Cargando…
Effective use of the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team classification based on diagnostic performance and confidence level
Five years have passed since the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team (JNET) classification was proposed in 2014. However, the diagnostic performance of this classification has not yet been established. We conducted a retrospective study and a systematic search of Medical Literature Analysis and Re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6789391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616682 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2658 |
_version_ | 1783458603970068480 |
---|---|
author | Hirata, Daizen Kashida, Hiroshi Iwatate, Mineo Tochio, Tomomasa Teramoto, Akira Sano, Yasushi Kudo, Masatoshi |
author_facet | Hirata, Daizen Kashida, Hiroshi Iwatate, Mineo Tochio, Tomomasa Teramoto, Akira Sano, Yasushi Kudo, Masatoshi |
author_sort | Hirata, Daizen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Five years have passed since the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team (JNET) classification was proposed in 2014. However, the diagnostic performance of this classification has not yet been established. We conducted a retrospective study and a systematic search of Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System On-Line. There were three retrospective single center studies about the diagnostic performance of this classification. In order to clarify this issue, we reviewed our study and three previous studies. This review revealed the diagnostic performance in regards to three important differentiations. (1) Neoplasia from non-neoplasia; (2) malignant neoplasia from benign neoplasia; and (3) deep submucosal invasive cancer (D-SMC) from other neoplasia. The sensitivity in differentiating neoplasia from non-neoplasia was 98.1%-99.8%. The specificity in differentiating malignant neoplasia from benign neoplasia was 84.7%-98.2% and the specificity in the differentiation D-SMC from other neoplasia was 99.8%-100.0%. This classification would enable endoscopists to identify almost all neoplasia, to appropriately determine whether to perform en bloc resection or not, and to avoid unnecessary surgery. This article is the first review about the diagnostic performance of the JNET classification. Previous reports about the diagnostic performance have all been retrospective single center studies. A large-scale prospective multicenter evaluation study is awaited for the validation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6789391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67893912019-10-15 Effective use of the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team classification based on diagnostic performance and confidence level Hirata, Daizen Kashida, Hiroshi Iwatate, Mineo Tochio, Tomomasa Teramoto, Akira Sano, Yasushi Kudo, Masatoshi World J Clin Cases Opinion Review Five years have passed since the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team (JNET) classification was proposed in 2014. However, the diagnostic performance of this classification has not yet been established. We conducted a retrospective study and a systematic search of Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System On-Line. There were three retrospective single center studies about the diagnostic performance of this classification. In order to clarify this issue, we reviewed our study and three previous studies. This review revealed the diagnostic performance in regards to three important differentiations. (1) Neoplasia from non-neoplasia; (2) malignant neoplasia from benign neoplasia; and (3) deep submucosal invasive cancer (D-SMC) from other neoplasia. The sensitivity in differentiating neoplasia from non-neoplasia was 98.1%-99.8%. The specificity in differentiating malignant neoplasia from benign neoplasia was 84.7%-98.2% and the specificity in the differentiation D-SMC from other neoplasia was 99.8%-100.0%. This classification would enable endoscopists to identify almost all neoplasia, to appropriately determine whether to perform en bloc resection or not, and to avoid unnecessary surgery. This article is the first review about the diagnostic performance of the JNET classification. Previous reports about the diagnostic performance have all been retrospective single center studies. A large-scale prospective multicenter evaluation study is awaited for the validation. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-09-26 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6789391/ /pubmed/31616682 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2658 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Review Hirata, Daizen Kashida, Hiroshi Iwatate, Mineo Tochio, Tomomasa Teramoto, Akira Sano, Yasushi Kudo, Masatoshi Effective use of the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team classification based on diagnostic performance and confidence level |
title | Effective use of the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team classification based on diagnostic performance and confidence level |
title_full | Effective use of the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team classification based on diagnostic performance and confidence level |
title_fullStr | Effective use of the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team classification based on diagnostic performance and confidence level |
title_full_unstemmed | Effective use of the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team classification based on diagnostic performance and confidence level |
title_short | Effective use of the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team classification based on diagnostic performance and confidence level |
title_sort | effective use of the japan narrow band imaging expert team classification based on diagnostic performance and confidence level |
topic | Opinion Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6789391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616682 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2658 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hiratadaizen effectiveuseofthejapannarrowbandimagingexpertteamclassificationbasedondiagnosticperformanceandconfidencelevel AT kashidahiroshi effectiveuseofthejapannarrowbandimagingexpertteamclassificationbasedondiagnosticperformanceandconfidencelevel AT iwatatemineo effectiveuseofthejapannarrowbandimagingexpertteamclassificationbasedondiagnosticperformanceandconfidencelevel AT tochiotomomasa effectiveuseofthejapannarrowbandimagingexpertteamclassificationbasedondiagnosticperformanceandconfidencelevel AT teramotoakira effectiveuseofthejapannarrowbandimagingexpertteamclassificationbasedondiagnosticperformanceandconfidencelevel AT sanoyasushi effectiveuseofthejapannarrowbandimagingexpertteamclassificationbasedondiagnosticperformanceandconfidencelevel AT kudomasatoshi effectiveuseofthejapannarrowbandimagingexpertteamclassificationbasedondiagnosticperformanceandconfidencelevel |