Cargando…

Improving Equity of Access Through Electronic Consultation: A Case Study of an eConsult Service

Background: Patients with complex circumstances pertaining to geography, socioeconomic status, or functional health often face inequities in accessing care. Electronic consultation (eConsult) is a secure online application that allows primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists to communicate rega...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liddy, Clare, Joschko, Justin, Guglani, Sheena, Afkham, Amir, Keely, Erin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00279
_version_ 1783458348036784128
author Liddy, Clare
Joschko, Justin
Guglani, Sheena
Afkham, Amir
Keely, Erin
author_facet Liddy, Clare
Joschko, Justin
Guglani, Sheena
Afkham, Amir
Keely, Erin
author_sort Liddy, Clare
collection PubMed
description Background: Patients with complex circumstances pertaining to geography, socioeconomic status, or functional health often face inequities in accessing care. Electronic consultation (eConsult) is a secure online application that allows primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists to communicate regarding a patient's care. eConsult has demonstrated an ability to improve access to specialist care, and may be of particular use in cases of inequitable access. Methods: We examined how eConsult is used to improve equity of access for patients in complex circumstances by conducting a multiple case study of eConsults from seven patient groups: addiction, frail elderly, homeless, long-term care, rural, special needs, and transgender. Cases from these groups were selected from all eConsult cases completed between January 1 and December 31, 2017 using a data collection strategy tailored to each group. An access framework by Levesque et al. was applied to the data to examine five dimensions of access, arranged in chronological order, that reflect the process of a patient seeking care: approachability, acceptability; availability, affordability, and appropriateness. Two reviewers analyzed the cases using an iterative approach, regularly presenting findings to the research team for discussion and interpretation. Results: Eight hundred and twenty-five cases emerged across the seven target groups. The selected cases highlighted a number of key factors, including the value of the patient-PCP relationship, the importance of considering patient perspectives when providing care, and efforts to accommodate patients facing particular challenges to accessing care. Examples emerged among all five dimensions of the Levesque et al. access framework, with the final dimension, appropriateness, emerging across all cases. Conclusions: By leveraging the eConsult platform, PCPs can help improve equitable access to specialist care. More research is needed to understand why patients with complex circumstances face a longer wait time compared to the general population, and the impact that eConsults can have in improving health outcomes and wait times for this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6787760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67877602019-10-21 Improving Equity of Access Through Electronic Consultation: A Case Study of an eConsult Service Liddy, Clare Joschko, Justin Guglani, Sheena Afkham, Amir Keely, Erin Front Public Health Public Health Background: Patients with complex circumstances pertaining to geography, socioeconomic status, or functional health often face inequities in accessing care. Electronic consultation (eConsult) is a secure online application that allows primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists to communicate regarding a patient's care. eConsult has demonstrated an ability to improve access to specialist care, and may be of particular use in cases of inequitable access. Methods: We examined how eConsult is used to improve equity of access for patients in complex circumstances by conducting a multiple case study of eConsults from seven patient groups: addiction, frail elderly, homeless, long-term care, rural, special needs, and transgender. Cases from these groups were selected from all eConsult cases completed between January 1 and December 31, 2017 using a data collection strategy tailored to each group. An access framework by Levesque et al. was applied to the data to examine five dimensions of access, arranged in chronological order, that reflect the process of a patient seeking care: approachability, acceptability; availability, affordability, and appropriateness. Two reviewers analyzed the cases using an iterative approach, regularly presenting findings to the research team for discussion and interpretation. Results: Eight hundred and twenty-five cases emerged across the seven target groups. The selected cases highlighted a number of key factors, including the value of the patient-PCP relationship, the importance of considering patient perspectives when providing care, and efforts to accommodate patients facing particular challenges to accessing care. Examples emerged among all five dimensions of the Levesque et al. access framework, with the final dimension, appropriateness, emerging across all cases. Conclusions: By leveraging the eConsult platform, PCPs can help improve equitable access to specialist care. More research is needed to understand why patients with complex circumstances face a longer wait time compared to the general population, and the impact that eConsults can have in improving health outcomes and wait times for this population. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6787760/ /pubmed/31637228 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00279 Text en Copyright © 2019 Liddy, Joschko, Guglani, Afkham and Keely. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Liddy, Clare
Joschko, Justin
Guglani, Sheena
Afkham, Amir
Keely, Erin
Improving Equity of Access Through Electronic Consultation: A Case Study of an eConsult Service
title Improving Equity of Access Through Electronic Consultation: A Case Study of an eConsult Service
title_full Improving Equity of Access Through Electronic Consultation: A Case Study of an eConsult Service
title_fullStr Improving Equity of Access Through Electronic Consultation: A Case Study of an eConsult Service
title_full_unstemmed Improving Equity of Access Through Electronic Consultation: A Case Study of an eConsult Service
title_short Improving Equity of Access Through Electronic Consultation: A Case Study of an eConsult Service
title_sort improving equity of access through electronic consultation: a case study of an econsult service
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00279
work_keys_str_mv AT liddyclare improvingequityofaccessthroughelectronicconsultationacasestudyofaneconsultservice
AT joschkojustin improvingequityofaccessthroughelectronicconsultationacasestudyofaneconsultservice
AT guglanisheena improvingequityofaccessthroughelectronicconsultationacasestudyofaneconsultservice
AT afkhamamir improvingequityofaccessthroughelectronicconsultationacasestudyofaneconsultservice
AT keelyerin improvingequityofaccessthroughelectronicconsultationacasestudyofaneconsultservice