Cargando…

Association between metabolic syndrome and the incidence of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies

BACKGROUND: Previous studies investigating the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and incidence of gastric cancer (GC) showed inconsistent results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of MetS on GC risk in a meta-analysis. METHODS: Cohort studies that evaluating the associa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhibin, Han, Hongfeng, Chang, Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-019-0478-y
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Previous studies investigating the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and incidence of gastric cancer (GC) showed inconsistent results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of MetS on GC risk in a meta-analysis. METHODS: Cohort studies that evaluating the association between MetS and GC were identified via systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Pooled analyses were performed via a random-effect model or a fixed effect model according to the heterogeneity among the studies. Predefined subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate whether gender or ethnic group of the patients affected the results. RESULTS: Overall, eight cohort studies with 8,745,671 participants were included, and 37,245 GC cases occurred during follow-up. Results showed that MetS defined by the revised National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adults Treatment Panel III criteria was not associated with a significantly affected GC risk (adjusted risk ratio [RR]: 1.03, p = 0.59; I(2) = 79%). Subgroup analyses showed that MetS was not associated with a significantly affected risk of GC in male or female patients, and in Asians or Caucasians. Moreover, meta-analysis of four datasets showed that MetS defined by the International Diabetes Federation criteria was also not associated with a significant affected risk of GC (adjusted RR: 0.80, p = 0.05; I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that current evidence from epidemiological studies does not support that patients with MetS are at higher risk for the development of GC.