Cargando…
Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage
BACKGROUND: To explore the effect of radiation on metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT), we examined the metastatic features of LNs according to their inclusion in the radiation field. METHODS: The patient group included 88 men and 2 women, with a mean age of 6...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624713 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.5.353 |
_version_ | 1783457843248103424 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Sang Yoon Park, Samina Park, In Kyu Kim, Young Tae Kang, Chang Hyun |
author_facet | Kim, Sang Yoon Park, Samina Park, In Kyu Kim, Young Tae Kang, Chang Hyun |
author_sort | Kim, Sang Yoon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To explore the effect of radiation on metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT), we examined the metastatic features of LNs according to their inclusion in the radiation field. METHODS: The patient group included 88 men and 2 women, with a mean age of 61.1±8.1 years, who underwent esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy after nCRT. Dissected LNs were compared in terms of clinical suspicion of metastasis, nodal station, and inclusion in the radiation field. RESULTS: LN positivity did not differ between LNs that were inside (in-field [IF]) and outside (out-field [OF]) of the radiation field (IF: 40 of 465 [9%], OF: 40 of 420 [10%]; p=0.313). In clinical N+ nodal stations, IF stations had a lower incidence of metastasis than OF stations (IF/cN+: 16 of 142 [11%], OF/cN+: 9/30 [30%]; p=0.010). However, in clinical N- nodal stations, pathological positivity was not affected by whether the nodal stations were included in the radiation field (IF/cN-: 24 of 323 [7%], OF/cN-: 31 of 390 [8%]; p=0.447). CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy for nCRT could downstage clinically suspected nodal metastasis. However, such therapy was ineffective when used to treat nodes that were not suspicious for metastasis. Because significant numbers of residual metastases were identified irrespective of coverage by the radiation field, lymphadenectomy should be performed to ensure complete removal of residual nodal metastases after nCRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6785163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67851632019-10-17 Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage Kim, Sang Yoon Park, Samina Park, In Kyu Kim, Young Tae Kang, Chang Hyun Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Clinical Research BACKGROUND: To explore the effect of radiation on metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT), we examined the metastatic features of LNs according to their inclusion in the radiation field. METHODS: The patient group included 88 men and 2 women, with a mean age of 61.1±8.1 years, who underwent esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy after nCRT. Dissected LNs were compared in terms of clinical suspicion of metastasis, nodal station, and inclusion in the radiation field. RESULTS: LN positivity did not differ between LNs that were inside (in-field [IF]) and outside (out-field [OF]) of the radiation field (IF: 40 of 465 [9%], OF: 40 of 420 [10%]; p=0.313). In clinical N+ nodal stations, IF stations had a lower incidence of metastasis than OF stations (IF/cN+: 16 of 142 [11%], OF/cN+: 9/30 [30%]; p=0.010). However, in clinical N- nodal stations, pathological positivity was not affected by whether the nodal stations were included in the radiation field (IF/cN-: 24 of 323 [7%], OF/cN-: 31 of 390 [8%]; p=0.447). CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy for nCRT could downstage clinically suspected nodal metastasis. However, such therapy was ineffective when used to treat nodes that were not suspicious for metastasis. Because significant numbers of residual metastases were identified irrespective of coverage by the radiation field, lymphadenectomy should be performed to ensure complete removal of residual nodal metastases after nCRT. The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2019-10 2019-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6785163/ /pubmed/31624713 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.5.353 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. All rights Reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Kim, Sang Yoon Park, Samina Park, In Kyu Kim, Young Tae Kang, Chang Hyun Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage |
title | Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage |
title_full | Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage |
title_fullStr | Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage |
title_full_unstemmed | Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage |
title_short | Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage |
title_sort | lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer according to radiation field coverage |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624713 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.5.353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimsangyoon lymphnodestatusafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationtherapyforesophagealcanceraccordingtoradiationfieldcoverage AT parksamina lymphnodestatusafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationtherapyforesophagealcanceraccordingtoradiationfieldcoverage AT parkinkyu lymphnodestatusafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationtherapyforesophagealcanceraccordingtoradiationfieldcoverage AT kimyoungtae lymphnodestatusafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationtherapyforesophagealcanceraccordingtoradiationfieldcoverage AT kangchanghyun lymphnodestatusafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationtherapyforesophagealcanceraccordingtoradiationfieldcoverage |