Muhammad Ibrahim Yang, Wenyu Viruses Article Shading in the intercropping system is a major abiotic factor which influences soybean growth and development, while soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is a biotic factor that limits the yield and quality of soybean. However, little is known about the defense response of soybean to SMV in the shade. Thus, in the current study, both intensity and quality (red:far-red, R:FR) of the light were changed to simulate the shaded environment and comparative transcriptome analysis was performed. Morphologically, plant growth was inhibited by SMV, which decreased 35.93% of plant height and 8.97% of stem diameter in the shade. A total of 3548 and 4319 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in soybean plants infected with SMV under normal light and in the shade. Enrichment analysis showed that the plant defense-related genes were upregulated under normal light but downregulated in the shade. Pathways that were repressed include plant-pathogen interaction, secondary metabolism, sugar metabolism, and vitamin metabolism. In addition, genes associated with signaling pathways such as salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ETH) were also downregulated in the shade. A qRT-PCR assay of 15 DEGs was performed to confirm transcriptome results. According to our knowledge, this is the first report on soybean response to dual stress factors. These results provide insights into the molecular mechanisms in which soybean plants were infected with SMV in the shade. MDPI 2019-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6784153/ /pubmed/31470502 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v11090793 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Lei Shang, Jing Wang, Wenming Du, Junbo Li, Kai Wu, Xiaoling Yu, Liang Liu, Chunyan Khaskheli, Muhammad Ibrahim Yang, Wenyu Comparison of Transcriptome Differences in Soybean Response to Soybean Mosaic Virus under Normal Light and in the Shade |
title | Comparison of Transcriptome Differences in Soybean Response to Soybean Mosaic Virus under Normal Light and in the Shade |
title_full | Comparison of Transcriptome Differences in Soybean Response to Soybean Mosaic Virus under Normal Light and in the Shade |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Transcriptome Differences in Soybean Response to Soybean Mosaic Virus under Normal Light and in the Shade |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Transcriptome Differences in Soybean Response to Soybean Mosaic Virus under Normal Light and in the Shade |
title_short | Comparison of Transcriptome Differences in Soybean Response to Soybean Mosaic Virus under Normal Light and in the Shade |
title_sort | comparison of transcriptome differences in soybean response to soybean mosaic virus under normal light and in the shade |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31470502 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v11090793 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanglei comparisonoftranscriptomedifferencesinsoybeanresponsetosoybeanmosaicvirusundernormallightandintheshade AT shangjing comparisonoftranscriptomedifferencesinsoybeanresponsetosoybeanmosaicvirusundernormallightandintheshade AT wangwenming comparisonoftranscriptomedifferencesinsoybeanresponsetosoybeanmosaicvirusundernormallightandintheshade AT dujunbo comparisonoftranscriptomedifferencesinsoybeanresponsetosoybeanmosaicvirusundernormallightandintheshade AT likai comparisonoftranscriptomedifferencesinsoybeanresponsetosoybeanmosaicvirusundernormallightandintheshade AT wuxiaoling comparisonoftranscriptomedifferencesinsoybeanresponsetosoybeanmosaicvirusundernormallightandintheshade AT yuliang comparisonoftranscriptomedifferencesinsoybeanresponsetosoybeanmosaicvirusundernormallightandintheshade AT liuchunyan comparisonoftranscriptomedifferencesinsoybeanresponsetosoybeanmosaicvirusundernormallightandintheshade AT khaskhelimuhammadibrahim comparisonoftranscriptomedifferencesinsoybeanresponsetosoybeanmosaicvirusundernormallightandintheshade AT yangwenyu comparisonoftranscriptomedifferencesinsoybeanresponsetosoybeanmosaicvirusundernormallightandintheshade |