Cargando…

The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception

Nonverbal communication determines much of how we perceive explicit, verbal messages. Facial expressions and social touch, for example, influence affinity and conformity. To understand the interaction between nonverbal and verbal information, we studied how the psychophysiological time-course of sem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spapé, Michiel, Harjunen, Ville, Ahmed, Imtiaj, Jacucci, Giulio, Ravaja, Niklas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290016
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00738-8
_version_ 1783457921227554816
author Spapé, Michiel
Harjunen, Ville
Ahmed, Imtiaj
Jacucci, Giulio
Ravaja, Niklas
author_facet Spapé, Michiel
Harjunen, Ville
Ahmed, Imtiaj
Jacucci, Giulio
Ravaja, Niklas
author_sort Spapé, Michiel
collection PubMed
description Nonverbal communication determines much of how we perceive explicit, verbal messages. Facial expressions and social touch, for example, influence affinity and conformity. To understand the interaction between nonverbal and verbal information, we studied how the psychophysiological time-course of semiotics—the decoding of the meaning of a message—is altered by interpersonal touch and facial expressions. A virtual-reality-based economic decision-making game, ultimatum, was used to investigate how participants perceived, and responded to, financial offers of variable levels of fairness. In line with previous studies, unfair offers evoked medial frontal negativity (MFN) within the N2 time window, which has been interpreted as reflecting an emotional reaction to violated social norms. Contrary to this emotional interpretation of the MFN, however, nonverbal signals did not modulate the MFN component, only affecting fairness perception during the P3 component. This suggests that the nonverbal context affects the late, but not the early, stage of fairness perception. We discuss the implications of the semiotics of the message and the messenger as a process by which parallel information sources of “who says what” are integrated in reverse order: of the message, then the messenger. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13415-019-00738-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6785596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67855962019-10-17 The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception Spapé, Michiel Harjunen, Ville Ahmed, Imtiaj Jacucci, Giulio Ravaja, Niklas Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Article Nonverbal communication determines much of how we perceive explicit, verbal messages. Facial expressions and social touch, for example, influence affinity and conformity. To understand the interaction between nonverbal and verbal information, we studied how the psychophysiological time-course of semiotics—the decoding of the meaning of a message—is altered by interpersonal touch and facial expressions. A virtual-reality-based economic decision-making game, ultimatum, was used to investigate how participants perceived, and responded to, financial offers of variable levels of fairness. In line with previous studies, unfair offers evoked medial frontal negativity (MFN) within the N2 time window, which has been interpreted as reflecting an emotional reaction to violated social norms. Contrary to this emotional interpretation of the MFN, however, nonverbal signals did not modulate the MFN component, only affecting fairness perception during the P3 component. This suggests that the nonverbal context affects the late, but not the early, stage of fairness perception. We discuss the implications of the semiotics of the message and the messenger as a process by which parallel information sources of “who says what” are integrated in reverse order: of the message, then the messenger. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13415-019-00738-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-07-09 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6785596/ /pubmed/31290016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00738-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Spapé, Michiel
Harjunen, Ville
Ahmed, Imtiaj
Jacucci, Giulio
Ravaja, Niklas
The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception
title The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception
title_full The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception
title_fullStr The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception
title_full_unstemmed The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception
title_short The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception
title_sort semiotics of the message and the messenger: how nonverbal communication affects fairness perception
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290016
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00738-8
work_keys_str_mv AT spapemichiel thesemioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception
AT harjunenville thesemioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception
AT ahmedimtiaj thesemioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception
AT jacuccigiulio thesemioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception
AT ravajaniklas thesemioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception
AT spapemichiel semioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception
AT harjunenville semioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception
AT ahmedimtiaj semioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception
AT jacuccigiulio semioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception
AT ravajaniklas semioticsofthemessageandthemessengerhownonverbalcommunicationaffectsfairnessperception