Cargando…
The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception
Nonverbal communication determines much of how we perceive explicit, verbal messages. Facial expressions and social touch, for example, influence affinity and conformity. To understand the interaction between nonverbal and verbal information, we studied how the psychophysiological time-course of sem...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00738-8 |
_version_ | 1783457921227554816 |
---|---|
author | Spapé, Michiel Harjunen, Ville Ahmed, Imtiaj Jacucci, Giulio Ravaja, Niklas |
author_facet | Spapé, Michiel Harjunen, Ville Ahmed, Imtiaj Jacucci, Giulio Ravaja, Niklas |
author_sort | Spapé, Michiel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nonverbal communication determines much of how we perceive explicit, verbal messages. Facial expressions and social touch, for example, influence affinity and conformity. To understand the interaction between nonverbal and verbal information, we studied how the psychophysiological time-course of semiotics—the decoding of the meaning of a message—is altered by interpersonal touch and facial expressions. A virtual-reality-based economic decision-making game, ultimatum, was used to investigate how participants perceived, and responded to, financial offers of variable levels of fairness. In line with previous studies, unfair offers evoked medial frontal negativity (MFN) within the N2 time window, which has been interpreted as reflecting an emotional reaction to violated social norms. Contrary to this emotional interpretation of the MFN, however, nonverbal signals did not modulate the MFN component, only affecting fairness perception during the P3 component. This suggests that the nonverbal context affects the late, but not the early, stage of fairness perception. We discuss the implications of the semiotics of the message and the messenger as a process by which parallel information sources of “who says what” are integrated in reverse order: of the message, then the messenger. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13415-019-00738-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6785596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67855962019-10-17 The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception Spapé, Michiel Harjunen, Ville Ahmed, Imtiaj Jacucci, Giulio Ravaja, Niklas Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Article Nonverbal communication determines much of how we perceive explicit, verbal messages. Facial expressions and social touch, for example, influence affinity and conformity. To understand the interaction between nonverbal and verbal information, we studied how the psychophysiological time-course of semiotics—the decoding of the meaning of a message—is altered by interpersonal touch and facial expressions. A virtual-reality-based economic decision-making game, ultimatum, was used to investigate how participants perceived, and responded to, financial offers of variable levels of fairness. In line with previous studies, unfair offers evoked medial frontal negativity (MFN) within the N2 time window, which has been interpreted as reflecting an emotional reaction to violated social norms. Contrary to this emotional interpretation of the MFN, however, nonverbal signals did not modulate the MFN component, only affecting fairness perception during the P3 component. This suggests that the nonverbal context affects the late, but not the early, stage of fairness perception. We discuss the implications of the semiotics of the message and the messenger as a process by which parallel information sources of “who says what” are integrated in reverse order: of the message, then the messenger. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13415-019-00738-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-07-09 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6785596/ /pubmed/31290016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00738-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Spapé, Michiel Harjunen, Ville Ahmed, Imtiaj Jacucci, Giulio Ravaja, Niklas The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception |
title | The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception |
title_full | The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception |
title_fullStr | The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception |
title_full_unstemmed | The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception |
title_short | The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception |
title_sort | semiotics of the message and the messenger: how nonverbal communication affects fairness perception |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00738-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spapemichiel thesemioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception AT harjunenville thesemioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception AT ahmedimtiaj thesemioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception AT jacuccigiulio thesemioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception AT ravajaniklas thesemioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception AT spapemichiel semioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception AT harjunenville semioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception AT ahmedimtiaj semioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception AT jacuccigiulio semioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception AT ravajaniklas semioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception |