Cargando…

Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Rapid Response Team Activations

BACKGROUND: To ensure patient safety and improvements in the quality of hospital care, rapid response teams (RRTs) have been implemented in many countries, including Korea. The goal of an RRT is early identification and response to clinical deterioration in patients. However, there are differences i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sei Won, Lee, Hwa Young, Han, Mi Ra, Lee, Yong Suk, Kang, Eun Hyoung, Jang, Eun Ju, Jeun, Keum Sook, Kim, Seok Chan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723626
http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2017.00199
_version_ 1783458124470943744
author Kim, Sei Won
Lee, Hwa Young
Han, Mi Ra
Lee, Yong Suk
Kang, Eun Hyoung
Jang, Eun Ju
Jeun, Keum Sook
Kim, Seok Chan
author_facet Kim, Sei Won
Lee, Hwa Young
Han, Mi Ra
Lee, Yong Suk
Kang, Eun Hyoung
Jang, Eun Ju
Jeun, Keum Sook
Kim, Seok Chan
author_sort Kim, Sei Won
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To ensure patient safety and improvements in the quality of hospital care, rapid response teams (RRTs) have been implemented in many countries, including Korea. The goal of an RRT is early identification and response to clinical deterioration in patients. However, there are differences in RRT systems among hospitals and limited data are available. METHODS: In Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, the St. Mary’s Advanced Life Support Team was implemented in June 2013. We retrospectively reviewed the RRT activation records of 287 cases from June 2013 to December 2016. RESULTS: The median response time and median modified early warning score were 8.6 minutes (interquartile range, 5.6 to 11.6 minutes) and 5.0 points (interquartile range, 4.0 to 7.0 points), respectively. Residents (35.8%) and nurses (59.1%) were the main activators of the RRT. Interestingly, postoperative patients account for a large percentage of the RRT activation cases (69.3%). The survival rate was 83.6% and survival was mainly associated with malignancy, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score, and the time from admission to RRT activation. RRT activation with screening showed a better outcome compared to activation via a phone call in terms of the intensive care unit admission rate and length of hospital stay after RRT activation. CONCLUSIONS: Malignancy was the most important factor related to survival. In addition, RRT activation with patient screening showed a better outcome compared to activation via a phone call. Further studies are needed to determine the effective screening criteria and improve the quality of the RRT system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6786712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67867122019-11-13 Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Rapid Response Team Activations Kim, Sei Won Lee, Hwa Young Han, Mi Ra Lee, Yong Suk Kang, Eun Hyoung Jang, Eun Ju Jeun, Keum Sook Kim, Seok Chan Korean J Crit Care Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To ensure patient safety and improvements in the quality of hospital care, rapid response teams (RRTs) have been implemented in many countries, including Korea. The goal of an RRT is early identification and response to clinical deterioration in patients. However, there are differences in RRT systems among hospitals and limited data are available. METHODS: In Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, the St. Mary’s Advanced Life Support Team was implemented in June 2013. We retrospectively reviewed the RRT activation records of 287 cases from June 2013 to December 2016. RESULTS: The median response time and median modified early warning score were 8.6 minutes (interquartile range, 5.6 to 11.6 minutes) and 5.0 points (interquartile range, 4.0 to 7.0 points), respectively. Residents (35.8%) and nurses (59.1%) were the main activators of the RRT. Interestingly, postoperative patients account for a large percentage of the RRT activation cases (69.3%). The survival rate was 83.6% and survival was mainly associated with malignancy, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score, and the time from admission to RRT activation. RRT activation with screening showed a better outcome compared to activation via a phone call in terms of the intensive care unit admission rate and length of hospital stay after RRT activation. CONCLUSIONS: Malignancy was the most important factor related to survival. In addition, RRT activation with patient screening showed a better outcome compared to activation via a phone call. Further studies are needed to determine the effective screening criteria and improve the quality of the RRT system. Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2017-05 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6786712/ /pubmed/31723626 http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2017.00199 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Sei Won
Lee, Hwa Young
Han, Mi Ra
Lee, Yong Suk
Kang, Eun Hyoung
Jang, Eun Ju
Jeun, Keum Sook
Kim, Seok Chan
Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Rapid Response Team Activations
title Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Rapid Response Team Activations
title_full Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Rapid Response Team Activations
title_fullStr Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Rapid Response Team Activations
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Rapid Response Team Activations
title_short Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Rapid Response Team Activations
title_sort epidemiology and clinical characteristics of rapid response team activations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723626
http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2017.00199
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseiwon epidemiologyandclinicalcharacteristicsofrapidresponseteamactivations
AT leehwayoung epidemiologyandclinicalcharacteristicsofrapidresponseteamactivations
AT hanmira epidemiologyandclinicalcharacteristicsofrapidresponseteamactivations
AT leeyongsuk epidemiologyandclinicalcharacteristicsofrapidresponseteamactivations
AT kangeunhyoung epidemiologyandclinicalcharacteristicsofrapidresponseteamactivations
AT jangeunju epidemiologyandclinicalcharacteristicsofrapidresponseteamactivations
AT jeunkeumsook epidemiologyandclinicalcharacteristicsofrapidresponseteamactivations
AT kimseokchan epidemiologyandclinicalcharacteristicsofrapidresponseteamactivations