Cargando…

Hospital Laboratory Survey for Identification of Candida auris in Belgium

Candida auris is a difficult-to-identify, emerging yeast and a cause of sustained nosocomial outbreaks. Presently, not much data exist on laboratory preparedness in Europe. To assess the ability of laboratories in Belgium and Luxembourg to detect this species, a blinded C. auris strain was included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dewaele, Klaas, Lagrou, Katrien, Frans, Johan, Hayette, Marie-Pierre, Vernelen, Kris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31491950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof5030084
_version_ 1783458303679922176
author Dewaele, Klaas
Lagrou, Katrien
Frans, Johan
Hayette, Marie-Pierre
Vernelen, Kris
author_facet Dewaele, Klaas
Lagrou, Katrien
Frans, Johan
Hayette, Marie-Pierre
Vernelen, Kris
author_sort Dewaele, Klaas
collection PubMed
description Candida auris is a difficult-to-identify, emerging yeast and a cause of sustained nosocomial outbreaks. Presently, not much data exist on laboratory preparedness in Europe. To assess the ability of laboratories in Belgium and Luxembourg to detect this species, a blinded C. auris strain was included in the regular proficiency testing rounds organized by the Belgian public health institute, Sciensano. Laboratories were asked to identify and report the isolate as they would in routine clinical practice, as if grown from a blood culture. Of 142 respondents, 82 (57.7%) obtained a correct identification of C. auris. Of 142 respondents, 27 (19.0%) identified the strain as Candida haemulonii. The remaining labs that did not obtain a correct identification (33/142, 23.2%), reported other yeast species (4/33) or failed to obtain a species identification (29/33). To assess awareness about the infection-control implications of the identification, participants were requested to indicate whether referral of this isolate to a reference laboratory was desirable in a clinical context. Over one-third of all respondents (54/142, 38.0%) stated that they would not send the isolate to a reference laboratory, neither for epidemiological reasons nor for identification confirmation or antifungal susceptibility testing. This comprised 41.5% of the laboratories that submitted an identification of C. auris (34/82). Awareness among Belgian microbiologists, therefore, remains inadequate more than two years after C. auris’ emergence in European clinics. Our data confirm high rates of misidentifications with commonly used identification methods. Programs for raising awareness in European hospitals may be warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6787608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67876082019-10-16 Hospital Laboratory Survey for Identification of Candida auris in Belgium Dewaele, Klaas Lagrou, Katrien Frans, Johan Hayette, Marie-Pierre Vernelen, Kris J Fungi (Basel) Article Candida auris is a difficult-to-identify, emerging yeast and a cause of sustained nosocomial outbreaks. Presently, not much data exist on laboratory preparedness in Europe. To assess the ability of laboratories in Belgium and Luxembourg to detect this species, a blinded C. auris strain was included in the regular proficiency testing rounds organized by the Belgian public health institute, Sciensano. Laboratories were asked to identify and report the isolate as they would in routine clinical practice, as if grown from a blood culture. Of 142 respondents, 82 (57.7%) obtained a correct identification of C. auris. Of 142 respondents, 27 (19.0%) identified the strain as Candida haemulonii. The remaining labs that did not obtain a correct identification (33/142, 23.2%), reported other yeast species (4/33) or failed to obtain a species identification (29/33). To assess awareness about the infection-control implications of the identification, participants were requested to indicate whether referral of this isolate to a reference laboratory was desirable in a clinical context. Over one-third of all respondents (54/142, 38.0%) stated that they would not send the isolate to a reference laboratory, neither for epidemiological reasons nor for identification confirmation or antifungal susceptibility testing. This comprised 41.5% of the laboratories that submitted an identification of C. auris (34/82). Awareness among Belgian microbiologists, therefore, remains inadequate more than two years after C. auris’ emergence in European clinics. Our data confirm high rates of misidentifications with commonly used identification methods. Programs for raising awareness in European hospitals may be warranted. MDPI 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6787608/ /pubmed/31491950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof5030084 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dewaele, Klaas
Lagrou, Katrien
Frans, Johan
Hayette, Marie-Pierre
Vernelen, Kris
Hospital Laboratory Survey for Identification of Candida auris in Belgium
title Hospital Laboratory Survey for Identification of Candida auris in Belgium
title_full Hospital Laboratory Survey for Identification of Candida auris in Belgium
title_fullStr Hospital Laboratory Survey for Identification of Candida auris in Belgium
title_full_unstemmed Hospital Laboratory Survey for Identification of Candida auris in Belgium
title_short Hospital Laboratory Survey for Identification of Candida auris in Belgium
title_sort hospital laboratory survey for identification of candida auris in belgium
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31491950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof5030084
work_keys_str_mv AT dewaeleklaas hospitallaboratorysurveyforidentificationofcandidaaurisinbelgium
AT lagroukatrien hospitallaboratorysurveyforidentificationofcandidaaurisinbelgium
AT fransjohan hospitallaboratorysurveyforidentificationofcandidaaurisinbelgium
AT hayettemariepierre hospitallaboratorysurveyforidentificationofcandidaaurisinbelgium
AT vernelenkris hospitallaboratorysurveyforidentificationofcandidaaurisinbelgium