Cargando…

Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: Nonadherence to treatment with medicines is common globally, even for life-saving treatments. Cost is one important barrier to access, and only some jurisdictions provide medicines at no charge to patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether providing essential medicines at no charge to out...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Persaud, Navindra, Bedard, Michael, Boozary, Andrew S., Glazier, Richard H., Gomes, Tara, Hwang, Stephen W., Jüni, Peter, Law, Michael R., Mamdani, Muhammad M., Manns, Braden J., Martin, Danielle, Morgan, Steven G., Oh, Paul I., Pinto, Andrew D., Shah, Baiju R., Sullivan, Frank, Umali, Norman, Thorpe, Kevin E., Tu, Karen, Laupacis, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31589276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4472
_version_ 1783457802688135168
author Persaud, Navindra
Bedard, Michael
Boozary, Andrew S.
Glazier, Richard H.
Gomes, Tara
Hwang, Stephen W.
Jüni, Peter
Law, Michael R.
Mamdani, Muhammad M.
Manns, Braden J.
Martin, Danielle
Morgan, Steven G.
Oh, Paul I.
Pinto, Andrew D.
Shah, Baiju R.
Sullivan, Frank
Umali, Norman
Thorpe, Kevin E.
Tu, Karen
Laupacis, Andreas
author_facet Persaud, Navindra
Bedard, Michael
Boozary, Andrew S.
Glazier, Richard H.
Gomes, Tara
Hwang, Stephen W.
Jüni, Peter
Law, Michael R.
Mamdani, Muhammad M.
Manns, Braden J.
Martin, Danielle
Morgan, Steven G.
Oh, Paul I.
Pinto, Andrew D.
Shah, Baiju R.
Sullivan, Frank
Umali, Norman
Thorpe, Kevin E.
Tu, Karen
Laupacis, Andreas
author_sort Persaud, Navindra
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Nonadherence to treatment with medicines is common globally, even for life-saving treatments. Cost is one important barrier to access, and only some jurisdictions provide medicines at no charge to patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether providing essential medicines at no charge to outpatients who reported not being able to afford medicines improves adherence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter, unblinded, parallel, 2-group, superiority, outcomes assessor–blinded, individually randomized clinical trial conducted at 9 primary care sites in Ontario, Canada, enrolled 786 patients between June 1, 2016, and April 28, 2017, who reported cost-related nonadherence. Follow-up occurred at 12 months. The primary analysis was performed using an intention-to-treat principle. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive free medicines on a list of essential medicines in addition to otherwise usual care (n = 395) or usual medicine access and usual care (n = 391). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was adherence to treatment with all medicines that were appropriately prescribed for 1 year. Secondary outcomes were hemoglobin A(1c) level, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels 1 year after randomization in participants taking corresponding medicines. RESULTS: Among the 786 participants analyzed (439 women and 347 men; mean [SD] age, 51.7 [14.3] years), 764 completed the trial. Adherence to treatment with all medicines was higher in those randomized to receive free distribution (151 of 395 [38.2%]) compared with usual access (104 of 391 [26.6%]; difference, 11.6%; 95% CI, 4.9%-18.4%). Control of type 1 and 2 diabetes was not significantly improved by free distribution (hemoglobin A(1c), −0.38%; 95% CI, −0.76% to 0.00%), systolic blood pressure was reduced (−7.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, −11.7 to −2.8 mm Hg), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were not affected (−2.3 mg/dL; 95% CI, −14.7 to 10.0 mg/dL). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The distribution of essential medicines at no charge for 1 year increased adherence to treatment with medicines and improved some, but not other, disease-specific surrogate health outcomes. These findings could help inform changes to medicine access policies such as publicly funding essential medicines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02744963
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6784757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67847572019-10-25 Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial Persaud, Navindra Bedard, Michael Boozary, Andrew S. Glazier, Richard H. Gomes, Tara Hwang, Stephen W. Jüni, Peter Law, Michael R. Mamdani, Muhammad M. Manns, Braden J. Martin, Danielle Morgan, Steven G. Oh, Paul I. Pinto, Andrew D. Shah, Baiju R. Sullivan, Frank Umali, Norman Thorpe, Kevin E. Tu, Karen Laupacis, Andreas JAMA Intern Med Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Nonadherence to treatment with medicines is common globally, even for life-saving treatments. Cost is one important barrier to access, and only some jurisdictions provide medicines at no charge to patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether providing essential medicines at no charge to outpatients who reported not being able to afford medicines improves adherence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter, unblinded, parallel, 2-group, superiority, outcomes assessor–blinded, individually randomized clinical trial conducted at 9 primary care sites in Ontario, Canada, enrolled 786 patients between June 1, 2016, and April 28, 2017, who reported cost-related nonadherence. Follow-up occurred at 12 months. The primary analysis was performed using an intention-to-treat principle. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive free medicines on a list of essential medicines in addition to otherwise usual care (n = 395) or usual medicine access and usual care (n = 391). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was adherence to treatment with all medicines that were appropriately prescribed for 1 year. Secondary outcomes were hemoglobin A(1c) level, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels 1 year after randomization in participants taking corresponding medicines. RESULTS: Among the 786 participants analyzed (439 women and 347 men; mean [SD] age, 51.7 [14.3] years), 764 completed the trial. Adherence to treatment with all medicines was higher in those randomized to receive free distribution (151 of 395 [38.2%]) compared with usual access (104 of 391 [26.6%]; difference, 11.6%; 95% CI, 4.9%-18.4%). Control of type 1 and 2 diabetes was not significantly improved by free distribution (hemoglobin A(1c), −0.38%; 95% CI, −0.76% to 0.00%), systolic blood pressure was reduced (−7.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, −11.7 to −2.8 mm Hg), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were not affected (−2.3 mg/dL; 95% CI, −14.7 to 10.0 mg/dL). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The distribution of essential medicines at no charge for 1 year increased adherence to treatment with medicines and improved some, but not other, disease-specific surrogate health outcomes. These findings could help inform changes to medicine access policies such as publicly funding essential medicines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02744963 American Medical Association 2019-10-07 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6784757/ /pubmed/31589276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4472 Text en Copyright 2019 Persaud N et al. JAMA Internal Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Persaud, Navindra
Bedard, Michael
Boozary, Andrew S.
Glazier, Richard H.
Gomes, Tara
Hwang, Stephen W.
Jüni, Peter
Law, Michael R.
Mamdani, Muhammad M.
Manns, Braden J.
Martin, Danielle
Morgan, Steven G.
Oh, Paul I.
Pinto, Andrew D.
Shah, Baiju R.
Sullivan, Frank
Umali, Norman
Thorpe, Kevin E.
Tu, Karen
Laupacis, Andreas
Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial
title Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort effect on treatment adherence of distributing essential medicines at no charge: the clean meds randomized clinical trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31589276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4472
work_keys_str_mv AT persaudnavindra effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bedardmichael effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT boozaryandrews effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT glazierrichardh effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gomestara effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hwangstephenw effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT junipeter effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT lawmichaelr effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mamdanimuhammadm effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mannsbradenj effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT martindanielle effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT morgansteveng effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ohpauli effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pintoandrewd effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT shahbaijur effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sullivanfrank effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT umalinorman effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT thorpekevine effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT tukaren effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT laupacisandreas effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial