Cargando…
Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting?
Full completion of cognitive screening tests can be problematic in the context of a stroke. Our aim was to examine the completion of various brief cognitive screens and explore reasons for untestability. Data were collected from consecutive stroke admissions (May 2016–August 2018). The cognitive ass...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31416176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9030095 |
_version_ | 1783458299115470848 |
---|---|
author | Elliott, Emma Drozdowska, Bogna A. Taylor-Rowan, Martin Shaw, Robert C. Cuthbertson, Gillian Quinn, Terence J. |
author_facet | Elliott, Emma Drozdowska, Bogna A. Taylor-Rowan, Martin Shaw, Robert C. Cuthbertson, Gillian Quinn, Terence J. |
author_sort | Elliott, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Full completion of cognitive screening tests can be problematic in the context of a stroke. Our aim was to examine the completion of various brief cognitive screens and explore reasons for untestability. Data were collected from consecutive stroke admissions (May 2016–August 2018). The cognitive assessment was attempted during the first week of admission. Patients were classified as partially untestable (≥1 test item was incomplete) and fully untestable (where assessment was not attempted, and/or no questions answered). We assessed univariate and multivariate associations of test completion with: age (years), sex, stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)), stroke classification, pre-morbid disability (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)), previous stroke and previous dementia diagnosis. Of 703 patients admitted (mean age: 69.4), 119 (17%) were classified as fully untestable and 58 (8%) were partially untestable. The 4A-test had 100% completion and the clock-draw task had the lowest completion (533/703, 76%). Independent associations with fully untestable status had a higher NIHSS score (odds ratio (OR): 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11–1.26), higher pre-morbid mRS (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.02–1.60) and pre-stroke dementia (OR: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.53–7.32). Overall, a quarter of patients were classified as untestable on the cognitive assessment, with test incompletion related to stroke and non-stroke factors. Clinicians and researchers would benefit from guidance on how to make the best use of incomplete test data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6787589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67875892019-10-16 Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting? Elliott, Emma Drozdowska, Bogna A. Taylor-Rowan, Martin Shaw, Robert C. Cuthbertson, Gillian Quinn, Terence J. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Full completion of cognitive screening tests can be problematic in the context of a stroke. Our aim was to examine the completion of various brief cognitive screens and explore reasons for untestability. Data were collected from consecutive stroke admissions (May 2016–August 2018). The cognitive assessment was attempted during the first week of admission. Patients were classified as partially untestable (≥1 test item was incomplete) and fully untestable (where assessment was not attempted, and/or no questions answered). We assessed univariate and multivariate associations of test completion with: age (years), sex, stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)), stroke classification, pre-morbid disability (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)), previous stroke and previous dementia diagnosis. Of 703 patients admitted (mean age: 69.4), 119 (17%) were classified as fully untestable and 58 (8%) were partially untestable. The 4A-test had 100% completion and the clock-draw task had the lowest completion (533/703, 76%). Independent associations with fully untestable status had a higher NIHSS score (odds ratio (OR): 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11–1.26), higher pre-morbid mRS (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.02–1.60) and pre-stroke dementia (OR: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.53–7.32). Overall, a quarter of patients were classified as untestable on the cognitive assessment, with test incompletion related to stroke and non-stroke factors. Clinicians and researchers would benefit from guidance on how to make the best use of incomplete test data. MDPI 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6787589/ /pubmed/31416176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9030095 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Elliott, Emma Drozdowska, Bogna A. Taylor-Rowan, Martin Shaw, Robert C. Cuthbertson, Gillian Quinn, Terence J. Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting? |
title | Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting? |
title_full | Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting? |
title_fullStr | Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting? |
title_full_unstemmed | Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting? |
title_short | Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting? |
title_sort | who is classified as untestable on brief cognitive screens in an acute stroke setting? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31416176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9030095 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elliottemma whoisclassifiedasuntestableonbriefcognitivescreensinanacutestrokesetting AT drozdowskabognaa whoisclassifiedasuntestableonbriefcognitivescreensinanacutestrokesetting AT taylorrowanmartin whoisclassifiedasuntestableonbriefcognitivescreensinanacutestrokesetting AT shawrobertc whoisclassifiedasuntestableonbriefcognitivescreensinanacutestrokesetting AT cuthbertsongillian whoisclassifiedasuntestableonbriefcognitivescreensinanacutestrokesetting AT quinnterencej whoisclassifiedasuntestableonbriefcognitivescreensinanacutestrokesetting |