Cargando…
Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine
OBJECTIVE: Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM) network is a collaborative group of 69 paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians from 20 countries in Europe, initiated in 2006. To further improve paediatric emergency care in Europe, the aim of this study was to define rese...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6788884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31023707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-316918 |
_version_ | 1783458542763638784 |
---|---|
author | Bressan, Silvia Titomanlio, Luigi Gomez, Borja Mintegi, Santiago Gervaix, Alain Parri, Niccolo Da Dalt, Liviana Moll, Henriette A Waisman, Yehezkel Maconochie, Ian K Oostenbrink, Rianne |
author_facet | Bressan, Silvia Titomanlio, Luigi Gomez, Borja Mintegi, Santiago Gervaix, Alain Parri, Niccolo Da Dalt, Liviana Moll, Henriette A Waisman, Yehezkel Maconochie, Ian K Oostenbrink, Rianne |
author_sort | Bressan, Silvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM) network is a collaborative group of 69 paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians from 20 countries in Europe, initiated in 2006. To further improve paediatric emergency care in Europe, the aim of this study was to define research priorities for PEM in Europe to guide the development of future research projects. DESIGN AND SETTING: We carried out an online survey in a modified three-stage Delphi study. Eligible participants were members of the REPEM network. In stage 1, the REPEM steering committee prepared a list of research topics. In stage 2, REPEM members rated on a 6-point scale research topics and they could add research topics and comment on the list for further refinement. Stage 3 included further prioritisation using the Hanlon Process of Prioritisation (HPP) to give more emphasis to the feasibility of a research topic. RESULTS: Based on 52 respondents (response rates per stage varying from 41% to 57%), we identified the conditions ‘fever’, ‘sepsis’ and ‘respiratory infections’, and the processes/interventions ‘biomarkers’, ‘risk stratification’ and ‘practice variation’ as common themes of research interest. The HPP identified highest priority for 4 of the 5 highest prioritised items by the Delphi process, incorporating prevalence and severity of each condition and feasibility of undertaking such research. CONCLUSIONS: While the high diversity in emergency department (ED) populations, cultures, healthcare systems and healthcare delivery in European PEM prompts to focus on practice variation of ED conditions, our defined research priority list will help guide further collaborative research efforts within the REPEM network to improve PEM care in Europe. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6788884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67888842019-10-25 Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine Bressan, Silvia Titomanlio, Luigi Gomez, Borja Mintegi, Santiago Gervaix, Alain Parri, Niccolo Da Dalt, Liviana Moll, Henriette A Waisman, Yehezkel Maconochie, Ian K Oostenbrink, Rianne Arch Dis Child Original Article OBJECTIVE: Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM) network is a collaborative group of 69 paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians from 20 countries in Europe, initiated in 2006. To further improve paediatric emergency care in Europe, the aim of this study was to define research priorities for PEM in Europe to guide the development of future research projects. DESIGN AND SETTING: We carried out an online survey in a modified three-stage Delphi study. Eligible participants were members of the REPEM network. In stage 1, the REPEM steering committee prepared a list of research topics. In stage 2, REPEM members rated on a 6-point scale research topics and they could add research topics and comment on the list for further refinement. Stage 3 included further prioritisation using the Hanlon Process of Prioritisation (HPP) to give more emphasis to the feasibility of a research topic. RESULTS: Based on 52 respondents (response rates per stage varying from 41% to 57%), we identified the conditions ‘fever’, ‘sepsis’ and ‘respiratory infections’, and the processes/interventions ‘biomarkers’, ‘risk stratification’ and ‘practice variation’ as common themes of research interest. The HPP identified highest priority for 4 of the 5 highest prioritised items by the Delphi process, incorporating prevalence and severity of each condition and feasibility of undertaking such research. CONCLUSIONS: While the high diversity in emergency department (ED) populations, cultures, healthcare systems and healthcare delivery in European PEM prompts to focus on practice variation of ED conditions, our defined research priority list will help guide further collaborative research efforts within the REPEM network to improve PEM care in Europe. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6788884/ /pubmed/31023707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-316918 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bressan, Silvia Titomanlio, Luigi Gomez, Borja Mintegi, Santiago Gervaix, Alain Parri, Niccolo Da Dalt, Liviana Moll, Henriette A Waisman, Yehezkel Maconochie, Ian K Oostenbrink, Rianne Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine |
title | Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine |
title_full | Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine |
title_fullStr | Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine |
title_full_unstemmed | Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine |
title_short | Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine |
title_sort | research priorities for european paediatric emergency medicine |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6788884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31023707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-316918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bressansilvia researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine AT titomanlioluigi researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine AT gomezborja researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine AT mintegisantiago researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine AT gervaixalain researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine AT parriniccolo researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine AT dadaltliviana researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine AT mollhenriettea researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine AT waismanyehezkel researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine AT maconochieiank researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine AT oostenbrinkrianne researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine |