Cargando…

Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage

BACKGROUND: To explore the effect of radiation on metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT), we examined the metastatic features of LNs according to their inclusion in the radiation field. METHODS: The patient group included 88 men and 2 women, with a mean age of 6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sang Yoon, Park, Samina, Park, In Kyu, Kim, Young Tae, Kang, Chang Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624713
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.5.353
_version_ 1783457843248103424
author Kim, Sang Yoon
Park, Samina
Park, In Kyu
Kim, Young Tae
Kang, Chang Hyun
author_facet Kim, Sang Yoon
Park, Samina
Park, In Kyu
Kim, Young Tae
Kang, Chang Hyun
author_sort Kim, Sang Yoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To explore the effect of radiation on metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT), we examined the metastatic features of LNs according to their inclusion in the radiation field. METHODS: The patient group included 88 men and 2 women, with a mean age of 61.1±8.1 years, who underwent esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy after nCRT. Dissected LNs were compared in terms of clinical suspicion of metastasis, nodal station, and inclusion in the radiation field. RESULTS: LN positivity did not differ between LNs that were inside (in-field [IF]) and outside (out-field [OF]) of the radiation field (IF: 40 of 465 [9%], OF: 40 of 420 [10%]; p=0.313). In clinical N+ nodal stations, IF stations had a lower incidence of metastasis than OF stations (IF/cN+: 16 of 142 [11%], OF/cN+: 9/30 [30%]; p=0.010). However, in clinical N- nodal stations, pathological positivity was not affected by whether the nodal stations were included in the radiation field (IF/cN-: 24 of 323 [7%], OF/cN-: 31 of 390 [8%]; p=0.447). CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy for nCRT could downstage clinically suspected nodal metastasis. However, such therapy was ineffective when used to treat nodes that were not suspicious for metastasis. Because significant numbers of residual metastases were identified irrespective of coverage by the radiation field, lymphadenectomy should be performed to ensure complete removal of residual nodal metastases after nCRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6785163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67851632019-10-17 Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage Kim, Sang Yoon Park, Samina Park, In Kyu Kim, Young Tae Kang, Chang Hyun Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Clinical Research BACKGROUND: To explore the effect of radiation on metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT), we examined the metastatic features of LNs according to their inclusion in the radiation field. METHODS: The patient group included 88 men and 2 women, with a mean age of 61.1±8.1 years, who underwent esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy after nCRT. Dissected LNs were compared in terms of clinical suspicion of metastasis, nodal station, and inclusion in the radiation field. RESULTS: LN positivity did not differ between LNs that were inside (in-field [IF]) and outside (out-field [OF]) of the radiation field (IF: 40 of 465 [9%], OF: 40 of 420 [10%]; p=0.313). In clinical N+ nodal stations, IF stations had a lower incidence of metastasis than OF stations (IF/cN+: 16 of 142 [11%], OF/cN+: 9/30 [30%]; p=0.010). However, in clinical N- nodal stations, pathological positivity was not affected by whether the nodal stations were included in the radiation field (IF/cN-: 24 of 323 [7%], OF/cN-: 31 of 390 [8%]; p=0.447). CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy for nCRT could downstage clinically suspected nodal metastasis. However, such therapy was ineffective when used to treat nodes that were not suspicious for metastasis. Because significant numbers of residual metastases were identified irrespective of coverage by the radiation field, lymphadenectomy should be performed to ensure complete removal of residual nodal metastases after nCRT. The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2019-10 2019-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6785163/ /pubmed/31624713 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.5.353 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. All rights Reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Kim, Sang Yoon
Park, Samina
Park, In Kyu
Kim, Young Tae
Kang, Chang Hyun
Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage
title Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage
title_full Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage
title_fullStr Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage
title_full_unstemmed Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage
title_short Lymph Node Status after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer according to Radiation Field Coverage
title_sort lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer according to radiation field coverage
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624713
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.5.353
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsangyoon lymphnodestatusafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationtherapyforesophagealcanceraccordingtoradiationfieldcoverage
AT parksamina lymphnodestatusafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationtherapyforesophagealcanceraccordingtoradiationfieldcoverage
AT parkinkyu lymphnodestatusafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationtherapyforesophagealcanceraccordingtoradiationfieldcoverage
AT kimyoungtae lymphnodestatusafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationtherapyforesophagealcanceraccordingtoradiationfieldcoverage
AT kangchanghyun lymphnodestatusafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationtherapyforesophagealcanceraccordingtoradiationfieldcoverage