Cargando…

Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring

BACKGROUND: Cardiac telemetry monitoring is widely utilized for a variety of clinical indications, yet indication‐specific event rates for monitored patients are seldomly reported. HYPOTHESIS: High‐risk hospitalized patients for clinical deterioration can be identified using standardized telemetry m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cantillon, Daniel J., Burkle, Alicia, Kirkwood, Desiree, Loy, Molly, Amuthan, Ram, Pengel, Shannon, Tote, John, Morris, William, Houghtaling, Penny L., Hamilton, Aaron C., Petre, Marc, Khot, Umesh N., Lindsay, Bruce D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6788477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23244
_version_ 1783458498590277632
author Cantillon, Daniel J.
Burkle, Alicia
Kirkwood, Desiree
Loy, Molly
Amuthan, Ram
Pengel, Shannon
Tote, John
Morris, William
Houghtaling, Penny L.
Hamilton, Aaron C.
Petre, Marc
Khot, Umesh N.
Lindsay, Bruce D.
author_facet Cantillon, Daniel J.
Burkle, Alicia
Kirkwood, Desiree
Loy, Molly
Amuthan, Ram
Pengel, Shannon
Tote, John
Morris, William
Houghtaling, Penny L.
Hamilton, Aaron C.
Petre, Marc
Khot, Umesh N.
Lindsay, Bruce D.
author_sort Cantillon, Daniel J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac telemetry monitoring is widely utilized for a variety of clinical indications, yet indication‐specific event rates for monitored patients are seldomly reported. HYPOTHESIS: High‐risk hospitalized patients for clinical deterioration can be identified using standardized telemetry monitoring indications. METHODS: Adjudicated data from events triggering emergency response team (ERT) activation were systematically characterized at the Cleveland Clinic from among standardized telemetry indications ordered over a 13‐month period. RESULTS: Among 72 199 orders created for telemetry monitored patients, ERT activation occurred in 2677 patients (3.7%), of which 1326 (49.5%) were cardiac‐related. Patients with deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) demonstrated the highest overall event rate (ERT: n = 41 of 593 pts [6.9%]; 25/41 cardiac related [61%]). Cardiac‐related events were proportionally highest among patients with coronary disease awaiting revascularization (ERT: n = 19 of 847 patients [2.2%]; 13/19 cardiac‐related [68.4%]). Arrhythmia‐specific events were highest among patients who underwent cardiac surgery (n = 78 of 193 cardiac‐related ERT [40.4%]), and patients with known or suspected tachyarrhythmias (n = 318 of 788 cardiac‐related ERT [40.4%]). Bubble plot analysis identified patients hospitalized with DVT/PE, drug or alcohol exposures, and acute coronary syndrome as among the highest overall and cardiac‐related events while identifying patients with respiratory disorder monitoring indications as carrying the highest noncardiac event rate. CONCLUSION: High‐risk hospitalized patients can be identified by telemetry indication and prioritized according to concerns for cardiac, arrhythmia‐specific and noncardiac clinical deterioration. This is particularly useful when monitored bed resources are constrained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6788477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67884772019-10-18 Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring Cantillon, Daniel J. Burkle, Alicia Kirkwood, Desiree Loy, Molly Amuthan, Ram Pengel, Shannon Tote, John Morris, William Houghtaling, Penny L. Hamilton, Aaron C. Petre, Marc Khot, Umesh N. Lindsay, Bruce D. Clin Cardiol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Cardiac telemetry monitoring is widely utilized for a variety of clinical indications, yet indication‐specific event rates for monitored patients are seldomly reported. HYPOTHESIS: High‐risk hospitalized patients for clinical deterioration can be identified using standardized telemetry monitoring indications. METHODS: Adjudicated data from events triggering emergency response team (ERT) activation were systematically characterized at the Cleveland Clinic from among standardized telemetry indications ordered over a 13‐month period. RESULTS: Among 72 199 orders created for telemetry monitored patients, ERT activation occurred in 2677 patients (3.7%), of which 1326 (49.5%) were cardiac‐related. Patients with deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) demonstrated the highest overall event rate (ERT: n = 41 of 593 pts [6.9%]; 25/41 cardiac related [61%]). Cardiac‐related events were proportionally highest among patients with coronary disease awaiting revascularization (ERT: n = 19 of 847 patients [2.2%]; 13/19 cardiac‐related [68.4%]). Arrhythmia‐specific events were highest among patients who underwent cardiac surgery (n = 78 of 193 cardiac‐related ERT [40.4%]), and patients with known or suspected tachyarrhythmias (n = 318 of 788 cardiac‐related ERT [40.4%]). Bubble plot analysis identified patients hospitalized with DVT/PE, drug or alcohol exposures, and acute coronary syndrome as among the highest overall and cardiac‐related events while identifying patients with respiratory disorder monitoring indications as carrying the highest noncardiac event rate. CONCLUSION: High‐risk hospitalized patients can be identified by telemetry indication and prioritized according to concerns for cardiac, arrhythmia‐specific and noncardiac clinical deterioration. This is particularly useful when monitored bed resources are constrained. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6788477/ /pubmed/31407351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23244 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Cantillon, Daniel J.
Burkle, Alicia
Kirkwood, Desiree
Loy, Molly
Amuthan, Ram
Pengel, Shannon
Tote, John
Morris, William
Houghtaling, Penny L.
Hamilton, Aaron C.
Petre, Marc
Khot, Umesh N.
Lindsay, Bruce D.
Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring
title Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring
title_full Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring
title_fullStr Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring
title_short Indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring
title_sort indication‐specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6788477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23244
work_keys_str_mv AT cantillondanielj indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring
AT burklealicia indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring
AT kirkwooddesiree indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring
AT loymolly indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring
AT amuthanram indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring
AT pengelshannon indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring
AT totejohn indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring
AT morriswilliam indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring
AT houghtalingpennyl indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring
AT hamiltonaaronc indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring
AT petremarc indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring
AT khotumeshn indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring
AT lindsaybruced indicationspecificeventratesamonghospitalizedpatientsundergoingcontinuouscardiacmonitoring