Cargando…
Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field
In a complex auditory scene, signals of interest can be distinguished from masking sounds by differences in source location [spatial release from masking (SRM)] and by differences between masker-alone and masker-plus-signal envelopes. This study investigated interactions between those factors in rel...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Acoustical Society of America
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29289075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5014053 |
_version_ | 1783458153876160512 |
---|---|
author | Middlebrooks, John C. |
author_facet | Middlebrooks, John C. |
author_sort | Middlebrooks, John C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In a complex auditory scene, signals of interest can be distinguished from masking sounds by differences in source location [spatial release from masking (SRM)] and by differences between masker-alone and masker-plus-signal envelopes. This study investigated interactions between those factors in release of masking of 700-Hz tones in an open sound field. Signal and masker sources were colocated in front of the listener, or the signal source was shifted 90° to the side. In Experiment 1, the masker contained a 25-Hz-wide on-signal band plus flanking bands having envelopes that were either mutually uncorrelated or were comodulated. Comodulation masking release (CMR) was largely independent of signal location at a higher masker sound level, but at a lower level CMR was reduced for the lateral signal location. In Experiment 2, a brief signal was positioned at the envelope maximum (peak) or minimum (dip) of a 50-Hz-wide on-signal masker. Masking was released in dip more than in peak conditions only for the 90° signal. Overall, open-field SRM was greater in magnitude than binaural masking release reported in comparable closed-field studies, and envelope-related release was somewhat weaker. Mutual enhancement of masking release by spatial and envelope-related effects tended to increase with increasing masker level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6786890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Acoustical Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67868902019-10-11 Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field Middlebrooks, John C. J Acoust Soc Am Psychological and Physiological Acoustics In a complex auditory scene, signals of interest can be distinguished from masking sounds by differences in source location [spatial release from masking (SRM)] and by differences between masker-alone and masker-plus-signal envelopes. This study investigated interactions between those factors in release of masking of 700-Hz tones in an open sound field. Signal and masker sources were colocated in front of the listener, or the signal source was shifted 90° to the side. In Experiment 1, the masker contained a 25-Hz-wide on-signal band plus flanking bands having envelopes that were either mutually uncorrelated or were comodulated. Comodulation masking release (CMR) was largely independent of signal location at a higher masker sound level, but at a lower level CMR was reduced for the lateral signal location. In Experiment 2, a brief signal was positioned at the envelope maximum (peak) or minimum (dip) of a 50-Hz-wide on-signal masker. Masking was released in dip more than in peak conditions only for the 90° signal. Overall, open-field SRM was greater in magnitude than binaural masking release reported in comparable closed-field studies, and envelope-related release was somewhat weaker. Mutual enhancement of masking release by spatial and envelope-related effects tended to increase with increasing masker level. Acoustical Society of America 2017-12 2017-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6786890/ /pubmed/29289075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5014053 Text en © 2017 Acoustical Society of America. 0001-4966/2017/142(6)/3362/14 All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Psychological and Physiological Acoustics Middlebrooks, John C. Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field |
title | Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field |
title_full | Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field |
title_fullStr | Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field |
title_full_unstemmed | Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field |
title_short | Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field |
title_sort | masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field |
topic | Psychological and Physiological Acoustics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29289075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5014053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT middlebrooksjohnc maskingreleasebycombinedspatialandmaskerfluctuationeffectsintheopensoundfield |