Cargando…

Running Propensities of Athletes with Hamstring Injuries

The current study aims to compare the mechanical propensities between healthy runners and runners with hamstring injuries. Retrospective case-control video analysis was used. A total of 35 (12 male and 23 female) videos of runners with hamstring injuries were compared with videos of sex-, age-, mass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugimoto, Dai, Kelly, Brian D., Mandel, David L., d’Hemecourt, Duncan A., Carpenito, Sara C., d’Hemecourt, Charles A., d’Hemecourt, Pierre A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31547307
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7090210
_version_ 1783457720708366336
author Sugimoto, Dai
Kelly, Brian D.
Mandel, David L.
d’Hemecourt, Duncan A.
Carpenito, Sara C.
d’Hemecourt, Charles A.
d’Hemecourt, Pierre A.
author_facet Sugimoto, Dai
Kelly, Brian D.
Mandel, David L.
d’Hemecourt, Duncan A.
Carpenito, Sara C.
d’Hemecourt, Charles A.
d’Hemecourt, Pierre A.
author_sort Sugimoto, Dai
collection PubMed
description The current study aims to compare the mechanical propensities between healthy runners and runners with hamstring injuries. Retrospective case-control video analysis was used. A total of 35 (12 male and 23 female) videos of runners with hamstring injuries were compared with videos of sex-, age-, mass-, and height-matched healthy control runners. The main outcome variables were trunk posture angles, overstride angles, and foot strike patterns. An independent t-test and chi-squared tests were employed to analyze the main outcome variables between the runners with hamstring injuries and the healthy control runners. The statistical significance of less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) was used. The runners with hamstring injuries had a 1.6° less forward-trunk posture angles compared with the healthy control runners (p = 0.043). Also, the runners with hamstring injuries demonstrated a 4.9° greater overstride angles compared with the healthy control runners (p = 0.001). Finally, the runners with hamstring injuries had a tendency of rearfoot strike, while the healthy control runners showed a forefoot strike pattern (p = 0.004). In conclusion, the runners with hamstring injuries demonstrated different running mechanical propensities compared with the healthy runners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6784223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67842232019-10-16 Running Propensities of Athletes with Hamstring Injuries Sugimoto, Dai Kelly, Brian D. Mandel, David L. d’Hemecourt, Duncan A. Carpenito, Sara C. d’Hemecourt, Charles A. d’Hemecourt, Pierre A. Sports (Basel) Article The current study aims to compare the mechanical propensities between healthy runners and runners with hamstring injuries. Retrospective case-control video analysis was used. A total of 35 (12 male and 23 female) videos of runners with hamstring injuries were compared with videos of sex-, age-, mass-, and height-matched healthy control runners. The main outcome variables were trunk posture angles, overstride angles, and foot strike patterns. An independent t-test and chi-squared tests were employed to analyze the main outcome variables between the runners with hamstring injuries and the healthy control runners. The statistical significance of less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) was used. The runners with hamstring injuries had a 1.6° less forward-trunk posture angles compared with the healthy control runners (p = 0.043). Also, the runners with hamstring injuries demonstrated a 4.9° greater overstride angles compared with the healthy control runners (p = 0.001). Finally, the runners with hamstring injuries had a tendency of rearfoot strike, while the healthy control runners showed a forefoot strike pattern (p = 0.004). In conclusion, the runners with hamstring injuries demonstrated different running mechanical propensities compared with the healthy runners. MDPI 2019-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6784223/ /pubmed/31547307 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7090210 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sugimoto, Dai
Kelly, Brian D.
Mandel, David L.
d’Hemecourt, Duncan A.
Carpenito, Sara C.
d’Hemecourt, Charles A.
d’Hemecourt, Pierre A.
Running Propensities of Athletes with Hamstring Injuries
title Running Propensities of Athletes with Hamstring Injuries
title_full Running Propensities of Athletes with Hamstring Injuries
title_fullStr Running Propensities of Athletes with Hamstring Injuries
title_full_unstemmed Running Propensities of Athletes with Hamstring Injuries
title_short Running Propensities of Athletes with Hamstring Injuries
title_sort running propensities of athletes with hamstring injuries
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31547307
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7090210
work_keys_str_mv AT sugimotodai runningpropensitiesofathleteswithhamstringinjuries
AT kellybriand runningpropensitiesofathleteswithhamstringinjuries
AT mandeldavidl runningpropensitiesofathleteswithhamstringinjuries
AT dhemecourtduncana runningpropensitiesofathleteswithhamstringinjuries
AT carpenitosarac runningpropensitiesofathleteswithhamstringinjuries
AT dhemecourtcharlesa runningpropensitiesofathleteswithhamstringinjuries
AT dhemecourtpierrea runningpropensitiesofathleteswithhamstringinjuries