Cargando…

Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals

Activation techniques are essential for root canal disinfection but may result in incomplete removal of bacteria. The aim of our study was to assess the antibacterial action of sonically, ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on Enterococcus faecalis in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hage, Wajih, De Moor, Roeland J. G., Hajj, Désirée, Sfeir, Germain, Sarkis, Dolla K., Zogheib, Carla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31252522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7030064
_version_ 1783457763562618880
author Hage, Wajih
De Moor, Roeland J. G.
Hajj, Désirée
Sfeir, Germain
Sarkis, Dolla K.
Zogheib, Carla
author_facet Hage, Wajih
De Moor, Roeland J. G.
Hajj, Désirée
Sfeir, Germain
Sarkis, Dolla K.
Zogheib, Carla
author_sort Hage, Wajih
collection PubMed
description Activation techniques are essential for root canal disinfection but may result in incomplete removal of bacteria. The aim of our study was to assess the antibacterial action of sonically, ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on Enterococcus faecalis in an infected tooth. Forty-four extracted mandibular premolars were mechanically prepared, sterilized, and inoculated with E. faecalis for 1 week. Bacterial counts after inoculation were evaluated in 4 randomly chosen teeth, remaining root canals were divided into 4 groups. Group A: laser-activated irrigation by photon-induced photoacoustic streaming, Group B: the sonic irrigation by EDDY, Group C: ultrasonic irrigation by EndoUltra, and Group D: 5.25% NaOCl. Colony forming unit (CFU) counts were measured and Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Wilcoxon, Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used to determine differences. The mean of CFU was found to significantly decrease in group D, 2110 ± 1015.93 (p < 0.001). Changes in measurement levels followed the same trend over time in groups A 27.40 ± 30.15, B 81.3 ± 85.68 and C 44.40 ± 67.12 (p = 0.141). The average CFU after irrigation in all groups was significantly greater than 0. Within the limitations of this study, all activation techniques were superior to NaOCl 5.25% in reducing E. faecalis from the infected tooth model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6784465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67844652019-10-16 Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals Hage, Wajih De Moor, Roeland J. G. Hajj, Désirée Sfeir, Germain Sarkis, Dolla K. Zogheib, Carla Dent J (Basel) Article Activation techniques are essential for root canal disinfection but may result in incomplete removal of bacteria. The aim of our study was to assess the antibacterial action of sonically, ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on Enterococcus faecalis in an infected tooth. Forty-four extracted mandibular premolars were mechanically prepared, sterilized, and inoculated with E. faecalis for 1 week. Bacterial counts after inoculation were evaluated in 4 randomly chosen teeth, remaining root canals were divided into 4 groups. Group A: laser-activated irrigation by photon-induced photoacoustic streaming, Group B: the sonic irrigation by EDDY, Group C: ultrasonic irrigation by EndoUltra, and Group D: 5.25% NaOCl. Colony forming unit (CFU) counts were measured and Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Wilcoxon, Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used to determine differences. The mean of CFU was found to significantly decrease in group D, 2110 ± 1015.93 (p < 0.001). Changes in measurement levels followed the same trend over time in groups A 27.40 ± 30.15, B 81.3 ± 85.68 and C 44.40 ± 67.12 (p = 0.141). The average CFU after irrigation in all groups was significantly greater than 0. Within the limitations of this study, all activation techniques were superior to NaOCl 5.25% in reducing E. faecalis from the infected tooth model. MDPI 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6784465/ /pubmed/31252522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7030064 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hage, Wajih
De Moor, Roeland J. G.
Hajj, Désirée
Sfeir, Germain
Sarkis, Dolla K.
Zogheib, Carla
Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals
title Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals
title_full Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals
title_fullStr Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals
title_short Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals
title_sort impact of different irrigant agitation methods on bacterial elimination from infected root canals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31252522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7030064
work_keys_str_mv AT hagewajih impactofdifferentirrigantagitationmethodsonbacterialeliminationfrominfectedrootcanals
AT demoorroelandjg impactofdifferentirrigantagitationmethodsonbacterialeliminationfrominfectedrootcanals
AT hajjdesiree impactofdifferentirrigantagitationmethodsonbacterialeliminationfrominfectedrootcanals
AT sfeirgermain impactofdifferentirrigantagitationmethodsonbacterialeliminationfrominfectedrootcanals
AT sarkisdollak impactofdifferentirrigantagitationmethodsonbacterialeliminationfrominfectedrootcanals
AT zogheibcarla impactofdifferentirrigantagitationmethodsonbacterialeliminationfrominfectedrootcanals