Cargando…

The impact of PEPFAR transition on HIV service delivery at health facilities in Uganda

BACKGROUND: Since 2004, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has played a large role in Uganda’s HIV/AIDS response. To better target resources to high burden regions and facilities, PEPFAR planned to withdraw from 29% of previously-supported health facilities in Uganda between 201...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilhelm, Jess Alan, Qiu, Mary, Paina, Ligia, Colantuoni, Elizabeth, Mukuru, Moses, Ssengooba, Freddie, Bennett, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31596884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223426
_version_ 1783457839558164480
author Wilhelm, Jess Alan
Qiu, Mary
Paina, Ligia
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Mukuru, Moses
Ssengooba, Freddie
Bennett, Sara
author_facet Wilhelm, Jess Alan
Qiu, Mary
Paina, Ligia
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Mukuru, Moses
Ssengooba, Freddie
Bennett, Sara
author_sort Wilhelm, Jess Alan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since 2004, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has played a large role in Uganda’s HIV/AIDS response. To better target resources to high burden regions and facilities, PEPFAR planned to withdraw from 29% of previously-supported health facilities in Uganda between 2015 and 2017. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 226 PEPFAR-supported health facilities in Uganda in mid-2017. The survey gathered information on availability, perceived quality, and access to HIV services before and after transition. We compare responses for facilities transitioned to those maintained on PEPFAR, accounting for survey design. We also extracted data from DHIS2 for the period October 2013–December 2017 on the number of HIV tests and counseling (HTC), number of patients on antiretroviral therapy (Current on ART), and retention on first-line ART (Retention) at 12 months. Using mixed effect models, we compare trends in service volume around the transition period. RESULTS: There were 206 facilities that reported transition and 20 that reported maintenance on PEPFAR. Some facilities reporting transition may have been in a gap between implementing partners. The median transition date was September 2016, nine months prior to the survey. Transition facilities were more likely to discontinue HIV outreach following transition (51.6% vs. 1.4%, p<0.001) and to report declines in HIV care access (43.5% vs. 3.1%, p<0.001) and quality (35.6% vs. 0%, p<0.001). However, transition facilities did not differ in their trends in HIV service volume relative to maintenance facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Transition from PEPFAR resulted in facilities reporting worsening patient access and service quality for HIV care, but there is insufficient evidence to suggest negative impacts on volume of HIV services. Facility respondents’ perceptions about access and quality may be overly pessimistic, or they may signal forthcoming impacts. Unrelated to transition, declining retention on ART in Uganda is a cause for concern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6785126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67851262019-10-19 The impact of PEPFAR transition on HIV service delivery at health facilities in Uganda Wilhelm, Jess Alan Qiu, Mary Paina, Ligia Colantuoni, Elizabeth Mukuru, Moses Ssengooba, Freddie Bennett, Sara PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Since 2004, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has played a large role in Uganda’s HIV/AIDS response. To better target resources to high burden regions and facilities, PEPFAR planned to withdraw from 29% of previously-supported health facilities in Uganda between 2015 and 2017. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 226 PEPFAR-supported health facilities in Uganda in mid-2017. The survey gathered information on availability, perceived quality, and access to HIV services before and after transition. We compare responses for facilities transitioned to those maintained on PEPFAR, accounting for survey design. We also extracted data from DHIS2 for the period October 2013–December 2017 on the number of HIV tests and counseling (HTC), number of patients on antiretroviral therapy (Current on ART), and retention on first-line ART (Retention) at 12 months. Using mixed effect models, we compare trends in service volume around the transition period. RESULTS: There were 206 facilities that reported transition and 20 that reported maintenance on PEPFAR. Some facilities reporting transition may have been in a gap between implementing partners. The median transition date was September 2016, nine months prior to the survey. Transition facilities were more likely to discontinue HIV outreach following transition (51.6% vs. 1.4%, p<0.001) and to report declines in HIV care access (43.5% vs. 3.1%, p<0.001) and quality (35.6% vs. 0%, p<0.001). However, transition facilities did not differ in their trends in HIV service volume relative to maintenance facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Transition from PEPFAR resulted in facilities reporting worsening patient access and service quality for HIV care, but there is insufficient evidence to suggest negative impacts on volume of HIV services. Facility respondents’ perceptions about access and quality may be overly pessimistic, or they may signal forthcoming impacts. Unrelated to transition, declining retention on ART in Uganda is a cause for concern. Public Library of Science 2019-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6785126/ /pubmed/31596884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223426 Text en © 2019 Wilhelm et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilhelm, Jess Alan
Qiu, Mary
Paina, Ligia
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Mukuru, Moses
Ssengooba, Freddie
Bennett, Sara
The impact of PEPFAR transition on HIV service delivery at health facilities in Uganda
title The impact of PEPFAR transition on HIV service delivery at health facilities in Uganda
title_full The impact of PEPFAR transition on HIV service delivery at health facilities in Uganda
title_fullStr The impact of PEPFAR transition on HIV service delivery at health facilities in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed The impact of PEPFAR transition on HIV service delivery at health facilities in Uganda
title_short The impact of PEPFAR transition on HIV service delivery at health facilities in Uganda
title_sort impact of pepfar transition on hiv service delivery at health facilities in uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31596884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223426
work_keys_str_mv AT wilhelmjessalan theimpactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT qiumary theimpactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT painaligia theimpactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT colantuonielizabeth theimpactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT mukurumoses theimpactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT ssengoobafreddie theimpactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT bennettsara theimpactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT wilhelmjessalan impactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT qiumary impactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT painaligia impactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT colantuonielizabeth impactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT mukurumoses impactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT ssengoobafreddie impactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT bennettsara impactofpepfartransitiononhivservicedeliveryathealthfacilitiesinuganda