Cargando…
Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals
Activation techniques are essential for root canal disinfection but may result in incomplete removal of bacteria. The aim of our study was to assess the antibacterial action of sonically, ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on Enterococcus faecalis in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31252522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7030064 |
_version_ | 1783457763562618880 |
---|---|
author | Hage, Wajih De Moor, Roeland J. G. Hajj, Désirée Sfeir, Germain Sarkis, Dolla K. Zogheib, Carla |
author_facet | Hage, Wajih De Moor, Roeland J. G. Hajj, Désirée Sfeir, Germain Sarkis, Dolla K. Zogheib, Carla |
author_sort | Hage, Wajih |
collection | PubMed |
description | Activation techniques are essential for root canal disinfection but may result in incomplete removal of bacteria. The aim of our study was to assess the antibacterial action of sonically, ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on Enterococcus faecalis in an infected tooth. Forty-four extracted mandibular premolars were mechanically prepared, sterilized, and inoculated with E. faecalis for 1 week. Bacterial counts after inoculation were evaluated in 4 randomly chosen teeth, remaining root canals were divided into 4 groups. Group A: laser-activated irrigation by photon-induced photoacoustic streaming, Group B: the sonic irrigation by EDDY, Group C: ultrasonic irrigation by EndoUltra, and Group D: 5.25% NaOCl. Colony forming unit (CFU) counts were measured and Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Wilcoxon, Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used to determine differences. The mean of CFU was found to significantly decrease in group D, 2110 ± 1015.93 (p < 0.001). Changes in measurement levels followed the same trend over time in groups A 27.40 ± 30.15, B 81.3 ± 85.68 and C 44.40 ± 67.12 (p = 0.141). The average CFU after irrigation in all groups was significantly greater than 0. Within the limitations of this study, all activation techniques were superior to NaOCl 5.25% in reducing E. faecalis from the infected tooth model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6784465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67844652019-10-16 Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals Hage, Wajih De Moor, Roeland J. G. Hajj, Désirée Sfeir, Germain Sarkis, Dolla K. Zogheib, Carla Dent J (Basel) Article Activation techniques are essential for root canal disinfection but may result in incomplete removal of bacteria. The aim of our study was to assess the antibacterial action of sonically, ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on Enterococcus faecalis in an infected tooth. Forty-four extracted mandibular premolars were mechanically prepared, sterilized, and inoculated with E. faecalis for 1 week. Bacterial counts after inoculation were evaluated in 4 randomly chosen teeth, remaining root canals were divided into 4 groups. Group A: laser-activated irrigation by photon-induced photoacoustic streaming, Group B: the sonic irrigation by EDDY, Group C: ultrasonic irrigation by EndoUltra, and Group D: 5.25% NaOCl. Colony forming unit (CFU) counts were measured and Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Wilcoxon, Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used to determine differences. The mean of CFU was found to significantly decrease in group D, 2110 ± 1015.93 (p < 0.001). Changes in measurement levels followed the same trend over time in groups A 27.40 ± 30.15, B 81.3 ± 85.68 and C 44.40 ± 67.12 (p = 0.141). The average CFU after irrigation in all groups was significantly greater than 0. Within the limitations of this study, all activation techniques were superior to NaOCl 5.25% in reducing E. faecalis from the infected tooth model. MDPI 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6784465/ /pubmed/31252522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7030064 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hage, Wajih De Moor, Roeland J. G. Hajj, Désirée Sfeir, Germain Sarkis, Dolla K. Zogheib, Carla Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals |
title | Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals |
title_full | Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals |
title_fullStr | Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals |
title_short | Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals |
title_sort | impact of different irrigant agitation methods on bacterial elimination from infected root canals |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31252522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7030064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hagewajih impactofdifferentirrigantagitationmethodsonbacterialeliminationfrominfectedrootcanals AT demoorroelandjg impactofdifferentirrigantagitationmethodsonbacterialeliminationfrominfectedrootcanals AT hajjdesiree impactofdifferentirrigantagitationmethodsonbacterialeliminationfrominfectedrootcanals AT sfeirgermain impactofdifferentirrigantagitationmethodsonbacterialeliminationfrominfectedrootcanals AT sarkisdollak impactofdifferentirrigantagitationmethodsonbacterialeliminationfrominfectedrootcanals AT zogheibcarla impactofdifferentirrigantagitationmethodsonbacterialeliminationfrominfectedrootcanals |