Cargando…

A Library Screening Strategy Combining the Concepts of MS Binding Assays and Affinity Selection Mass Spectrometry

The primary objective of early drug development is to identify hits and leads for a target of interest. To achieve this aim, rapid, and reliable screening techniques for a huge number of compounds are needed. Mass spectrometry based binding assays (MS Binding Assays) represent a well-established tec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gabriel, Jürgen, Höfner, Georg, Wanner, Klaus T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637233
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00665
_version_ 1783458268639657984
author Gabriel, Jürgen
Höfner, Georg
Wanner, Klaus T.
author_facet Gabriel, Jürgen
Höfner, Georg
Wanner, Klaus T.
author_sort Gabriel, Jürgen
collection PubMed
description The primary objective of early drug development is to identify hits and leads for a target of interest. To achieve this aim, rapid, and reliable screening techniques for a huge number of compounds are needed. Mass spectrometry based binding assays (MS Binding Assays) represent a well-established technique for library screening based on competitive binding experiments revealing active sublibraries due to reduced binding of a reporter ligand and following hit identification for active libraries by deconvolution in further competitive binding experiments. In the present study, we combined the concepts of MS Binding Assays and affinity selection mass spectrometry (ASMS) to improve the efficiency of the hit identification step. In that case, only a single competitive binding experiment is performed that is in the first step analyzed for reduced binding of the reporter ligand and—only if a sublibrary is active—additionally for specific binding of individual library components. Subsequently, affinities of identified hits as well as activities of reduced sublibraries (i.e., all sublibrary components without hit) are assessed in additional competitive binding experiments. We exemplified this screening concept for the identification of ligands addressing the most widespread GABA transporter subtype in the brain (GAT1) studying in the beginning a library composed of 128 and further on a library of 1,280 well-characterized GAT1 inhibitors, drug substances, and pharmacological tool compounds. Determination of sublibraries' activities was done by quantification of bound NO711 as reporter ligand and hit identification for the active ones achieved in a further LC-ESI-MS/MS run in the multiple reaction monitoring mode enabling detection of all sublibrary components followed by hit verification and investigation of reduced sublibraries in further competitive binding experiments. In this way, we could demonstrate that all GAT1 inhibitors reducing reporter ligand binding below 50% at a concentration of 1 μM are detected reliably without generation of false positive or false negative hits. As the described strategy is apart from its reliability also highly efficient, it can be assumed to become a valuable tool in early drug research, especially for membrane integrated drug targets that are often posing problems in established screening techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6787468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67874682019-10-21 A Library Screening Strategy Combining the Concepts of MS Binding Assays and Affinity Selection Mass Spectrometry Gabriel, Jürgen Höfner, Georg Wanner, Klaus T. Front Chem Chemistry The primary objective of early drug development is to identify hits and leads for a target of interest. To achieve this aim, rapid, and reliable screening techniques for a huge number of compounds are needed. Mass spectrometry based binding assays (MS Binding Assays) represent a well-established technique for library screening based on competitive binding experiments revealing active sublibraries due to reduced binding of a reporter ligand and following hit identification for active libraries by deconvolution in further competitive binding experiments. In the present study, we combined the concepts of MS Binding Assays and affinity selection mass spectrometry (ASMS) to improve the efficiency of the hit identification step. In that case, only a single competitive binding experiment is performed that is in the first step analyzed for reduced binding of the reporter ligand and—only if a sublibrary is active—additionally for specific binding of individual library components. Subsequently, affinities of identified hits as well as activities of reduced sublibraries (i.e., all sublibrary components without hit) are assessed in additional competitive binding experiments. We exemplified this screening concept for the identification of ligands addressing the most widespread GABA transporter subtype in the brain (GAT1) studying in the beginning a library composed of 128 and further on a library of 1,280 well-characterized GAT1 inhibitors, drug substances, and pharmacological tool compounds. Determination of sublibraries' activities was done by quantification of bound NO711 as reporter ligand and hit identification for the active ones achieved in a further LC-ESI-MS/MS run in the multiple reaction monitoring mode enabling detection of all sublibrary components followed by hit verification and investigation of reduced sublibraries in further competitive binding experiments. In this way, we could demonstrate that all GAT1 inhibitors reducing reporter ligand binding below 50% at a concentration of 1 μM are detected reliably without generation of false positive or false negative hits. As the described strategy is apart from its reliability also highly efficient, it can be assumed to become a valuable tool in early drug research, especially for membrane integrated drug targets that are often posing problems in established screening techniques. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6787468/ /pubmed/31637233 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00665 Text en Copyright © 2019 Gabriel, Höfner and Wanner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Chemistry
Gabriel, Jürgen
Höfner, Georg
Wanner, Klaus T.
A Library Screening Strategy Combining the Concepts of MS Binding Assays and Affinity Selection Mass Spectrometry
title A Library Screening Strategy Combining the Concepts of MS Binding Assays and Affinity Selection Mass Spectrometry
title_full A Library Screening Strategy Combining the Concepts of MS Binding Assays and Affinity Selection Mass Spectrometry
title_fullStr A Library Screening Strategy Combining the Concepts of MS Binding Assays and Affinity Selection Mass Spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed A Library Screening Strategy Combining the Concepts of MS Binding Assays and Affinity Selection Mass Spectrometry
title_short A Library Screening Strategy Combining the Concepts of MS Binding Assays and Affinity Selection Mass Spectrometry
title_sort library screening strategy combining the concepts of ms binding assays and affinity selection mass spectrometry
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637233
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00665
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrieljurgen alibraryscreeningstrategycombiningtheconceptsofmsbindingassaysandaffinityselectionmassspectrometry
AT hofnergeorg alibraryscreeningstrategycombiningtheconceptsofmsbindingassaysandaffinityselectionmassspectrometry
AT wannerklaust alibraryscreeningstrategycombiningtheconceptsofmsbindingassaysandaffinityselectionmassspectrometry
AT gabrieljurgen libraryscreeningstrategycombiningtheconceptsofmsbindingassaysandaffinityselectionmassspectrometry
AT hofnergeorg libraryscreeningstrategycombiningtheconceptsofmsbindingassaysandaffinityselectionmassspectrometry
AT wannerklaust libraryscreeningstrategycombiningtheconceptsofmsbindingassaysandaffinityselectionmassspectrometry