Cargando…
Characterization of canine anti-mouse antibodies highlights that multiple strategies are needed to combat immunoassay interference
Immunoassays are widely used for detection and quantification of analytes in biological samples, but are vulnerable to analytical errors caused by interfering sample substances. Of particular interest are endogenous anti-animal antibodies that may bind to the immunoassay antibodies and cause erroneo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31601945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51228-3 |
_version_ | 1783458174006722560 |
---|---|
author | Bergman, Daniel Larsson, Anders Hansson-Hamlin, Helene Åhlén, Emma Holst, Bodil Ström |
author_facet | Bergman, Daniel Larsson, Anders Hansson-Hamlin, Helene Åhlén, Emma Holst, Bodil Ström |
author_sort | Bergman, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Immunoassays are widely used for detection and quantification of analytes in biological samples, but are vulnerable to analytical errors caused by interfering sample substances. Of particular interest are endogenous anti-animal antibodies that may bind to the immunoassay antibodies and cause erroneous test results. This phenomenon is a hazard to patient safety in both human and veterinary medicine. Here, we demonstrate that anti-mouse antibodies in dogs bind selectively to different regions of the murine IgG molecule, cross-react with IgG from different species, and consist of all major antibody classes present in canine serum (IgA, IgG and IgM). The antibody characteristics varied among individuals and their prevalence differed between two dog breeds. The selective binding to different IgG regions suggests that the antibodies might not originate from immunization through exposure to mice or other species. These findings show that canine anti-mouse antibodies are highly heterogeneous in nature and therefore require a combination of strategies to be counteracted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6787031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67870312019-10-17 Characterization of canine anti-mouse antibodies highlights that multiple strategies are needed to combat immunoassay interference Bergman, Daniel Larsson, Anders Hansson-Hamlin, Helene Åhlén, Emma Holst, Bodil Ström Sci Rep Article Immunoassays are widely used for detection and quantification of analytes in biological samples, but are vulnerable to analytical errors caused by interfering sample substances. Of particular interest are endogenous anti-animal antibodies that may bind to the immunoassay antibodies and cause erroneous test results. This phenomenon is a hazard to patient safety in both human and veterinary medicine. Here, we demonstrate that anti-mouse antibodies in dogs bind selectively to different regions of the murine IgG molecule, cross-react with IgG from different species, and consist of all major antibody classes present in canine serum (IgA, IgG and IgM). The antibody characteristics varied among individuals and their prevalence differed between two dog breeds. The selective binding to different IgG regions suggests that the antibodies might not originate from immunization through exposure to mice or other species. These findings show that canine anti-mouse antibodies are highly heterogeneous in nature and therefore require a combination of strategies to be counteracted. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6787031/ /pubmed/31601945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51228-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Bergman, Daniel Larsson, Anders Hansson-Hamlin, Helene Åhlén, Emma Holst, Bodil Ström Characterization of canine anti-mouse antibodies highlights that multiple strategies are needed to combat immunoassay interference |
title | Characterization of canine anti-mouse antibodies highlights that multiple strategies are needed to combat immunoassay interference |
title_full | Characterization of canine anti-mouse antibodies highlights that multiple strategies are needed to combat immunoassay interference |
title_fullStr | Characterization of canine anti-mouse antibodies highlights that multiple strategies are needed to combat immunoassay interference |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterization of canine anti-mouse antibodies highlights that multiple strategies are needed to combat immunoassay interference |
title_short | Characterization of canine anti-mouse antibodies highlights that multiple strategies are needed to combat immunoassay interference |
title_sort | characterization of canine anti-mouse antibodies highlights that multiple strategies are needed to combat immunoassay interference |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31601945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51228-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergmandaniel characterizationofcanineantimouseantibodieshighlightsthatmultiplestrategiesareneededtocombatimmunoassayinterference AT larssonanders characterizationofcanineantimouseantibodieshighlightsthatmultiplestrategiesareneededtocombatimmunoassayinterference AT hanssonhamlinhelene characterizationofcanineantimouseantibodieshighlightsthatmultiplestrategiesareneededtocombatimmunoassayinterference AT ahlenemma characterizationofcanineantimouseantibodieshighlightsthatmultiplestrategiesareneededtocombatimmunoassayinterference AT holstbodilstrom characterizationofcanineantimouseantibodieshighlightsthatmultiplestrategiesareneededtocombatimmunoassayinterference |