Cargando…

Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine

OBJECTIVE: Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM) network is a collaborative group of 69 paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians from 20 countries in Europe, initiated in 2006. To further improve paediatric emergency care in Europe, the aim of this study was to define rese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bressan, Silvia, Titomanlio, Luigi, Gomez, Borja, Mintegi, Santiago, Gervaix, Alain, Parri, Niccolo, Da Dalt, Liviana, Moll, Henriette A, Waisman, Yehezkel, Maconochie, Ian K, Oostenbrink, Rianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6788884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31023707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-316918
_version_ 1783458542763638784
author Bressan, Silvia
Titomanlio, Luigi
Gomez, Borja
Mintegi, Santiago
Gervaix, Alain
Parri, Niccolo
Da Dalt, Liviana
Moll, Henriette A
Waisman, Yehezkel
Maconochie, Ian K
Oostenbrink, Rianne
author_facet Bressan, Silvia
Titomanlio, Luigi
Gomez, Borja
Mintegi, Santiago
Gervaix, Alain
Parri, Niccolo
Da Dalt, Liviana
Moll, Henriette A
Waisman, Yehezkel
Maconochie, Ian K
Oostenbrink, Rianne
author_sort Bressan, Silvia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM) network is a collaborative group of 69 paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians from 20 countries in Europe, initiated in 2006. To further improve paediatric emergency care in Europe, the aim of this study was to define research priorities for PEM in Europe to guide the development of future research projects. DESIGN AND SETTING: We carried out an online survey in a modified three-stage Delphi study. Eligible participants were members of the REPEM network. In stage 1, the REPEM steering committee prepared a list of research topics. In stage 2, REPEM members rated on a 6-point scale research topics and they could add research topics and comment on the list for further refinement. Stage 3 included further prioritisation using the Hanlon Process of Prioritisation (HPP) to give more emphasis to the feasibility of a research topic. RESULTS: Based on 52 respondents (response rates per stage varying from 41% to 57%), we identified the conditions ‘fever’, ‘sepsis’ and ‘respiratory infections’, and the processes/interventions ‘biomarkers’, ‘risk stratification’ and ‘practice variation’ as common themes of research interest. The HPP identified highest priority for 4 of the 5 highest prioritised items by the Delphi process, incorporating prevalence and severity of each condition and feasibility of undertaking such research. CONCLUSIONS: While the high diversity in emergency department (ED) populations, cultures, healthcare systems and healthcare delivery in European PEM prompts to focus on practice variation of ED conditions, our defined research priority list will help guide further collaborative research efforts within the REPEM network to improve PEM care in Europe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6788884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67888842019-10-25 Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine Bressan, Silvia Titomanlio, Luigi Gomez, Borja Mintegi, Santiago Gervaix, Alain Parri, Niccolo Da Dalt, Liviana Moll, Henriette A Waisman, Yehezkel Maconochie, Ian K Oostenbrink, Rianne Arch Dis Child Original Article OBJECTIVE: Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM) network is a collaborative group of 69 paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians from 20 countries in Europe, initiated in 2006. To further improve paediatric emergency care in Europe, the aim of this study was to define research priorities for PEM in Europe to guide the development of future research projects. DESIGN AND SETTING: We carried out an online survey in a modified three-stage Delphi study. Eligible participants were members of the REPEM network. In stage 1, the REPEM steering committee prepared a list of research topics. In stage 2, REPEM members rated on a 6-point scale research topics and they could add research topics and comment on the list for further refinement. Stage 3 included further prioritisation using the Hanlon Process of Prioritisation (HPP) to give more emphasis to the feasibility of a research topic. RESULTS: Based on 52 respondents (response rates per stage varying from 41% to 57%), we identified the conditions ‘fever’, ‘sepsis’ and ‘respiratory infections’, and the processes/interventions ‘biomarkers’, ‘risk stratification’ and ‘practice variation’ as common themes of research interest. The HPP identified highest priority for 4 of the 5 highest prioritised items by the Delphi process, incorporating prevalence and severity of each condition and feasibility of undertaking such research. CONCLUSIONS: While the high diversity in emergency department (ED) populations, cultures, healthcare systems and healthcare delivery in European PEM prompts to focus on practice variation of ED conditions, our defined research priority list will help guide further collaborative research efforts within the REPEM network to improve PEM care in Europe. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6788884/ /pubmed/31023707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-316918 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bressan, Silvia
Titomanlio, Luigi
Gomez, Borja
Mintegi, Santiago
Gervaix, Alain
Parri, Niccolo
Da Dalt, Liviana
Moll, Henriette A
Waisman, Yehezkel
Maconochie, Ian K
Oostenbrink, Rianne
Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine
title Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine
title_full Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine
title_fullStr Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine
title_full_unstemmed Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine
title_short Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine
title_sort research priorities for european paediatric emergency medicine
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6788884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31023707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-316918
work_keys_str_mv AT bressansilvia researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine
AT titomanlioluigi researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine
AT gomezborja researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine
AT mintegisantiago researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine
AT gervaixalain researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine
AT parriniccolo researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine
AT dadaltliviana researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine
AT mollhenriettea researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine
AT waismanyehezkel researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine
AT maconochieiank researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine
AT oostenbrinkrianne researchprioritiesforeuropeanpaediatricemergencymedicine