Cargando…

Proposed Lyme Disease Guidelines and Psychiatric Illnesses

The Infectious Disease Society of America, American Academy of Neurology, and American Academy of Rheumatology jointly proposed Lyme disease guidelines. Four areas most relevant to psychiatry were reviewed—the disclaimer, laboratory testing, and adult and pediatric psychiatric sections. The disclaim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bransfield, Robert C., Cook, Michael J., Bransfield, Douglas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31505800
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7030105
_version_ 1783458346058121216
author Bransfield, Robert C.
Cook, Michael J.
Bransfield, Douglas R.
author_facet Bransfield, Robert C.
Cook, Michael J.
Bransfield, Douglas R.
author_sort Bransfield, Robert C.
collection PubMed
description The Infectious Disease Society of America, American Academy of Neurology, and American Academy of Rheumatology jointly proposed Lyme disease guidelines. Four areas most relevant to psychiatry were reviewed—the disclaimer, laboratory testing, and adult and pediatric psychiatric sections. The disclaimer and the manner in which these guidelines are implemented are insufficient to remove the authors and sponsoring organizations from liability for harm caused by these guidelines. The guidelines and supporting citations place improper credibility upon surveillance case definition rather than clinical diagnosis criteria. The guidelines fail to address the clear causal association between Lyme disease and psychiatric illnesses, suicide, violence, developmental disabilities and substance abuse despite significant supporting evidence. If these guidelines are published without very major revisions, and if the sponsoring medical societies attempt to enforce these guidelines as a standard of care, it will directly contribute to increasing a national and global epidemic of psychiatric illnesses, suicide, violence, substance abuse and developmental disabilities and the associated economic and non-economic societal burdens. The guideline flaws could be improved with a more appropriate disclaimer, an evidence-based rather than an evidence-biased approach, more accurate diagnostic criteria, and recognition of the direct and serious causal association between Lyme disease and psychiatric illnesses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6787753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67877532019-10-16 Proposed Lyme Disease Guidelines and Psychiatric Illnesses Bransfield, Robert C. Cook, Michael J. Bransfield, Douglas R. Healthcare (Basel) Review The Infectious Disease Society of America, American Academy of Neurology, and American Academy of Rheumatology jointly proposed Lyme disease guidelines. Four areas most relevant to psychiatry were reviewed—the disclaimer, laboratory testing, and adult and pediatric psychiatric sections. The disclaimer and the manner in which these guidelines are implemented are insufficient to remove the authors and sponsoring organizations from liability for harm caused by these guidelines. The guidelines and supporting citations place improper credibility upon surveillance case definition rather than clinical diagnosis criteria. The guidelines fail to address the clear causal association between Lyme disease and psychiatric illnesses, suicide, violence, developmental disabilities and substance abuse despite significant supporting evidence. If these guidelines are published without very major revisions, and if the sponsoring medical societies attempt to enforce these guidelines as a standard of care, it will directly contribute to increasing a national and global epidemic of psychiatric illnesses, suicide, violence, substance abuse and developmental disabilities and the associated economic and non-economic societal burdens. The guideline flaws could be improved with a more appropriate disclaimer, an evidence-based rather than an evidence-biased approach, more accurate diagnostic criteria, and recognition of the direct and serious causal association between Lyme disease and psychiatric illnesses. MDPI 2019-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6787753/ /pubmed/31505800 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7030105 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bransfield, Robert C.
Cook, Michael J.
Bransfield, Douglas R.
Proposed Lyme Disease Guidelines and Psychiatric Illnesses
title Proposed Lyme Disease Guidelines and Psychiatric Illnesses
title_full Proposed Lyme Disease Guidelines and Psychiatric Illnesses
title_fullStr Proposed Lyme Disease Guidelines and Psychiatric Illnesses
title_full_unstemmed Proposed Lyme Disease Guidelines and Psychiatric Illnesses
title_short Proposed Lyme Disease Guidelines and Psychiatric Illnesses
title_sort proposed lyme disease guidelines and psychiatric illnesses
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31505800
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7030105
work_keys_str_mv AT bransfieldrobertc proposedlymediseaseguidelinesandpsychiatricillnesses
AT cookmichaelj proposedlymediseaseguidelinesandpsychiatricillnesses
AT bransfielddouglasr proposedlymediseaseguidelinesandpsychiatricillnesses