Cargando…

Are cerebral veins hounsfield unit and H: H ratio calculating in unenhanced CT eligible to diagnosis of acute cerebral vein thrombosis?

BACKGROUND: For both the clinician and a radiologist, the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), because of the variety of signs and symptoms, remains a challenge. In this study, the role of unenhanced brain computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of CVST was assessed. MATERIALS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shayganfar, Azin, Azad, Roya, Taki, Maryam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6788179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620182
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_1027_18
_version_ 1783458434326200320
author Shayganfar, Azin
Azad, Roya
Taki, Maryam
author_facet Shayganfar, Azin
Azad, Roya
Taki, Maryam
author_sort Shayganfar, Azin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For both the clinician and a radiologist, the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), because of the variety of signs and symptoms, remains a challenge. In this study, the role of unenhanced brain computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of CVST was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case–control study, unenhanced CT of 35 patients with acute CVST was compared with 70 normal patients. Hematocrit (HCT), creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen were recorded in all patients. CT images were read, and the attenuation was measured by two independent experienced radiologists. The H:H ratio was calculated for all patients in both case and control groups to normalized densities regarding HCT. RESULTS: The mean of attenuation in patients was 66.95 ± 10.63 Hounsfield unit (HU) and in the controls was 52.51 ± 2.92 HU (P < 0.0001). The mean of H:H ratio in patients was 1.78 ± 0.40 and in controls was 1.46 ± 0.28 (P < 0.0001). Attenuation >60.4 HU was the best optimal cutoff with area under the curve of 0.918 (0.848–0.962) and had 71.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity. H:H ratio >1.42 as the optimal cutoff had 94.3% sensitivity and 54.3% specificity for identifying the CVST. CONCLUSION: Attenuation value >60.4 HU and H: H ratio >1.42 calculated based on unenhanced CT can be used as reliable methods to detect CVST in the absence of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance venography in the emergency setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6788179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67881792019-10-16 Are cerebral veins hounsfield unit and H: H ratio calculating in unenhanced CT eligible to diagnosis of acute cerebral vein thrombosis? Shayganfar, Azin Azad, Roya Taki, Maryam J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: For both the clinician and a radiologist, the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), because of the variety of signs and symptoms, remains a challenge. In this study, the role of unenhanced brain computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of CVST was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case–control study, unenhanced CT of 35 patients with acute CVST was compared with 70 normal patients. Hematocrit (HCT), creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen were recorded in all patients. CT images were read, and the attenuation was measured by two independent experienced radiologists. The H:H ratio was calculated for all patients in both case and control groups to normalized densities regarding HCT. RESULTS: The mean of attenuation in patients was 66.95 ± 10.63 Hounsfield unit (HU) and in the controls was 52.51 ± 2.92 HU (P < 0.0001). The mean of H:H ratio in patients was 1.78 ± 0.40 and in controls was 1.46 ± 0.28 (P < 0.0001). Attenuation >60.4 HU was the best optimal cutoff with area under the curve of 0.918 (0.848–0.962) and had 71.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity. H:H ratio >1.42 as the optimal cutoff had 94.3% sensitivity and 54.3% specificity for identifying the CVST. CONCLUSION: Attenuation value >60.4 HU and H: H ratio >1.42 calculated based on unenhanced CT can be used as reliable methods to detect CVST in the absence of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance venography in the emergency setting. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6788179/ /pubmed/31620182 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_1027_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shayganfar, Azin
Azad, Roya
Taki, Maryam
Are cerebral veins hounsfield unit and H: H ratio calculating in unenhanced CT eligible to diagnosis of acute cerebral vein thrombosis?
title Are cerebral veins hounsfield unit and H: H ratio calculating in unenhanced CT eligible to diagnosis of acute cerebral vein thrombosis?
title_full Are cerebral veins hounsfield unit and H: H ratio calculating in unenhanced CT eligible to diagnosis of acute cerebral vein thrombosis?
title_fullStr Are cerebral veins hounsfield unit and H: H ratio calculating in unenhanced CT eligible to diagnosis of acute cerebral vein thrombosis?
title_full_unstemmed Are cerebral veins hounsfield unit and H: H ratio calculating in unenhanced CT eligible to diagnosis of acute cerebral vein thrombosis?
title_short Are cerebral veins hounsfield unit and H: H ratio calculating in unenhanced CT eligible to diagnosis of acute cerebral vein thrombosis?
title_sort are cerebral veins hounsfield unit and h: h ratio calculating in unenhanced ct eligible to diagnosis of acute cerebral vein thrombosis?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6788179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620182
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_1027_18
work_keys_str_mv AT shayganfarazin arecerebralveinshounsfieldunitandhhratiocalculatinginunenhancedcteligibletodiagnosisofacutecerebralveinthrombosis
AT azadroya arecerebralveinshounsfieldunitandhhratiocalculatinginunenhancedcteligibletodiagnosisofacutecerebralveinthrombosis
AT takimaryam arecerebralveinshounsfieldunitandhhratiocalculatinginunenhancedcteligibletodiagnosisofacutecerebralveinthrombosis