Cargando…
Getting the most from after action reviews to improve global health security
BACKGROUND: After Action Reviews (AARs) provide a means to observe how well preparedness systems perform in real world conditions and can help to identify – and address – gaps in national and global public health emergency preparedness (PHEP) systems. WHO has recently published guidance for voluntar...
Autores principales: | Stoto, Michael A., Nelson, Christopher, Piltch-Loeb, Rachael, Mayigane, Landry Ndriko, Copper, Frederik, Chungong, Stella |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6785939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31601233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0500-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Preparing for COVID-19 vaccine roll-out through simulation exercises
por: Copper, Frederik A, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
7-1-7: the promise of tangible results through agility and accountability
por: Mayigane, Landry Ndriko, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Simulation exercises and after action reviews – analysis of outputs during 2016–2019 to strengthen global health emergency preparedness and response
por: Copper, Frederik Anton, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The necessity for intra-action reviews during the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Mayigane, Landry Ndriko, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Validating Joint External Evaluation reports with the quality of outbreak response in Ethiopia, Nigeria and Madagascar
por: Garfield, Richard, et al.
Publicado: (2019)