Cargando…

Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough

INTRODUCTION: The observation period was recently challenged by some studies; and it has been suggested that a 1-hour observation period may be sufficient to allow safe discharge in asymptomatic patients with penetrating thoracic injury (PTI) and normal initial Chest X-Ray (CXR). OBJECTIVE: The curr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heydari, Farhad, Masoumi, Babak, Zamani, Majid, Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6789061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31633094
http://dx.doi.org/10.22114/ajem.v0i0.148
_version_ 1783458565832310784
author Heydari, Farhad
Masoumi, Babak
Zamani, Majid
Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad
author_facet Heydari, Farhad
Masoumi, Babak
Zamani, Majid
Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad
author_sort Heydari, Farhad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The observation period was recently challenged by some studies; and it has been suggested that a 1-hour observation period may be sufficient to allow safe discharge in asymptomatic patients with penetrating thoracic injury (PTI) and normal initial Chest X-Ray (CXR). OBJECTIVE: The current study was performed to investigate if in asymptomatic and hemodynamically stable patients with PTIs who has an initial normal evaluation, 1-hour observation interval is safe to detect clinically significant injuries and is it possible to discharge these patients safely after a negative Extended – Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (E-FAST) at hour1 instead of hour 3. METHOD: This cross-sectional study was performed on asymptomatic patients with penetrating thoracic injury, referred to emergency department (ED) and normal initial CXR and the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (E-FAST). The second E-FAST was done 1 hour after the first one and the third repeat E-FAST and control CXR then performed 3 hours post-injury. 24 hours follow up by phone call was done for each patient after discharge. RESULTS: Finally, 117 patients with the average ages of 25.9 ± 7.8 years were enrolled of whom 92.5% were male. Eight patients developed PTX or HTX during first hour of observation that were diagnosed by E-FAST or CT scan requested by the in-charge physician. One hundred-nine patient completed E-FAST and radiograph studies at times zero, 1 h, and 3 h. One patient had a normal initial evaluation but demonstrated a PTX on the 3-h managed without intervention. The rate of delayed abnormality after an initially normal study was 7.7 % (9/117). No discharged patients returned to our ED with delayed manifestations of either PTX or HTX. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that asymptomatic patients with PTI with negative initial evaluation and no deterioration at intervals, about 1 hour may be sufficient for detection of clinically significant pathology, considered for safe and early discharge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6789061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67890612019-10-18 Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough Heydari, Farhad Masoumi, Babak Zamani, Majid Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad Adv J Emerg Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: The observation period was recently challenged by some studies; and it has been suggested that a 1-hour observation period may be sufficient to allow safe discharge in asymptomatic patients with penetrating thoracic injury (PTI) and normal initial Chest X-Ray (CXR). OBJECTIVE: The current study was performed to investigate if in asymptomatic and hemodynamically stable patients with PTIs who has an initial normal evaluation, 1-hour observation interval is safe to detect clinically significant injuries and is it possible to discharge these patients safely after a negative Extended – Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (E-FAST) at hour1 instead of hour 3. METHOD: This cross-sectional study was performed on asymptomatic patients with penetrating thoracic injury, referred to emergency department (ED) and normal initial CXR and the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (E-FAST). The second E-FAST was done 1 hour after the first one and the third repeat E-FAST and control CXR then performed 3 hours post-injury. 24 hours follow up by phone call was done for each patient after discharge. RESULTS: Finally, 117 patients with the average ages of 25.9 ± 7.8 years were enrolled of whom 92.5% were male. Eight patients developed PTX or HTX during first hour of observation that were diagnosed by E-FAST or CT scan requested by the in-charge physician. One hundred-nine patient completed E-FAST and radiograph studies at times zero, 1 h, and 3 h. One patient had a normal initial evaluation but demonstrated a PTX on the 3-h managed without intervention. The rate of delayed abnormality after an initially normal study was 7.7 % (9/117). No discharged patients returned to our ED with delayed manifestations of either PTX or HTX. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that asymptomatic patients with PTI with negative initial evaluation and no deterioration at intervals, about 1 hour may be sufficient for detection of clinically significant pathology, considered for safe and early discharge. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2019-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6789061/ /pubmed/31633094 http://dx.doi.org/10.22114/ajem.v0i0.148 Text en Copyright© 2019 Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Heydari, Farhad
Masoumi, Babak
Zamani, Majid
Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad
Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough
title Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough
title_full Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough
title_fullStr Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough
title_short Prospective Evaluation of Safe Observation Period after Asymptomatic Penetrating Thoracic Injury: 1 Hour is Enough
title_sort prospective evaluation of safe observation period after asymptomatic penetrating thoracic injury: 1 hour is enough
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6789061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31633094
http://dx.doi.org/10.22114/ajem.v0i0.148
work_keys_str_mv AT heydarifarhad prospectiveevaluationofsafeobservationperiodafterasymptomaticpenetratingthoracicinjury1hourisenough
AT masoumibabak prospectiveevaluationofsafeobservationperiodafterasymptomaticpenetratingthoracicinjury1hourisenough
AT zamanimajid prospectiveevaluationofsafeobservationperiodafterasymptomaticpenetratingthoracicinjury1hourisenough
AT nasresfahanimohammad prospectiveevaluationofsafeobservationperiodafterasymptomaticpenetratingthoracicinjury1hourisenough