Cargando…

Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting?

Full completion of cognitive screening tests can be problematic in the context of a stroke. Our aim was to examine the completion of various brief cognitive screens and explore reasons for untestability. Data were collected from consecutive stroke admissions (May 2016–August 2018). The cognitive ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elliott, Emma, Drozdowska, Bogna A., Taylor-Rowan, Martin, Shaw, Robert C., Cuthbertson, Gillian, Quinn, Terence J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31416176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9030095
_version_ 1783458299115470848
author Elliott, Emma
Drozdowska, Bogna A.
Taylor-Rowan, Martin
Shaw, Robert C.
Cuthbertson, Gillian
Quinn, Terence J.
author_facet Elliott, Emma
Drozdowska, Bogna A.
Taylor-Rowan, Martin
Shaw, Robert C.
Cuthbertson, Gillian
Quinn, Terence J.
author_sort Elliott, Emma
collection PubMed
description Full completion of cognitive screening tests can be problematic in the context of a stroke. Our aim was to examine the completion of various brief cognitive screens and explore reasons for untestability. Data were collected from consecutive stroke admissions (May 2016–August 2018). The cognitive assessment was attempted during the first week of admission. Patients were classified as partially untestable (≥1 test item was incomplete) and fully untestable (where assessment was not attempted, and/or no questions answered). We assessed univariate and multivariate associations of test completion with: age (years), sex, stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)), stroke classification, pre-morbid disability (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)), previous stroke and previous dementia diagnosis. Of 703 patients admitted (mean age: 69.4), 119 (17%) were classified as fully untestable and 58 (8%) were partially untestable. The 4A-test had 100% completion and the clock-draw task had the lowest completion (533/703, 76%). Independent associations with fully untestable status had a higher NIHSS score (odds ratio (OR): 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11–1.26), higher pre-morbid mRS (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.02–1.60) and pre-stroke dementia (OR: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.53–7.32). Overall, a quarter of patients were classified as untestable on the cognitive assessment, with test incompletion related to stroke and non-stroke factors. Clinicians and researchers would benefit from guidance on how to make the best use of incomplete test data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6787589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67875892019-10-16 Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting? Elliott, Emma Drozdowska, Bogna A. Taylor-Rowan, Martin Shaw, Robert C. Cuthbertson, Gillian Quinn, Terence J. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Full completion of cognitive screening tests can be problematic in the context of a stroke. Our aim was to examine the completion of various brief cognitive screens and explore reasons for untestability. Data were collected from consecutive stroke admissions (May 2016–August 2018). The cognitive assessment was attempted during the first week of admission. Patients were classified as partially untestable (≥1 test item was incomplete) and fully untestable (where assessment was not attempted, and/or no questions answered). We assessed univariate and multivariate associations of test completion with: age (years), sex, stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)), stroke classification, pre-morbid disability (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)), previous stroke and previous dementia diagnosis. Of 703 patients admitted (mean age: 69.4), 119 (17%) were classified as fully untestable and 58 (8%) were partially untestable. The 4A-test had 100% completion and the clock-draw task had the lowest completion (533/703, 76%). Independent associations with fully untestable status had a higher NIHSS score (odds ratio (OR): 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11–1.26), higher pre-morbid mRS (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.02–1.60) and pre-stroke dementia (OR: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.53–7.32). Overall, a quarter of patients were classified as untestable on the cognitive assessment, with test incompletion related to stroke and non-stroke factors. Clinicians and researchers would benefit from guidance on how to make the best use of incomplete test data. MDPI 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6787589/ /pubmed/31416176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9030095 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Elliott, Emma
Drozdowska, Bogna A.
Taylor-Rowan, Martin
Shaw, Robert C.
Cuthbertson, Gillian
Quinn, Terence J.
Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting?
title Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting?
title_full Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting?
title_fullStr Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting?
title_full_unstemmed Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting?
title_short Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting?
title_sort who is classified as untestable on brief cognitive screens in an acute stroke setting?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31416176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9030095
work_keys_str_mv AT elliottemma whoisclassifiedasuntestableonbriefcognitivescreensinanacutestrokesetting
AT drozdowskabognaa whoisclassifiedasuntestableonbriefcognitivescreensinanacutestrokesetting
AT taylorrowanmartin whoisclassifiedasuntestableonbriefcognitivescreensinanacutestrokesetting
AT shawrobertc whoisclassifiedasuntestableonbriefcognitivescreensinanacutestrokesetting
AT cuthbertsongillian whoisclassifiedasuntestableonbriefcognitivescreensinanacutestrokesetting
AT quinnterencej whoisclassifiedasuntestableonbriefcognitivescreensinanacutestrokesetting