Cargando…
Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating
Contract cheating refers to students paying a third party to complete university assessments for them. Although opportunities for commercial contract cheating are widely available in the form of essay mills, only about 3% of students engage in this behaviour. This study examined the reasons why most...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636584 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02229 |
_version_ | 1783458384437051392 |
---|---|
author | Rundle, Kiata Curtis, Guy J. Clare, Joseph |
author_facet | Rundle, Kiata Curtis, Guy J. Clare, Joseph |
author_sort | Rundle, Kiata |
collection | PubMed |
description | Contract cheating refers to students paying a third party to complete university assessments for them. Although opportunities for commercial contract cheating are widely available in the form of essay mills, only about 3% of students engage in this behaviour. This study examined the reasons why most students do not engage in contract cheating. Students (n = 1204) completed a survey on why they do not engage in contract cheating as well as measures of several individual differences, including self-control, grit and the Dark Triad traits. Morality and motivation for learning received the greatest endorsement for why students do not engage in contract cheating. Controlling for gender, individual differences predicted students’ reasons for not contract cheating. This study supports the use of criminological theories relating to rational choice, self-control and opportunity to explain why students do not engage in contract cheating. Practically, this study may inform academic policies and assessment design that may reduce contract cheating. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6787909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67879092019-10-21 Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating Rundle, Kiata Curtis, Guy J. Clare, Joseph Front Psychol Psychology Contract cheating refers to students paying a third party to complete university assessments for them. Although opportunities for commercial contract cheating are widely available in the form of essay mills, only about 3% of students engage in this behaviour. This study examined the reasons why most students do not engage in contract cheating. Students (n = 1204) completed a survey on why they do not engage in contract cheating as well as measures of several individual differences, including self-control, grit and the Dark Triad traits. Morality and motivation for learning received the greatest endorsement for why students do not engage in contract cheating. Controlling for gender, individual differences predicted students’ reasons for not contract cheating. This study supports the use of criminological theories relating to rational choice, self-control and opportunity to explain why students do not engage in contract cheating. Practically, this study may inform academic policies and assessment design that may reduce contract cheating. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6787909/ /pubmed/31636584 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02229 Text en Copyright © 2019 Rundle, Curtis and Clare. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Rundle, Kiata Curtis, Guy J. Clare, Joseph Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating |
title | Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating |
title_full | Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating |
title_fullStr | Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating |
title_full_unstemmed | Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating |
title_short | Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating |
title_sort | why students do not engage in contract cheating |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636584 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rundlekiata whystudentsdonotengageincontractcheating AT curtisguyj whystudentsdonotengageincontractcheating AT clarejoseph whystudentsdonotengageincontractcheating |