Cargando…
Optimizing moving average control procedures for small-volume laboratories: can it be done?
INTRODUCTION: Moving average (MA) means calculating the average value from a set of patient results and further using that value for analytical quality control purposes. The aim of this study was to examine whether the selection, optimization and validation of MA procedures can be performed using th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624463 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2019.030710 |
_version_ | 1783457754987364352 |
---|---|
author | Lukić, Vera Ignjatović, Svetlana |
author_facet | Lukić, Vera Ignjatović, Svetlana |
author_sort | Lukić, Vera |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Moving average (MA) means calculating the average value from a set of patient results and further using that value for analytical quality control purposes. The aim of this study was to examine whether the selection, optimization and validation of MA procedures can be performed using the already described bias detection simulation method and whether it is possible to select appropriate MA procedures for a laboratory with a small daily testing volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was done on four analytes: creatinine, potassium, sodium and albumin. All patient results of these tests processed during six months were taken from the laboratory information system. Using the MA Generator software, different MA procedures were analysed. Different inclusion criteria, calculation formulas, batch sizes and weighting factors were tested. Selection of optimal MA procedures was based on their ability to detect simulated biases of different sizes. After optimization, the validation of MA procedures was done. The results were presented by bias detection curves and MA validation charts. RESULTS: Simple MA procedures for albumin and sodium without truncation limits were selected as optimal. Exponentially weighted MA procedures were found optimal for creatinine and potassium, with the upper truncation limits of 150 μmol/L and 6 mmol/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It has been experimentally confirmed that it is possible to perform the selection, optimization and validation of MA procedures using the bias detection simulation method. Also, it is possible to define MA procedures optimal for a laboratory with a small daily testing volume. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6784424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67844242019-10-17 Optimizing moving average control procedures for small-volume laboratories: can it be done? Lukić, Vera Ignjatović, Svetlana Biochem Med (Zagreb) Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Moving average (MA) means calculating the average value from a set of patient results and further using that value for analytical quality control purposes. The aim of this study was to examine whether the selection, optimization and validation of MA procedures can be performed using the already described bias detection simulation method and whether it is possible to select appropriate MA procedures for a laboratory with a small daily testing volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was done on four analytes: creatinine, potassium, sodium and albumin. All patient results of these tests processed during six months were taken from the laboratory information system. Using the MA Generator software, different MA procedures were analysed. Different inclusion criteria, calculation formulas, batch sizes and weighting factors were tested. Selection of optimal MA procedures was based on their ability to detect simulated biases of different sizes. After optimization, the validation of MA procedures was done. The results were presented by bias detection curves and MA validation charts. RESULTS: Simple MA procedures for albumin and sodium without truncation limits were selected as optimal. Exponentially weighted MA procedures were found optimal for creatinine and potassium, with the upper truncation limits of 150 μmol/L and 6 mmol/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It has been experimentally confirmed that it is possible to perform the selection, optimization and validation of MA procedures using the bias detection simulation method. Also, it is possible to define MA procedures optimal for a laboratory with a small daily testing volume. Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2019-10-15 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6784424/ /pubmed/31624463 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2019.030710 Text en ©Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Lukić, Vera Ignjatović, Svetlana Optimizing moving average control procedures for small-volume laboratories: can it be done? |
title | Optimizing moving average control procedures for small-volume laboratories: can it be done? |
title_full | Optimizing moving average control procedures for small-volume laboratories: can it be done? |
title_fullStr | Optimizing moving average control procedures for small-volume laboratories: can it be done? |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing moving average control procedures for small-volume laboratories: can it be done? |
title_short | Optimizing moving average control procedures for small-volume laboratories: can it be done? |
title_sort | optimizing moving average control procedures for small-volume laboratories: can it be done? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624463 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2019.030710 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lukicvera optimizingmovingaveragecontrolproceduresforsmallvolumelaboratoriescanitbedone AT ignjatovicsvetlana optimizingmovingaveragecontrolproceduresforsmallvolumelaboratoriescanitbedone |