Cargando…
Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring
BACKGROUND: Cardiac telemetry monitoring is widely utilized for a variety of clinical indications, yet indication‐specific event rates for monitored patients are seldomly reported. HYPOTHESIS: High‐risk hospitalized patients for clinical deterioration can be identified using standardized telemetry m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6788477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23244 |
_version_ | 1783458498590277632 |
---|---|
author | Cantillon, Daniel J. Burkle, Alicia Kirkwood, Desiree Loy, Molly Amuthan, Ram Pengel, Shannon Tote, John Morris, William Houghtaling, Penny L. Hamilton, Aaron C. Petre, Marc Khot, Umesh N. Lindsay, Bruce D. |
author_facet | Cantillon, Daniel J. Burkle, Alicia Kirkwood, Desiree Loy, Molly Amuthan, Ram Pengel, Shannon Tote, John Morris, William Houghtaling, Penny L. Hamilton, Aaron C. Petre, Marc Khot, Umesh N. Lindsay, Bruce D. |
author_sort | Cantillon, Daniel J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiac telemetry monitoring is widely utilized for a variety of clinical indications, yet indication‐specific event rates for monitored patients are seldomly reported. HYPOTHESIS: High‐risk hospitalized patients for clinical deterioration can be identified using standardized telemetry monitoring indications. METHODS: Adjudicated data from events triggering emergency response team (ERT) activation were systematically characterized at the Cleveland Clinic from among standardized telemetry indications ordered over a 13‐month period. RESULTS: Among 72 199 orders created for telemetry monitored patients, ERT activation occurred in 2677 patients (3.7%), of which 1326 (49.5%) were cardiac‐related. Patients with deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) demonstrated the highest overall event rate (ERT: n = 41 of 593 pts [6.9%]; 25/41 cardiac related [61%]). Cardiac‐related events were proportionally highest among patients with coronary disease awaiting revascularization (ERT: n = 19 of 847 patients [2.2%]; 13/19 cardiac‐related [68.4%]). Arrhythmia‐specific events were highest among patients who underwent cardiac surgery (n = 78 of 193 cardiac‐related ERT [40.4%]), and patients with known or suspected tachyarrhythmias (n = 318 of 788 cardiac‐related ERT [40.4%]). Bubble plot analysis identified patients hospitalized with DVT/PE, drug or alcohol exposures, and acute coronary syndrome as among the highest overall and cardiac‐related events while identifying patients with respiratory disorder monitoring indications as carrying the highest noncardiac event rate. CONCLUSION: High‐risk hospitalized patients can be identified by telemetry indication and prioritized according to concerns for cardiac, arrhythmia‐specific and noncardiac clinical deterioration. This is particularly useful when monitored bed resources are constrained. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6788477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67884772019-10-18 Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring Cantillon, Daniel J. Burkle, Alicia Kirkwood, Desiree Loy, Molly Amuthan, Ram Pengel, Shannon Tote, John Morris, William Houghtaling, Penny L. Hamilton, Aaron C. Petre, Marc Khot, Umesh N. Lindsay, Bruce D. Clin Cardiol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Cardiac telemetry monitoring is widely utilized for a variety of clinical indications, yet indication‐specific event rates for monitored patients are seldomly reported. HYPOTHESIS: High‐risk hospitalized patients for clinical deterioration can be identified using standardized telemetry monitoring indications. METHODS: Adjudicated data from events triggering emergency response team (ERT) activation were systematically characterized at the Cleveland Clinic from among standardized telemetry indications ordered over a 13‐month period. RESULTS: Among 72 199 orders created for telemetry monitored patients, ERT activation occurred in 2677 patients (3.7%), of which 1326 (49.5%) were cardiac‐related. Patients with deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) demonstrated the highest overall event rate (ERT: n = 41 of 593 pts [6.9%]; 25/41 cardiac related [61%]). Cardiac‐related events were proportionally highest among patients with coronary disease awaiting revascularization (ERT: n = 19 of 847 patients [2.2%]; 13/19 cardiac‐related [68.4%]). Arrhythmia‐specific events were highest among patients who underwent cardiac surgery (n = 78 of 193 cardiac‐related ERT [40.4%]), and patients with known or suspected tachyarrhythmias (n = 318 of 788 cardiac‐related ERT [40.4%]). Bubble plot analysis identified patients hospitalized with DVT/PE, drug or alcohol exposures, and acute coronary syndrome as among the highest overall and cardiac‐related events while identifying patients with respiratory disorder monitoring indications as carrying the highest noncardiac event rate. CONCLUSION: High‐risk hospitalized patients can be identified by telemetry indication and prioritized according to concerns for cardiac, arrhythmia‐specific and noncardiac clinical deterioration. This is particularly useful when monitored bed resources are constrained. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6788477/ /pubmed/31407351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23244 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Cantillon, Daniel J. Burkle, Alicia Kirkwood, Desiree Loy, Molly Amuthan, Ram Pengel, Shannon Tote, John Morris, William Houghtaling, Penny L. Hamilton, Aaron C. Petre, Marc Khot, Umesh N. Lindsay, Bruce D. Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring |
title | Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring |
title_full | Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring |
title_fullStr | Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed | Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring |
title_short | Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring |
title_sort | indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6788477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23244 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cantillondanielj indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring AT burklealicia indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring AT kirkwooddesiree indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring AT loymolly indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring AT amuthanram indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring AT pengelshannon indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring AT totejohn indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring AT morriswilliam indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring AT houghtalingpennyl indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring AT hamiltonaaronc indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring AT petremarc indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring AT khotumeshn indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring AT lindsaybruced indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring |