Cargando…

Design and Evaluation of a Non-Contact Bed-Mounted Sensing Device for Automated In-Home Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Pilot Study

We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the accuracy of a custom built non-contact pressure-sensitive device in diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity as an alternative to in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) and a Type 3 in-home sleep apnea test (HSAT). Fourteen patients completed PSG slee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mosquera-Lopez, Clara, Leitschuh, Joseph, Condon, John, Hagen, Chad C., Rajhbeharrysingh, Uma, Hanks, Cody, Jacobs, Peter G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31336678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios9030090
_version_ 1783457798790578176
author Mosquera-Lopez, Clara
Leitschuh, Joseph
Condon, John
Hagen, Chad C.
Rajhbeharrysingh, Uma
Hanks, Cody
Jacobs, Peter G.
author_facet Mosquera-Lopez, Clara
Leitschuh, Joseph
Condon, John
Hagen, Chad C.
Rajhbeharrysingh, Uma
Hanks, Cody
Jacobs, Peter G.
author_sort Mosquera-Lopez, Clara
collection PubMed
description We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the accuracy of a custom built non-contact pressure-sensitive device in diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity as an alternative to in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) and a Type 3 in-home sleep apnea test (HSAT). Fourteen patients completed PSG sleep studies for one night with simultaneous recording from our load-cell-based sensing device in the bed. Subjects subsequently installed pressure sensors in their bed at home and recorded signals for up to four nights. Machine learning models were optimized to classify sleep apnea severity using a standardized American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) scoring of the gold standard studies as reference. On a per-night basis, our model reached a correct OSA detection rate of 82.9% (sensitivity = 88.9%, specificity = 76.5%), and OSA severity classification accuracy of 74.3% (61.5% and 81.8% correctly classified in-clinic and in-home tests, respectively). There was no difference in Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) estimation when subjects wore HSAT sensors versus load cells (LCs) only (p-value = 0.62). Our in-home diagnostic system provides an unobtrusive method for detecting OSA with high sensitivity and may potentially be used for long-term monitoring of breathing during sleep. Further research is needed to address the lower specificity resulting from using the highest AHI from repeated samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6784712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67847122019-10-16 Design and Evaluation of a Non-Contact Bed-Mounted Sensing Device for Automated In-Home Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Pilot Study Mosquera-Lopez, Clara Leitschuh, Joseph Condon, John Hagen, Chad C. Rajhbeharrysingh, Uma Hanks, Cody Jacobs, Peter G. Biosensors (Basel) Article We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the accuracy of a custom built non-contact pressure-sensitive device in diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity as an alternative to in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) and a Type 3 in-home sleep apnea test (HSAT). Fourteen patients completed PSG sleep studies for one night with simultaneous recording from our load-cell-based sensing device in the bed. Subjects subsequently installed pressure sensors in their bed at home and recorded signals for up to four nights. Machine learning models were optimized to classify sleep apnea severity using a standardized American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) scoring of the gold standard studies as reference. On a per-night basis, our model reached a correct OSA detection rate of 82.9% (sensitivity = 88.9%, specificity = 76.5%), and OSA severity classification accuracy of 74.3% (61.5% and 81.8% correctly classified in-clinic and in-home tests, respectively). There was no difference in Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) estimation when subjects wore HSAT sensors versus load cells (LCs) only (p-value = 0.62). Our in-home diagnostic system provides an unobtrusive method for detecting OSA with high sensitivity and may potentially be used for long-term monitoring of breathing during sleep. Further research is needed to address the lower specificity resulting from using the highest AHI from repeated samples. MDPI 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6784712/ /pubmed/31336678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios9030090 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mosquera-Lopez, Clara
Leitschuh, Joseph
Condon, John
Hagen, Chad C.
Rajhbeharrysingh, Uma
Hanks, Cody
Jacobs, Peter G.
Design and Evaluation of a Non-Contact Bed-Mounted Sensing Device for Automated In-Home Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Pilot Study
title Design and Evaluation of a Non-Contact Bed-Mounted Sensing Device for Automated In-Home Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Pilot Study
title_full Design and Evaluation of a Non-Contact Bed-Mounted Sensing Device for Automated In-Home Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Design and Evaluation of a Non-Contact Bed-Mounted Sensing Device for Automated In-Home Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Design and Evaluation of a Non-Contact Bed-Mounted Sensing Device for Automated In-Home Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Pilot Study
title_short Design and Evaluation of a Non-Contact Bed-Mounted Sensing Device for Automated In-Home Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Pilot Study
title_sort design and evaluation of a non-contact bed-mounted sensing device for automated in-home detection of obstructive sleep apnea: a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31336678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios9030090
work_keys_str_mv AT mosqueralopezclara designandevaluationofanoncontactbedmountedsensingdeviceforautomatedinhomedetectionofobstructivesleepapneaapilotstudy
AT leitschuhjoseph designandevaluationofanoncontactbedmountedsensingdeviceforautomatedinhomedetectionofobstructivesleepapneaapilotstudy
AT condonjohn designandevaluationofanoncontactbedmountedsensingdeviceforautomatedinhomedetectionofobstructivesleepapneaapilotstudy
AT hagenchadc designandevaluationofanoncontactbedmountedsensingdeviceforautomatedinhomedetectionofobstructivesleepapneaapilotstudy
AT rajhbeharrysinghuma designandevaluationofanoncontactbedmountedsensingdeviceforautomatedinhomedetectionofobstructivesleepapneaapilotstudy
AT hankscody designandevaluationofanoncontactbedmountedsensingdeviceforautomatedinhomedetectionofobstructivesleepapneaapilotstudy
AT jacobspeterg designandevaluationofanoncontactbedmountedsensingdeviceforautomatedinhomedetectionofobstructivesleepapneaapilotstudy