Cargando…

Push and pull factors driving movement in a social mammal: context dependent behavioral plasticity at the landscape scale

Understanding how key parameters (e.g., density, range-size, and configuration) can affect animal movement remains a major goal of population ecology. This is particularly important for wildlife disease hosts, such as the European badger Meles meles, a reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis. Here we show...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byrne, Andrew W, O’Keeffe, James, Buesching, Christina D, Newman, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy081
_version_ 1783457770242048000
author Byrne, Andrew W
O’Keeffe, James
Buesching, Christina D
Newman, Chris
author_facet Byrne, Andrew W
O’Keeffe, James
Buesching, Christina D
Newman, Chris
author_sort Byrne, Andrew W
collection PubMed
description Understanding how key parameters (e.g., density, range-size, and configuration) can affect animal movement remains a major goal of population ecology. This is particularly important for wildlife disease hosts, such as the European badger Meles meles, a reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis. Here we show how movements of 463 individuals among 223 inferred group territories across 755 km(2) in Ireland were affected by sex, age, past-movement history, group composition, and group size index from 2009 to 2012. Females exhibited a greater probability of moving into groups with a male-biased composition, but male movements into groups were not associated with group composition. Male badgers were, however, more likely to make visits into territories than females. Animals that had immigrated into a territory previously were more likely to emigrate in the future. Animals exhibiting such “itinerant” movement patterns were more likely to belong to younger age classes. Inter-territorial movement propensity was negatively associated with group size, indicating that larger groups were more stable and less attractive (or permeable) to immigrants. Across the landscape, there was substantial variation in inferred territory-size and movement dynamics, which was related to group size. This represents behavioral plasticity previously only reported at the scale of the species’ biogeographical range. Our results highlight how a “one-size-fits-all” explanation of badger movement is likely to fail under varying ecological contexts and scales, with implications for bovine tuberculosis management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6784507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67845072019-10-15 Push and pull factors driving movement in a social mammal: context dependent behavioral plasticity at the landscape scale Byrne, Andrew W O’Keeffe, James Buesching, Christina D Newman, Chris Curr Zool Articles Understanding how key parameters (e.g., density, range-size, and configuration) can affect animal movement remains a major goal of population ecology. This is particularly important for wildlife disease hosts, such as the European badger Meles meles, a reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis. Here we show how movements of 463 individuals among 223 inferred group territories across 755 km(2) in Ireland were affected by sex, age, past-movement history, group composition, and group size index from 2009 to 2012. Females exhibited a greater probability of moving into groups with a male-biased composition, but male movements into groups were not associated with group composition. Male badgers were, however, more likely to make visits into territories than females. Animals that had immigrated into a territory previously were more likely to emigrate in the future. Animals exhibiting such “itinerant” movement patterns were more likely to belong to younger age classes. Inter-territorial movement propensity was negatively associated with group size, indicating that larger groups were more stable and less attractive (or permeable) to immigrants. Across the landscape, there was substantial variation in inferred territory-size and movement dynamics, which was related to group size. This represents behavioral plasticity previously only reported at the scale of the species’ biogeographical range. Our results highlight how a “one-size-fits-all” explanation of badger movement is likely to fail under varying ecological contexts and scales, with implications for bovine tuberculosis management. Oxford University Press 2019-10 2018-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6784507/ /pubmed/31616482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy081 Text en © The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Articles
Byrne, Andrew W
O’Keeffe, James
Buesching, Christina D
Newman, Chris
Push and pull factors driving movement in a social mammal: context dependent behavioral plasticity at the landscape scale
title Push and pull factors driving movement in a social mammal: context dependent behavioral plasticity at the landscape scale
title_full Push and pull factors driving movement in a social mammal: context dependent behavioral plasticity at the landscape scale
title_fullStr Push and pull factors driving movement in a social mammal: context dependent behavioral plasticity at the landscape scale
title_full_unstemmed Push and pull factors driving movement in a social mammal: context dependent behavioral plasticity at the landscape scale
title_short Push and pull factors driving movement in a social mammal: context dependent behavioral plasticity at the landscape scale
title_sort push and pull factors driving movement in a social mammal: context dependent behavioral plasticity at the landscape scale
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy081
work_keys_str_mv AT byrneandreww pushandpullfactorsdrivingmovementinasocialmammalcontextdependentbehavioralplasticityatthelandscapescale
AT okeeffejames pushandpullfactorsdrivingmovementinasocialmammalcontextdependentbehavioralplasticityatthelandscapescale
AT bueschingchristinad pushandpullfactorsdrivingmovementinasocialmammalcontextdependentbehavioralplasticityatthelandscapescale
AT newmanchris pushandpullfactorsdrivingmovementinasocialmammalcontextdependentbehavioralplasticityatthelandscapescale