Cargando…

Detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models

1. Understanding the prevalence of pathogens in invasive species is essential to guide efforts to prevent transmission to agricultural animals, wildlife, and humans. Pathogen prevalence can be difficult to estimate for wild species due to imperfect sampling and testing (pathogens may not be detected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabak, Michael A., Pedersen, Kerri, Miller, Ryan S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5558
_version_ 1783458374550028288
author Tabak, Michael A.
Pedersen, Kerri
Miller, Ryan S.
author_facet Tabak, Michael A.
Pedersen, Kerri
Miller, Ryan S.
author_sort Tabak, Michael A.
collection PubMed
description 1. Understanding the prevalence of pathogens in invasive species is essential to guide efforts to prevent transmission to agricultural animals, wildlife, and humans. Pathogen prevalence can be difficult to estimate for wild species due to imperfect sampling and testing (pathogens may not be detected in infected individuals and erroneously detected in individuals that are not infected). The invasive wild pig (Sus scrofa, also referred to as wild boar and feral swine) is one of the most widespread hosts of domestic animal and human pathogens in North America. 2. We developed hierarchical Bayesian models that account for imperfect detection to estimate the seroprevalence of five pathogens (porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, pseudorabies virus, Influenza A virus in swine, Hepatitis E virus, and Brucella spp.) in wild pigs in the United States using a dataset of over 50,000 samples across nine years. To assess the effect of incorporating detection error in models, we also evaluated models that ignored detection error. Both sets of models included effects of demographic parameters on seroprevalence. We compared our predictions of seroprevalence to 40 published studies, only one of which accounted for imperfect detection. 3. We found a range of seroprevalence among the pathogens with a high seroprevalence of pseudorabies virus, indicating significant risk to livestock and wildlife. Demographics had mostly weak effects, indicating that other variables may have greater effects in predicting seroprevalence. 4. Models that ignored detection error led to different predictions of seroprevalence as well as different inferences on the effects of demographic parameters. 5. Our results highlight the importance of incorporating detection error in models of seroprevalence and demonstrate that ignoring such error may lead to erroneous conclusions about the risk associated with pathogen transmission. When using opportunistic sampling data to model seroprevalence and evaluate risk factors, detection error should be included.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6787870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67878702019-10-18 Detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models Tabak, Michael A. Pedersen, Kerri Miller, Ryan S. Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Understanding the prevalence of pathogens in invasive species is essential to guide efforts to prevent transmission to agricultural animals, wildlife, and humans. Pathogen prevalence can be difficult to estimate for wild species due to imperfect sampling and testing (pathogens may not be detected in infected individuals and erroneously detected in individuals that are not infected). The invasive wild pig (Sus scrofa, also referred to as wild boar and feral swine) is one of the most widespread hosts of domestic animal and human pathogens in North America. 2. We developed hierarchical Bayesian models that account for imperfect detection to estimate the seroprevalence of five pathogens (porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, pseudorabies virus, Influenza A virus in swine, Hepatitis E virus, and Brucella spp.) in wild pigs in the United States using a dataset of over 50,000 samples across nine years. To assess the effect of incorporating detection error in models, we also evaluated models that ignored detection error. Both sets of models included effects of demographic parameters on seroprevalence. We compared our predictions of seroprevalence to 40 published studies, only one of which accounted for imperfect detection. 3. We found a range of seroprevalence among the pathogens with a high seroprevalence of pseudorabies virus, indicating significant risk to livestock and wildlife. Demographics had mostly weak effects, indicating that other variables may have greater effects in predicting seroprevalence. 4. Models that ignored detection error led to different predictions of seroprevalence as well as different inferences on the effects of demographic parameters. 5. Our results highlight the importance of incorporating detection error in models of seroprevalence and demonstrate that ignoring such error may lead to erroneous conclusions about the risk associated with pathogen transmission. When using opportunistic sampling data to model seroprevalence and evaluate risk factors, detection error should be included. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6787870/ /pubmed/31632645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5558 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tabak, Michael A.
Pedersen, Kerri
Miller, Ryan S.
Detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models
title Detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models
title_full Detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models
title_fullStr Detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models
title_full_unstemmed Detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models
title_short Detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models
title_sort detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5558
work_keys_str_mv AT tabakmichaela detectionerrorinfluencesbothtemporalseroprevalencepredictionsandriskfactorsassociationsinwildlifediseasemodels
AT pedersenkerri detectionerrorinfluencesbothtemporalseroprevalencepredictionsandriskfactorsassociationsinwildlifediseasemodels
AT millerryans detectionerrorinfluencesbothtemporalseroprevalencepredictionsandriskfactorsassociationsinwildlifediseasemodels