Cargando…

Extraction Socket Preservation with or without Membranes, Soft Tissue Influence on Post Extraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess quantitatively and qualitatively the influence of two different factors: membranes and soft tissue graft influence for the extraction socket preservation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A wide-ranging electronic search was performed in six datab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faria-Almeida, Ricardo, Astramskaite-Januseviciene, Inesa, Puisys, Algirdas, Correia, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Stilus Optimus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6788420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620267
http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2019.10305
_version_ 1783458486199255040
author Faria-Almeida, Ricardo
Astramskaite-Januseviciene, Inesa
Puisys, Algirdas
Correia, Francisco
author_facet Faria-Almeida, Ricardo
Astramskaite-Januseviciene, Inesa
Puisys, Algirdas
Correia, Francisco
author_sort Faria-Almeida, Ricardo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess quantitatively and qualitatively the influence of two different factors: membranes and soft tissue graft influence for the extraction socket preservation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A wide-ranging electronic search was performed in six databases up to 30 of November 2018 in order to identify all the clinical and randomized clinical trials performed in humans published with no data restriction. The inclusion criteria were extraction socket preservation with and without membranes or a soft tissue graft in a intact socket with at least six months of follow-up, have more than 12 patients or treat more than 12 sites per group and evaluated at least one of the primary outcomes measures (radiographic measures histological assessment, clinical measures). RESULTS: From an initial search of 1524 studies only 6 papers fulfil the inclusion and exclusion criterions. All the six selected papers, presented a wide heterogeneity of treatments used, evaluated variables and observation period that made impossible to recommend any specific techniques and/or material to achieve better results. The limited data found suggest that the used of membrane reveals to achieve better results. It wasn’t possible to observe in any clinical trial that compares the used of soft tissue graft. CONCLUSIONS: New trials need to be performed in order to identify what specific techniques and/or materials are better to decrease the reabsorption of the socket after tooth extraction. Clinical trials designed to understand when/how the soft tissues grafts influence at the socket preservation is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6788420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Stilus Optimus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67884202019-10-16 Extraction Socket Preservation with or without Membranes, Soft Tissue Influence on Post Extraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review Faria-Almeida, Ricardo Astramskaite-Januseviciene, Inesa Puisys, Algirdas Correia, Francisco J Oral Maxillofac Res Literature Review OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess quantitatively and qualitatively the influence of two different factors: membranes and soft tissue graft influence for the extraction socket preservation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A wide-ranging electronic search was performed in six databases up to 30 of November 2018 in order to identify all the clinical and randomized clinical trials performed in humans published with no data restriction. The inclusion criteria were extraction socket preservation with and without membranes or a soft tissue graft in a intact socket with at least six months of follow-up, have more than 12 patients or treat more than 12 sites per group and evaluated at least one of the primary outcomes measures (radiographic measures histological assessment, clinical measures). RESULTS: From an initial search of 1524 studies only 6 papers fulfil the inclusion and exclusion criterions. All the six selected papers, presented a wide heterogeneity of treatments used, evaluated variables and observation period that made impossible to recommend any specific techniques and/or material to achieve better results. The limited data found suggest that the used of membrane reveals to achieve better results. It wasn’t possible to observe in any clinical trial that compares the used of soft tissue graft. CONCLUSIONS: New trials need to be performed in order to identify what specific techniques and/or materials are better to decrease the reabsorption of the socket after tooth extraction. Clinical trials designed to understand when/how the soft tissues grafts influence at the socket preservation is needed. Stilus Optimus 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6788420/ /pubmed/31620267 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2019.10305 Text en Copyright © Faria-Almeida R, Astramskaite-Januseviciene I, Puisys A, Correia F. Published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH (http://www.ejomr.org), 5 September 2019. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article, first published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 UnportedLicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work and is properly cited. The copyright, license information and link to the original publication on (http://www.ejomr.org) must be included.
spellingShingle Literature Review
Faria-Almeida, Ricardo
Astramskaite-Januseviciene, Inesa
Puisys, Algirdas
Correia, Francisco
Extraction Socket Preservation with or without Membranes, Soft Tissue Influence on Post Extraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review
title Extraction Socket Preservation with or without Membranes, Soft Tissue Influence on Post Extraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review
title_full Extraction Socket Preservation with or without Membranes, Soft Tissue Influence on Post Extraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Extraction Socket Preservation with or without Membranes, Soft Tissue Influence on Post Extraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Extraction Socket Preservation with or without Membranes, Soft Tissue Influence on Post Extraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review
title_short Extraction Socket Preservation with or without Membranes, Soft Tissue Influence on Post Extraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review
title_sort extraction socket preservation with or without membranes, soft tissue influence on post extraction alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review
topic Literature Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6788420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620267
http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2019.10305
work_keys_str_mv AT fariaalmeidaricardo extractionsocketpreservationwithorwithoutmembranessofttissueinfluenceonpostextractionalveolarridgepreservationasystematicreview
AT astramskaitejanusevicieneinesa extractionsocketpreservationwithorwithoutmembranessofttissueinfluenceonpostextractionalveolarridgepreservationasystematicreview
AT puisysalgirdas extractionsocketpreservationwithorwithoutmembranessofttissueinfluenceonpostextractionalveolarridgepreservationasystematicreview
AT correiafrancisco extractionsocketpreservationwithorwithoutmembranessofttissueinfluenceonpostextractionalveolarridgepreservationasystematicreview