Cargando…

Harmonisation of Outcome Parameters and Evaluation (HOPE) for actinic keratosis: protocol for the development of a core outcome set

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AK) are common skin lesions that can progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. A variety of lesion- or field-targeted treatment options exist and their efficacy has been demonstrated in numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, the reported...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heppt, Markus V., Steeb, Theresa, Schmitz, Lutz, Garbe, Claus, French, Lars E., Leiter, Ulrike, Berking, Carola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31604473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3696-6
_version_ 1783458394331414528
author Heppt, Markus V.
Steeb, Theresa
Schmitz, Lutz
Garbe, Claus
French, Lars E.
Leiter, Ulrike
Berking, Carola
author_facet Heppt, Markus V.
Steeb, Theresa
Schmitz, Lutz
Garbe, Claus
French, Lars E.
Leiter, Ulrike
Berking, Carola
author_sort Heppt, Markus V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AK) are common skin lesions that can progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. A variety of lesion- or field-targeted treatment options exist and their efficacy has been demonstrated in numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, the reported endpoints are highly heterogeneous, making it difficult to assess and compare distinct treatment options and to reach an evidence-based choice of therapy. METHODS: A systematic literature search will be conducted to analyse which endpoints are reported in RCTs. The focus will be on effectiveness, tolerability, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction. The reported endpoints of these studies, as well as their frequency and data collection times, will be documented in a standardised way to generate a comprehensive list of reported endpoints. In order to complete the identified outcomes in the literature search, focus groups on affected patients and structured interviews with board-certified dermatologists will be conducted to identify both patient- and practice-relevant endpoints. After the identification phase, the evaluation of the endpoints follows. In a two-stage Delphi procedure, experts including patient representatives will evaluate the endpoints in a standardised and transparent manner. A final face-to-face consensus meeting will be conducted after the last Delphi round in which a final list of core outcomes will be consented. DISCUSSION: The development of a standardised endpoint set for the treatment of AK will contribute to improving the comparability of therapeutic options. Our catalogue will enhance the synthesis of evidence for the future by reducing heterogeneity in outcomes between RCTs and hence contribute to improving the quality of research, evidence-based and patient-centred treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness (COMET) database. Registered in December 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6787971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67879712019-10-18 Harmonisation of Outcome Parameters and Evaluation (HOPE) for actinic keratosis: protocol for the development of a core outcome set Heppt, Markus V. Steeb, Theresa Schmitz, Lutz Garbe, Claus French, Lars E. Leiter, Ulrike Berking, Carola Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AK) are common skin lesions that can progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. A variety of lesion- or field-targeted treatment options exist and their efficacy has been demonstrated in numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, the reported endpoints are highly heterogeneous, making it difficult to assess and compare distinct treatment options and to reach an evidence-based choice of therapy. METHODS: A systematic literature search will be conducted to analyse which endpoints are reported in RCTs. The focus will be on effectiveness, tolerability, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction. The reported endpoints of these studies, as well as their frequency and data collection times, will be documented in a standardised way to generate a comprehensive list of reported endpoints. In order to complete the identified outcomes in the literature search, focus groups on affected patients and structured interviews with board-certified dermatologists will be conducted to identify both patient- and practice-relevant endpoints. After the identification phase, the evaluation of the endpoints follows. In a two-stage Delphi procedure, experts including patient representatives will evaluate the endpoints in a standardised and transparent manner. A final face-to-face consensus meeting will be conducted after the last Delphi round in which a final list of core outcomes will be consented. DISCUSSION: The development of a standardised endpoint set for the treatment of AK will contribute to improving the comparability of therapeutic options. Our catalogue will enhance the synthesis of evidence for the future by reducing heterogeneity in outcomes between RCTs and hence contribute to improving the quality of research, evidence-based and patient-centred treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness (COMET) database. Registered in December 2018. BioMed Central 2019-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6787971/ /pubmed/31604473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3696-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Heppt, Markus V.
Steeb, Theresa
Schmitz, Lutz
Garbe, Claus
French, Lars E.
Leiter, Ulrike
Berking, Carola
Harmonisation of Outcome Parameters and Evaluation (HOPE) for actinic keratosis: protocol for the development of a core outcome set
title Harmonisation of Outcome Parameters and Evaluation (HOPE) for actinic keratosis: protocol for the development of a core outcome set
title_full Harmonisation of Outcome Parameters and Evaluation (HOPE) for actinic keratosis: protocol for the development of a core outcome set
title_fullStr Harmonisation of Outcome Parameters and Evaluation (HOPE) for actinic keratosis: protocol for the development of a core outcome set
title_full_unstemmed Harmonisation of Outcome Parameters and Evaluation (HOPE) for actinic keratosis: protocol for the development of a core outcome set
title_short Harmonisation of Outcome Parameters and Evaluation (HOPE) for actinic keratosis: protocol for the development of a core outcome set
title_sort harmonisation of outcome parameters and evaluation (hope) for actinic keratosis: protocol for the development of a core outcome set
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31604473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3696-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hepptmarkusv harmonisationofoutcomeparametersandevaluationhopeforactinickeratosisprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT steebtheresa harmonisationofoutcomeparametersandevaluationhopeforactinickeratosisprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT schmitzlutz harmonisationofoutcomeparametersandevaluationhopeforactinickeratosisprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT garbeclaus harmonisationofoutcomeparametersandevaluationhopeforactinickeratosisprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT frenchlarse harmonisationofoutcomeparametersandevaluationhopeforactinickeratosisprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT leiterulrike harmonisationofoutcomeparametersandevaluationhopeforactinickeratosisprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT berkingcarola harmonisationofoutcomeparametersandevaluationhopeforactinickeratosisprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset