Cargando…

Implementation strategies, and barriers and facilitators for implementation of physical activity at work: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Inactivity and sedentary lifestyle have led experts to recommend an increase in structured, workplace-based physical activity (PA) initiatives. Previous studies on workplace-based PA have only shown moderate and short-term effects. This has been attributed to the lack of clear implementa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garne-Dalgaard, Anne, Mann, Stephanie, Bredahl, Thomas Viskum Gjelstrup, Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0268-5
_version_ 1783457741026623488
author Garne-Dalgaard, Anne
Mann, Stephanie
Bredahl, Thomas Viskum Gjelstrup
Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen
author_facet Garne-Dalgaard, Anne
Mann, Stephanie
Bredahl, Thomas Viskum Gjelstrup
Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen
author_sort Garne-Dalgaard, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inactivity and sedentary lifestyle have led experts to recommend an increase in structured, workplace-based physical activity (PA) initiatives. Previous studies on workplace-based PA have only shown moderate and short-term effects. This has been attributed to the lack of clear implementation strategies and understanding of factors that may hinder or enable uptake of PA. To ensure long-term, sustainable outcomes, there is a need for a better understanding of implementation strategies, and barriers and facilitators to workplace-based PA. METHOD: A scoping review of studies investigating implementation approaches and factors affecting uptake of workplace-based PA was conducted. Qualitative and quantitative articles published in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, or PsycINFO between 2008 and 2018 evaluating the implementation of PA were included. Data on study characteristics, evaluation, and implementation methods applied were systematically extracted. Two reviewers extracted, coded, and organised factors affecting uptake using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS: After dual, blinded screening of titles and abstracts, 16 articles reporting on eight studies were included in the review. Several different methods of implementation were applied, including information meeting, kick-off events, and “change agents” as the most common. A total of 109 factors influencing implementation were identified, consisting of 57 barriers and 52 facilitators. Barriers most often related to the TDF domains Environmental Context and Resources (n = 34, 36.2%), Social influences (n = 13, 13.8%), and Social/Professional Role and Identity (n = 8, 8.5%). Likewise, facilitators most often related to the TDF domains Social influences (n = 17, 19.5%), Environmental Context and Resources (n = 16, 18.4%), and Social/Professional Role and Identity (n = 9, 10.3%). CONCLUSION: Our review has highlighted the multilevel factors affecting the uptake of workplace-based PA and underpins the complexities in implementation of such initiatives. The published literature predominantly provides details from the employees’ perspectives on factors that need to be addressed and a lack of attention to these factors will cause them to hamper uptake of PA. The analysis of barriers and facilitators provides a theoretical foundation to guide future intervention design. However, further research is needed to fully understand the success or failure of implementation processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-019-0268-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6784342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67843422019-10-17 Implementation strategies, and barriers and facilitators for implementation of physical activity at work: a scoping review Garne-Dalgaard, Anne Mann, Stephanie Bredahl, Thomas Viskum Gjelstrup Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen Chiropr Man Therap Scoping Reviews BACKGROUND: Inactivity and sedentary lifestyle have led experts to recommend an increase in structured, workplace-based physical activity (PA) initiatives. Previous studies on workplace-based PA have only shown moderate and short-term effects. This has been attributed to the lack of clear implementation strategies and understanding of factors that may hinder or enable uptake of PA. To ensure long-term, sustainable outcomes, there is a need for a better understanding of implementation strategies, and barriers and facilitators to workplace-based PA. METHOD: A scoping review of studies investigating implementation approaches and factors affecting uptake of workplace-based PA was conducted. Qualitative and quantitative articles published in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, or PsycINFO between 2008 and 2018 evaluating the implementation of PA were included. Data on study characteristics, evaluation, and implementation methods applied were systematically extracted. Two reviewers extracted, coded, and organised factors affecting uptake using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS: After dual, blinded screening of titles and abstracts, 16 articles reporting on eight studies were included in the review. Several different methods of implementation were applied, including information meeting, kick-off events, and “change agents” as the most common. A total of 109 factors influencing implementation were identified, consisting of 57 barriers and 52 facilitators. Barriers most often related to the TDF domains Environmental Context and Resources (n = 34, 36.2%), Social influences (n = 13, 13.8%), and Social/Professional Role and Identity (n = 8, 8.5%). Likewise, facilitators most often related to the TDF domains Social influences (n = 17, 19.5%), Environmental Context and Resources (n = 16, 18.4%), and Social/Professional Role and Identity (n = 9, 10.3%). CONCLUSION: Our review has highlighted the multilevel factors affecting the uptake of workplace-based PA and underpins the complexities in implementation of such initiatives. The published literature predominantly provides details from the employees’ perspectives on factors that need to be addressed and a lack of attention to these factors will cause them to hamper uptake of PA. The analysis of barriers and facilitators provides a theoretical foundation to guide future intervention design. However, further research is needed to fully understand the success or failure of implementation processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-019-0268-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6784342/ /pubmed/31624537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0268-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Scoping Reviews
Garne-Dalgaard, Anne
Mann, Stephanie
Bredahl, Thomas Viskum Gjelstrup
Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen
Implementation strategies, and barriers and facilitators for implementation of physical activity at work: a scoping review
title Implementation strategies, and barriers and facilitators for implementation of physical activity at work: a scoping review
title_full Implementation strategies, and barriers and facilitators for implementation of physical activity at work: a scoping review
title_fullStr Implementation strategies, and barriers and facilitators for implementation of physical activity at work: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Implementation strategies, and barriers and facilitators for implementation of physical activity at work: a scoping review
title_short Implementation strategies, and barriers and facilitators for implementation of physical activity at work: a scoping review
title_sort implementation strategies, and barriers and facilitators for implementation of physical activity at work: a scoping review
topic Scoping Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0268-5
work_keys_str_mv AT garnedalgaardanne implementationstrategiesandbarriersandfacilitatorsforimplementationofphysicalactivityatworkascopingreview
AT mannstephanie implementationstrategiesandbarriersandfacilitatorsforimplementationofphysicalactivityatworkascopingreview
AT bredahlthomasviskumgjelstrup implementationstrategiesandbarriersandfacilitatorsforimplementationofphysicalactivityatworkascopingreview
AT stochkendahlmettejensen implementationstrategiesandbarriersandfacilitatorsforimplementationofphysicalactivityatworkascopingreview