Cargando…
Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough
INTRODUCTION: The observation period was recently challenged by some studies; and it has been suggested that a 1-hour observation period may be sufficient to allow safe discharge in asymptomatic patients with penetrating thoracic injury (PTI) and normal initial Chest X-Ray (CXR). OBJECTIVE: The curr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6789061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31633094 http://dx.doi.org/10.22114/ajem.v0i0.148 |
_version_ | 1783458565832310784 |
---|---|
author | Heydari, Farhad Masoumi, Babak Zamani, Majid Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad |
author_facet | Heydari, Farhad Masoumi, Babak Zamani, Majid Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad |
author_sort | Heydari, Farhad |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The observation period was recently challenged by some studies; and it has been suggested that a 1-hour observation period may be sufficient to allow safe discharge in asymptomatic patients with penetrating thoracic injury (PTI) and normal initial Chest X-Ray (CXR). OBJECTIVE: The current study was performed to investigate if in asymptomatic and hemodynamically stable patients with PTIs who has an initial normal evaluation, 1-hour observation interval is safe to detect clinically significant injuries and is it possible to discharge these patients safely after a negative Extended – Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (E-FAST) at hour1 instead of hour 3. METHOD: This cross-sectional study was performed on asymptomatic patients with penetrating thoracic injury, referred to emergency department (ED) and normal initial CXR and the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (E-FAST). The second E-FAST was done 1 hour after the first one and the third repeat E-FAST and control CXR then performed 3 hours post-injury. 24 hours follow up by phone call was done for each patient after discharge. RESULTS: Finally, 117 patients with the average ages of 25.9 ± 7.8 years were enrolled of whom 92.5% were male. Eight patients developed PTX or HTX during first hour of observation that were diagnosed by E-FAST or CT scan requested by the in-charge physician. One hundred-nine patient completed E-FAST and radiograph studies at times zero, 1 h, and 3 h. One patient had a normal initial evaluation but demonstrated a PTX on the 3-h managed without intervention. The rate of delayed abnormality after an initially normal study was 7.7 % (9/117). No discharged patients returned to our ED with delayed manifestations of either PTX or HTX. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that asymptomatic patients with PTI with negative initial evaluation and no deterioration at intervals, about 1 hour may be sufficient for detection of clinically significant pathology, considered for safe and early discharge. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6789061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67890612019-10-18 Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough Heydari, Farhad Masoumi, Babak Zamani, Majid Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad Adv J Emerg Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: The observation period was recently challenged by some studies; and it has been suggested that a 1-hour observation period may be sufficient to allow safe discharge in asymptomatic patients with penetrating thoracic injury (PTI) and normal initial Chest X-Ray (CXR). OBJECTIVE: The current study was performed to investigate if in asymptomatic and hemodynamically stable patients with PTIs who has an initial normal evaluation, 1-hour observation interval is safe to detect clinically significant injuries and is it possible to discharge these patients safely after a negative Extended – Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (E-FAST) at hour1 instead of hour 3. METHOD: This cross-sectional study was performed on asymptomatic patients with penetrating thoracic injury, referred to emergency department (ED) and normal initial CXR and the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (E-FAST). The second E-FAST was done 1 hour after the first one and the third repeat E-FAST and control CXR then performed 3 hours post-injury. 24 hours follow up by phone call was done for each patient after discharge. RESULTS: Finally, 117 patients with the average ages of 25.9 ± 7.8 years were enrolled of whom 92.5% were male. Eight patients developed PTX or HTX during first hour of observation that were diagnosed by E-FAST or CT scan requested by the in-charge physician. One hundred-nine patient completed E-FAST and radiograph studies at times zero, 1 h, and 3 h. One patient had a normal initial evaluation but demonstrated a PTX on the 3-h managed without intervention. The rate of delayed abnormality after an initially normal study was 7.7 % (9/117). No discharged patients returned to our ED with delayed manifestations of either PTX or HTX. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that asymptomatic patients with PTI with negative initial evaluation and no deterioration at intervals, about 1 hour may be sufficient for detection of clinically significant pathology, considered for safe and early discharge. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2019-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6789061/ /pubmed/31633094 http://dx.doi.org/10.22114/ajem.v0i0.148 Text en Copyright© 2019 Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Heydari, Farhad Masoumi, Babak Zamani, Majid Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough |
title | Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough |
title_full | Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough |
title_fullStr | Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough |
title_short | Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough |
title_sort | prospective evaluation of safe observation period after asymptomatic penetrating thoracic injury: 1 hour is enough |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6789061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31633094 http://dx.doi.org/10.22114/ajem.v0i0.148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heydarifarhad prospectiveevaluationofsafeobservationperiodafterasymptomaticpenetratingthoracicinjury1hourisenough AT masoumibabak prospectiveevaluationofsafeobservationperiodafterasymptomaticpenetratingthoracicinjury1hourisenough AT zamanimajid prospectiveevaluationofsafeobservationperiodafterasymptomaticpenetratingthoracicinjury1hourisenough AT nasresfahanimohammad prospectiveevaluationofsafeobservationperiodafterasymptomaticpenetratingthoracicinjury1hourisenough |