Cargando…
An assessment of the immune costs associated with meiotic drive elements in Drosophila
Most organisms are constantly adapting to pathogens and parasites that exploit their host for their own benefit. Less studied, but perhaps more ubiquitous, are intragenomic parasites or selfish genetic elements. These include transposable elements, selfish B chromosomes and meiotic drivers that prom...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31530140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1534 |
_version_ | 1783457799513047040 |
---|---|
author | Lea, Jenna Kay Unckless, Robert L. |
author_facet | Lea, Jenna Kay Unckless, Robert L. |
author_sort | Lea, Jenna Kay |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most organisms are constantly adapting to pathogens and parasites that exploit their host for their own benefit. Less studied, but perhaps more ubiquitous, are intragenomic parasites or selfish genetic elements. These include transposable elements, selfish B chromosomes and meiotic drivers that promote their own replication without regard to fitness effects on hosts. Therefore, intragenomic parasites are also a constant evolutionary pressure on hosts. Gamete-killing meiotic drive elements are often associated with large chromosomal inversions that reduce recombination between the drive and wild-type chromosomes. This reduced recombination is thought to reduce the efficacy of selection on the drive chromosome and allow for the accumulation of deleterious mutations. We tested whether gamete-killing meiotic drive chromosomes were associated with reduced immune defence against two bacterial pathogens in three species of Drosophila. We found little evidence of reduced immune defence in lines with meiotic drive. One line carrying the Drosophila melanogaster autosomal Segregation Distorter did show reduced defence, but we were unable to attribute that reduced defence to either genotype or immune gene expression differences. Our results suggest that though gamete-killing meiotic drive chromosomes probably accumulate deleterious mutations, those mutations do not result in reduced capacity for immune defence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6784720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67847202019-10-14 An assessment of the immune costs associated with meiotic drive elements in Drosophila Lea, Jenna Kay Unckless, Robert L. Proc Biol Sci Special Feature Most organisms are constantly adapting to pathogens and parasites that exploit their host for their own benefit. Less studied, but perhaps more ubiquitous, are intragenomic parasites or selfish genetic elements. These include transposable elements, selfish B chromosomes and meiotic drivers that promote their own replication without regard to fitness effects on hosts. Therefore, intragenomic parasites are also a constant evolutionary pressure on hosts. Gamete-killing meiotic drive elements are often associated with large chromosomal inversions that reduce recombination between the drive and wild-type chromosomes. This reduced recombination is thought to reduce the efficacy of selection on the drive chromosome and allow for the accumulation of deleterious mutations. We tested whether gamete-killing meiotic drive chromosomes were associated with reduced immune defence against two bacterial pathogens in three species of Drosophila. We found little evidence of reduced immune defence in lines with meiotic drive. One line carrying the Drosophila melanogaster autosomal Segregation Distorter did show reduced defence, but we were unable to attribute that reduced defence to either genotype or immune gene expression differences. Our results suggest that though gamete-killing meiotic drive chromosomes probably accumulate deleterious mutations, those mutations do not result in reduced capacity for immune defence. The Royal Society 2019-09-25 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6784720/ /pubmed/31530140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1534 Text en © 2019 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Special Feature Lea, Jenna Kay Unckless, Robert L. An assessment of the immune costs associated with meiotic drive elements in Drosophila |
title | An assessment of the immune costs associated with meiotic drive elements in Drosophila |
title_full | An assessment of the immune costs associated with meiotic drive elements in Drosophila |
title_fullStr | An assessment of the immune costs associated with meiotic drive elements in Drosophila |
title_full_unstemmed | An assessment of the immune costs associated with meiotic drive elements in Drosophila |
title_short | An assessment of the immune costs associated with meiotic drive elements in Drosophila |
title_sort | assessment of the immune costs associated with meiotic drive elements in drosophila |
topic | Special Feature |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31530140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1534 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leajennakay anassessmentoftheimmunecostsassociatedwithmeioticdriveelementsindrosophila AT uncklessrobertl anassessmentoftheimmunecostsassociatedwithmeioticdriveelementsindrosophila AT leajennakay assessmentoftheimmunecostsassociatedwithmeioticdriveelementsindrosophila AT uncklessrobertl assessmentoftheimmunecostsassociatedwithmeioticdriveelementsindrosophila |