Cargando…

Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children?

OBJECTIVE: Pyeloplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). However, the failure rate of pyeloplasty is as high as 10% and repeat pyeloplasty is more difficult. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of balloon dilatation for failed pyeloplasty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duan, Haifeng, Zhu, Wei, Zhong, Wen, Li, Xiaohang, Zeng, Guohua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30676306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0407
_version_ 1783458008616927232
author Duan, Haifeng
Zhu, Wei
Zhong, Wen
Li, Xiaohang
Zeng, Guohua
author_facet Duan, Haifeng
Zhu, Wei
Zhong, Wen
Li, Xiaohang
Zeng, Guohua
author_sort Duan, Haifeng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Pyeloplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). However, the failure rate of pyeloplasty is as high as 10% and repeat pyeloplasty is more difficult. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of balloon dilatation for failed pyeloplasty in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, 15 patients, aged 6 months to 14 years, were treated with balloon dilation for restenosis of UPJO after a failed pyeloplasty. Ultrasound and intravenous urography were used to evaluate the primary outcome. Success was defined as the relief of symptoms and improvement of hydronephrosis, which was identified by ultrasound at the last follow-up. RESULTS: All patients successfully completed the operation, 13 patients by retrograde approach and 2 patients by antegrade approach. Thirteen patients were followed for a median of 15 (4 to 57) months and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. Resolution of the hydronephrosis was observed in 5 cases. The anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the pelvis decreased by an average of 12.4 ± 14.4mm. Eight patients needed another surgery. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.78 ± 1.4 days. Two patients experienced fever after balloon dilation. No other complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon dilatation surgery is safe for children, but it is not recommended for failed pyeloplasty in that group of patients, owing to the low success rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6786119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67861192019-10-23 Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children? Duan, Haifeng Zhu, Wei Zhong, Wen Li, Xiaohang Zeng, Guohua Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Pyeloplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). However, the failure rate of pyeloplasty is as high as 10% and repeat pyeloplasty is more difficult. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of balloon dilatation for failed pyeloplasty in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, 15 patients, aged 6 months to 14 years, were treated with balloon dilation for restenosis of UPJO after a failed pyeloplasty. Ultrasound and intravenous urography were used to evaluate the primary outcome. Success was defined as the relief of symptoms and improvement of hydronephrosis, which was identified by ultrasound at the last follow-up. RESULTS: All patients successfully completed the operation, 13 patients by retrograde approach and 2 patients by antegrade approach. Thirteen patients were followed for a median of 15 (4 to 57) months and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. Resolution of the hydronephrosis was observed in 5 cases. The anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the pelvis decreased by an average of 12.4 ± 14.4mm. Eight patients needed another surgery. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.78 ± 1.4 days. Two patients experienced fever after balloon dilation. No other complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon dilatation surgery is safe for children, but it is not recommended for failed pyeloplasty in that group of patients, owing to the low success rate. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2019-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6786119/ /pubmed/30676306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0407 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Duan, Haifeng
Zhu, Wei
Zhong, Wen
Li, Xiaohang
Zeng, Guohua
Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children?
title Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children?
title_full Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children?
title_fullStr Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children?
title_full_unstemmed Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children?
title_short Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children?
title_sort balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30676306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0407
work_keys_str_mv AT duanhaifeng balloondilationforfailedpyeloplastyinchildren
AT zhuwei balloondilationforfailedpyeloplastyinchildren
AT zhongwen balloondilationforfailedpyeloplastyinchildren
AT lixiaohang balloondilationforfailedpyeloplastyinchildren
AT zengguohua balloondilationforfailedpyeloplastyinchildren