Cargando…
The Carcinogenome Project: In Vitro Gene Expression Profiling of Chemical Perturbations to Predict Long-Term Carcinogenicity
BACKGROUND: Most chemicals in commerce have not been evaluated for their carcinogenic potential. The de facto gold-standard approach to carcinogen testing adopts the 2-y rodent bioassay, a time-consuming and costly procedure. High-throughput in vitro assays are a promising alternative for addressing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Environmental Health Perspectives
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30964323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP3986 |
_version_ | 1783457852891856896 |
---|---|
author | Li, Amy Lu, Xiaodong Natoli, Ted Bittker, Joshua Sipes, Nisha S. Subramanian, Aravind Auerbach, Scott Sherr, David H. Monti, Stefano |
author_facet | Li, Amy Lu, Xiaodong Natoli, Ted Bittker, Joshua Sipes, Nisha S. Subramanian, Aravind Auerbach, Scott Sherr, David H. Monti, Stefano |
author_sort | Li, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most chemicals in commerce have not been evaluated for their carcinogenic potential. The de facto gold-standard approach to carcinogen testing adopts the 2-y rodent bioassay, a time-consuming and costly procedure. High-throughput in vitro assays are a promising alternative for addressing the limitations in carcinogen screening. OBJECTIVES: We developed a screening process for predicting chemical carcinogenicity and genotoxicity and characterizing modes of actions (MoAs) using in vitro gene expression assays. METHODS: We generated a large toxicogenomics resource comprising [Formula: see text] expression profiles corresponding to 330 chemicals profiled in HepG2 (human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line) at multiple doses and replicates. Predictive models of carcinogenicity and genotoxicity were built using a random forest classifier. Differential pathway enrichment analysis was performed to identify pathways associated with carcinogen exposure. Signatures of carcinogenicity and genotoxicity were compared with external sources, including Drugmatrix and the Connectivity Map. RESULTS: Among profiles with sufficient bioactivity, our classifiers achieved 72.2% Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) for predicting carcinogenicity and 82.3% AUC for predicting genotoxicity. Chemical bioactivity, as measured by the strength and reproducibility of the transcriptional response, was not significantly associated with long-term carcinogenicity in doses up to [Formula: see text]. However, sufficient bioactivity was necessary for a chemical to be used for prediction of carcinogenicity. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed pathways consistent with known pathways that drive cancer, including DNA damage and repair. The data is available at https://clue.io/CRCGN_ABC, and a portal for query and visualization of the results is accessible at https://carcinogenome.org. DISCUSSION: We demonstrated an in vitro screening approach using gene expression profiling to predict carcinogenicity and infer MoAs of chemical perturbations. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3986 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6785232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Environmental Health Perspectives |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67852322019-10-10 The Carcinogenome Project: In Vitro Gene Expression Profiling of Chemical Perturbations to Predict Long-Term Carcinogenicity Li, Amy Lu, Xiaodong Natoli, Ted Bittker, Joshua Sipes, Nisha S. Subramanian, Aravind Auerbach, Scott Sherr, David H. Monti, Stefano Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: Most chemicals in commerce have not been evaluated for their carcinogenic potential. The de facto gold-standard approach to carcinogen testing adopts the 2-y rodent bioassay, a time-consuming and costly procedure. High-throughput in vitro assays are a promising alternative for addressing the limitations in carcinogen screening. OBJECTIVES: We developed a screening process for predicting chemical carcinogenicity and genotoxicity and characterizing modes of actions (MoAs) using in vitro gene expression assays. METHODS: We generated a large toxicogenomics resource comprising [Formula: see text] expression profiles corresponding to 330 chemicals profiled in HepG2 (human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line) at multiple doses and replicates. Predictive models of carcinogenicity and genotoxicity were built using a random forest classifier. Differential pathway enrichment analysis was performed to identify pathways associated with carcinogen exposure. Signatures of carcinogenicity and genotoxicity were compared with external sources, including Drugmatrix and the Connectivity Map. RESULTS: Among profiles with sufficient bioactivity, our classifiers achieved 72.2% Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) for predicting carcinogenicity and 82.3% AUC for predicting genotoxicity. Chemical bioactivity, as measured by the strength and reproducibility of the transcriptional response, was not significantly associated with long-term carcinogenicity in doses up to [Formula: see text]. However, sufficient bioactivity was necessary for a chemical to be used for prediction of carcinogenicity. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed pathways consistent with known pathways that drive cancer, including DNA damage and repair. The data is available at https://clue.io/CRCGN_ABC, and a portal for query and visualization of the results is accessible at https://carcinogenome.org. DISCUSSION: We demonstrated an in vitro screening approach using gene expression profiling to predict carcinogenicity and infer MoAs of chemical perturbations. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3986 Environmental Health Perspectives 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6785232/ /pubmed/30964323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP3986 Text en EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Amy Lu, Xiaodong Natoli, Ted Bittker, Joshua Sipes, Nisha S. Subramanian, Aravind Auerbach, Scott Sherr, David H. Monti, Stefano The Carcinogenome Project: In Vitro Gene Expression Profiling of Chemical Perturbations to Predict Long-Term Carcinogenicity |
title | The Carcinogenome Project: In Vitro Gene Expression Profiling of Chemical Perturbations to Predict Long-Term Carcinogenicity |
title_full | The Carcinogenome Project: In Vitro Gene Expression Profiling of Chemical Perturbations to Predict Long-Term Carcinogenicity |
title_fullStr | The Carcinogenome Project: In Vitro Gene Expression Profiling of Chemical Perturbations to Predict Long-Term Carcinogenicity |
title_full_unstemmed | The Carcinogenome Project: In Vitro Gene Expression Profiling of Chemical Perturbations to Predict Long-Term Carcinogenicity |
title_short | The Carcinogenome Project: In Vitro Gene Expression Profiling of Chemical Perturbations to Predict Long-Term Carcinogenicity |
title_sort | carcinogenome project: in vitro gene expression profiling of chemical perturbations to predict long-term carcinogenicity |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30964323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP3986 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liamy thecarcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT luxiaodong thecarcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT natolited thecarcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT bittkerjoshua thecarcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT sipesnishas thecarcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT subramanianaravind thecarcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT auerbachscott thecarcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT sherrdavidh thecarcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT montistefano thecarcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT liamy carcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT luxiaodong carcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT natolited carcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT bittkerjoshua carcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT sipesnishas carcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT subramanianaravind carcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT auerbachscott carcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT sherrdavidh carcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity AT montistefano carcinogenomeprojectinvitrogeneexpressionprofilingofchemicalperturbationstopredictlongtermcarcinogenicity |