Cargando…
Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial
IMPORTANCE: Nonadherence to treatment with medicines is common globally, even for life-saving treatments. Cost is one important barrier to access, and only some jurisdictions provide medicines at no charge to patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether providing essential medicines at no charge to out...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31589276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4472 |
_version_ | 1783457802688135168 |
---|---|
author | Persaud, Navindra Bedard, Michael Boozary, Andrew S. Glazier, Richard H. Gomes, Tara Hwang, Stephen W. Jüni, Peter Law, Michael R. Mamdani, Muhammad M. Manns, Braden J. Martin, Danielle Morgan, Steven G. Oh, Paul I. Pinto, Andrew D. Shah, Baiju R. Sullivan, Frank Umali, Norman Thorpe, Kevin E. Tu, Karen Laupacis, Andreas |
author_facet | Persaud, Navindra Bedard, Michael Boozary, Andrew S. Glazier, Richard H. Gomes, Tara Hwang, Stephen W. Jüni, Peter Law, Michael R. Mamdani, Muhammad M. Manns, Braden J. Martin, Danielle Morgan, Steven G. Oh, Paul I. Pinto, Andrew D. Shah, Baiju R. Sullivan, Frank Umali, Norman Thorpe, Kevin E. Tu, Karen Laupacis, Andreas |
author_sort | Persaud, Navindra |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Nonadherence to treatment with medicines is common globally, even for life-saving treatments. Cost is one important barrier to access, and only some jurisdictions provide medicines at no charge to patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether providing essential medicines at no charge to outpatients who reported not being able to afford medicines improves adherence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter, unblinded, parallel, 2-group, superiority, outcomes assessor–blinded, individually randomized clinical trial conducted at 9 primary care sites in Ontario, Canada, enrolled 786 patients between June 1, 2016, and April 28, 2017, who reported cost-related nonadherence. Follow-up occurred at 12 months. The primary analysis was performed using an intention-to-treat principle. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive free medicines on a list of essential medicines in addition to otherwise usual care (n = 395) or usual medicine access and usual care (n = 391). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was adherence to treatment with all medicines that were appropriately prescribed for 1 year. Secondary outcomes were hemoglobin A(1c) level, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels 1 year after randomization in participants taking corresponding medicines. RESULTS: Among the 786 participants analyzed (439 women and 347 men; mean [SD] age, 51.7 [14.3] years), 764 completed the trial. Adherence to treatment with all medicines was higher in those randomized to receive free distribution (151 of 395 [38.2%]) compared with usual access (104 of 391 [26.6%]; difference, 11.6%; 95% CI, 4.9%-18.4%). Control of type 1 and 2 diabetes was not significantly improved by free distribution (hemoglobin A(1c), −0.38%; 95% CI, −0.76% to 0.00%), systolic blood pressure was reduced (−7.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, −11.7 to −2.8 mm Hg), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were not affected (−2.3 mg/dL; 95% CI, −14.7 to 10.0 mg/dL). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The distribution of essential medicines at no charge for 1 year increased adherence to treatment with medicines and improved some, but not other, disease-specific surrogate health outcomes. These findings could help inform changes to medicine access policies such as publicly funding essential medicines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02744963 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6784757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67847572019-10-25 Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial Persaud, Navindra Bedard, Michael Boozary, Andrew S. Glazier, Richard H. Gomes, Tara Hwang, Stephen W. Jüni, Peter Law, Michael R. Mamdani, Muhammad M. Manns, Braden J. Martin, Danielle Morgan, Steven G. Oh, Paul I. Pinto, Andrew D. Shah, Baiju R. Sullivan, Frank Umali, Norman Thorpe, Kevin E. Tu, Karen Laupacis, Andreas JAMA Intern Med Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Nonadherence to treatment with medicines is common globally, even for life-saving treatments. Cost is one important barrier to access, and only some jurisdictions provide medicines at no charge to patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether providing essential medicines at no charge to outpatients who reported not being able to afford medicines improves adherence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter, unblinded, parallel, 2-group, superiority, outcomes assessor–blinded, individually randomized clinical trial conducted at 9 primary care sites in Ontario, Canada, enrolled 786 patients between June 1, 2016, and April 28, 2017, who reported cost-related nonadherence. Follow-up occurred at 12 months. The primary analysis was performed using an intention-to-treat principle. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive free medicines on a list of essential medicines in addition to otherwise usual care (n = 395) or usual medicine access and usual care (n = 391). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was adherence to treatment with all medicines that were appropriately prescribed for 1 year. Secondary outcomes were hemoglobin A(1c) level, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels 1 year after randomization in participants taking corresponding medicines. RESULTS: Among the 786 participants analyzed (439 women and 347 men; mean [SD] age, 51.7 [14.3] years), 764 completed the trial. Adherence to treatment with all medicines was higher in those randomized to receive free distribution (151 of 395 [38.2%]) compared with usual access (104 of 391 [26.6%]; difference, 11.6%; 95% CI, 4.9%-18.4%). Control of type 1 and 2 diabetes was not significantly improved by free distribution (hemoglobin A(1c), −0.38%; 95% CI, −0.76% to 0.00%), systolic blood pressure was reduced (−7.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, −11.7 to −2.8 mm Hg), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were not affected (−2.3 mg/dL; 95% CI, −14.7 to 10.0 mg/dL). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The distribution of essential medicines at no charge for 1 year increased adherence to treatment with medicines and improved some, but not other, disease-specific surrogate health outcomes. These findings could help inform changes to medicine access policies such as publicly funding essential medicines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02744963 American Medical Association 2019-10-07 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6784757/ /pubmed/31589276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4472 Text en Copyright 2019 Persaud N et al. JAMA Internal Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Persaud, Navindra Bedard, Michael Boozary, Andrew S. Glazier, Richard H. Gomes, Tara Hwang, Stephen W. Jüni, Peter Law, Michael R. Mamdani, Muhammad M. Manns, Braden J. Martin, Danielle Morgan, Steven G. Oh, Paul I. Pinto, Andrew D. Shah, Baiju R. Sullivan, Frank Umali, Norman Thorpe, Kevin E. Tu, Karen Laupacis, Andreas Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Effect on Treatment Adherence of Distributing Essential Medicines at No Charge: The CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | effect on treatment adherence of distributing essential medicines at no charge: the clean meds randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31589276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT persaudnavindra effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT bedardmichael effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT boozaryandrews effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT glazierrichardh effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT gomestara effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT hwangstephenw effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT junipeter effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT lawmichaelr effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT mamdanimuhammadm effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT mannsbradenj effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT martindanielle effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT morgansteveng effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT ohpauli effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT pintoandrewd effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT shahbaijur effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT sullivanfrank effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT umalinorman effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT thorpekevine effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT tukaren effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial AT laupacisandreas effectontreatmentadherenceofdistributingessentialmedicinesatnochargethecleanmedsrandomizedclinicaltrial |