Cargando…
Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children?
OBJECTIVE: Pyeloplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). However, the failure rate of pyeloplasty is as high as 10% and repeat pyeloplasty is more difficult. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of balloon dilatation for failed pyeloplasty...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30676306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0407 |
_version_ | 1783458008616927232 |
---|---|
author | Duan, Haifeng Zhu, Wei Zhong, Wen Li, Xiaohang Zeng, Guohua |
author_facet | Duan, Haifeng Zhu, Wei Zhong, Wen Li, Xiaohang Zeng, Guohua |
author_sort | Duan, Haifeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Pyeloplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). However, the failure rate of pyeloplasty is as high as 10% and repeat pyeloplasty is more difficult. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of balloon dilatation for failed pyeloplasty in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, 15 patients, aged 6 months to 14 years, were treated with balloon dilation for restenosis of UPJO after a failed pyeloplasty. Ultrasound and intravenous urography were used to evaluate the primary outcome. Success was defined as the relief of symptoms and improvement of hydronephrosis, which was identified by ultrasound at the last follow-up. RESULTS: All patients successfully completed the operation, 13 patients by retrograde approach and 2 patients by antegrade approach. Thirteen patients were followed for a median of 15 (4 to 57) months and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. Resolution of the hydronephrosis was observed in 5 cases. The anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the pelvis decreased by an average of 12.4 ± 14.4mm. Eight patients needed another surgery. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.78 ± 1.4 days. Two patients experienced fever after balloon dilation. No other complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon dilatation surgery is safe for children, but it is not recommended for failed pyeloplasty in that group of patients, owing to the low success rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6786119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67861192019-10-23 Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children? Duan, Haifeng Zhu, Wei Zhong, Wen Li, Xiaohang Zeng, Guohua Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Pyeloplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). However, the failure rate of pyeloplasty is as high as 10% and repeat pyeloplasty is more difficult. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of balloon dilatation for failed pyeloplasty in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, 15 patients, aged 6 months to 14 years, were treated with balloon dilation for restenosis of UPJO after a failed pyeloplasty. Ultrasound and intravenous urography were used to evaluate the primary outcome. Success was defined as the relief of symptoms and improvement of hydronephrosis, which was identified by ultrasound at the last follow-up. RESULTS: All patients successfully completed the operation, 13 patients by retrograde approach and 2 patients by antegrade approach. Thirteen patients were followed for a median of 15 (4 to 57) months and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. Resolution of the hydronephrosis was observed in 5 cases. The anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the pelvis decreased by an average of 12.4 ± 14.4mm. Eight patients needed another surgery. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.78 ± 1.4 days. Two patients experienced fever after balloon dilation. No other complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon dilatation surgery is safe for children, but it is not recommended for failed pyeloplasty in that group of patients, owing to the low success rate. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2019-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6786119/ /pubmed/30676306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0407 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Duan, Haifeng Zhu, Wei Zhong, Wen Li, Xiaohang Zeng, Guohua Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children? |
title | Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children? |
title_full | Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children? |
title_fullStr | Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children? |
title_full_unstemmed | Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children? |
title_short | Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children? |
title_sort | balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30676306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0407 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duanhaifeng balloondilationforfailedpyeloplastyinchildren AT zhuwei balloondilationforfailedpyeloplastyinchildren AT zhongwen balloondilationforfailedpyeloplastyinchildren AT lixiaohang balloondilationforfailedpyeloplastyinchildren AT zengguohua balloondilationforfailedpyeloplastyinchildren |