Cargando…

Prognostic significance of inflammation-based prognostic scoring in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether Glasgow Prognostic Score has prognostic significance in patients with upper urinary urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 74 patients with upper urinary urothelial carcinoma. We set the cut-off value for C-r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suyama, Taisuke, Kanbe, Shigeki, Maegawa, Masanobu, Shimizu, Hirofumi, Nakajima, Koichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31038863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0251
_version_ 1783458006730539008
author Suyama, Taisuke
Kanbe, Shigeki
Maegawa, Masanobu
Shimizu, Hirofumi
Nakajima, Koichi
author_facet Suyama, Taisuke
Kanbe, Shigeki
Maegawa, Masanobu
Shimizu, Hirofumi
Nakajima, Koichi
author_sort Suyama, Taisuke
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether Glasgow Prognostic Score has prognostic significance in patients with upper urinary urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 74 patients with upper urinary urothelial carcinoma. We set the cut-off value for C-reactive protein as 1.0mg/dL, and 3.5mg/dL for albumin as Glasgow Prognostic Score. Their blood data including albumin and C-reactive protein for Glasgow Prognostic Score and cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 as a tumor marker were measured before starting treatment. The patients were stratified into three groups with Glasgow Prognostic Score: The Group-1, albumin ≥3.5g/dL and C-reactive protein < 1.0mg/dL; Group-2, albumin < 3.5g/dL or C-reactive protein ≥1.0mg/dL; Group-3, albumin < 3.5g/dL and C-reactive protein ≥1.0mg/dL. RESULTS: The median follow-up for all patients was 26.9 months (range: 10.9-91.1 months), during which 37 (50%) patients died. There was a significant difference in the estimated survival rate among the 3 groups stratified by Glasgow Prognostic Score. The estimated survival rate in the Group-1 was significantly higher than those in Groups 2 and 3. In the univariate analysis C-reactive protein, serum cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 and Glasgow Prognostic Score were significant predictors of overall survival. On the multivariate analysis, serum cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 and Glasgow Prognostic Score were independently associated with shorter overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our review suggests Glasgow Prognostic Score may play as a prognostic predictor for upper urinary urothelial carcinoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6786111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67861112019-10-23 Prognostic significance of inflammation-based prognostic scoring in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma Suyama, Taisuke Kanbe, Shigeki Maegawa, Masanobu Shimizu, Hirofumi Nakajima, Koichi Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether Glasgow Prognostic Score has prognostic significance in patients with upper urinary urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 74 patients with upper urinary urothelial carcinoma. We set the cut-off value for C-reactive protein as 1.0mg/dL, and 3.5mg/dL for albumin as Glasgow Prognostic Score. Their blood data including albumin and C-reactive protein for Glasgow Prognostic Score and cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 as a tumor marker were measured before starting treatment. The patients were stratified into three groups with Glasgow Prognostic Score: The Group-1, albumin ≥3.5g/dL and C-reactive protein < 1.0mg/dL; Group-2, albumin < 3.5g/dL or C-reactive protein ≥1.0mg/dL; Group-3, albumin < 3.5g/dL and C-reactive protein ≥1.0mg/dL. RESULTS: The median follow-up for all patients was 26.9 months (range: 10.9-91.1 months), during which 37 (50%) patients died. There was a significant difference in the estimated survival rate among the 3 groups stratified by Glasgow Prognostic Score. The estimated survival rate in the Group-1 was significantly higher than those in Groups 2 and 3. In the univariate analysis C-reactive protein, serum cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 and Glasgow Prognostic Score were significant predictors of overall survival. On the multivariate analysis, serum cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 and Glasgow Prognostic Score were independently associated with shorter overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our review suggests Glasgow Prognostic Score may play as a prognostic predictor for upper urinary urothelial carcinoma. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2019-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6786111/ /pubmed/31038863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0251 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Suyama, Taisuke
Kanbe, Shigeki
Maegawa, Masanobu
Shimizu, Hirofumi
Nakajima, Koichi
Prognostic significance of inflammation-based prognostic scoring in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
title Prognostic significance of inflammation-based prognostic scoring in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
title_full Prognostic significance of inflammation-based prognostic scoring in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
title_fullStr Prognostic significance of inflammation-based prognostic scoring in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic significance of inflammation-based prognostic scoring in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
title_short Prognostic significance of inflammation-based prognostic scoring in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
title_sort prognostic significance of inflammation-based prognostic scoring in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31038863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0251
work_keys_str_mv AT suyamataisuke prognosticsignificanceofinflammationbasedprognosticscoringinpatientswithupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma
AT kanbeshigeki prognosticsignificanceofinflammationbasedprognosticscoringinpatientswithupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma
AT maegawamasanobu prognosticsignificanceofinflammationbasedprognosticscoringinpatientswithupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma
AT shimizuhirofumi prognosticsignificanceofinflammationbasedprognosticscoringinpatientswithupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma
AT nakajimakoichi prognosticsignificanceofinflammationbasedprognosticscoringinpatientswithupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma