Cargando…
Is there any benefit to adding students to the European council on chiropractic education evaluation teams and general council? An audit of stakeholders
BACKGROUND: The European Council on Chiropractic Education (ECCE) is currently the only chiropractic specific accrediting body in the world to include students as equal members on Council and accreditation evaluation teams. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate feedback from four ECCE...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0274-7 |
_version_ | 1783458761567895552 |
---|---|
author | Peterson, Cynthia Miller, Joyce Humphreys, B. Kim Vall, Ken |
author_facet | Peterson, Cynthia Miller, Joyce Humphreys, B. Kim Vall, Ken |
author_sort | Peterson, Cynthia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The European Council on Chiropractic Education (ECCE) is currently the only chiropractic specific accrediting body in the world to include students as equal members on Council and accreditation evaluation teams. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate feedback from four ECCE stakeholder groups regarding the effectiveness of chiropractic students on ECCE General Council and evaluation teams. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods audit using questionnaires including closed statements requesting level of agreement and open-ended statements requesting written responses. The proportion of responses falling into the five categorical options for level of agreement was calculated for each questionnaire using descriptive statistics. The analysis of the two statements per questionnaire requiring written responses used a modified ‘thematic analysis’ approach. Three researchers independently identified themes from the written responses. They then met to agree the final themes for each statement. RESULTS: The response rates for the four questionnaires ranged from 87 to 100%. Feedback regarding ‘Student members on General Council’ was the least positive with 65% neutral or negative regarding ‘students being prepared for meetings’. Feedback from stakeholders regarding use of students on evaluation teams was universally positive, ranging from 82.4–100% Strongly Agreeing or Agreeing with each closed statement. Themes were identified for each open statement. The unique contribution students make to evaluation teams was most common. General Council feedback identified ‘lack of student preparation’ and ‘the short time period of student membership’ as important themes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the unique and positive contributions chiropractic students make to accreditation evaluation teams. The results were less positive concerning students on ECCE General Council due to the lack of specific training for their roles and the short time-frame of their membership. Therefore, the ECCE has created training workshops and expanded the time period for students on Council in order to address these issues. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-019-0274-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6790241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67902412019-10-21 Is there any benefit to adding students to the European council on chiropractic education evaluation teams and general council? An audit of stakeholders Peterson, Cynthia Miller, Joyce Humphreys, B. Kim Vall, Ken Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: The European Council on Chiropractic Education (ECCE) is currently the only chiropractic specific accrediting body in the world to include students as equal members on Council and accreditation evaluation teams. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate feedback from four ECCE stakeholder groups regarding the effectiveness of chiropractic students on ECCE General Council and evaluation teams. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods audit using questionnaires including closed statements requesting level of agreement and open-ended statements requesting written responses. The proportion of responses falling into the five categorical options for level of agreement was calculated for each questionnaire using descriptive statistics. The analysis of the two statements per questionnaire requiring written responses used a modified ‘thematic analysis’ approach. Three researchers independently identified themes from the written responses. They then met to agree the final themes for each statement. RESULTS: The response rates for the four questionnaires ranged from 87 to 100%. Feedback regarding ‘Student members on General Council’ was the least positive with 65% neutral or negative regarding ‘students being prepared for meetings’. Feedback from stakeholders regarding use of students on evaluation teams was universally positive, ranging from 82.4–100% Strongly Agreeing or Agreeing with each closed statement. Themes were identified for each open statement. The unique contribution students make to evaluation teams was most common. General Council feedback identified ‘lack of student preparation’ and ‘the short time period of student membership’ as important themes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the unique and positive contributions chiropractic students make to accreditation evaluation teams. The results were less positive concerning students on ECCE General Council due to the lack of specific training for their roles and the short time-frame of their membership. Therefore, the ECCE has created training workshops and expanded the time period for students on Council in order to address these issues. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-019-0274-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6790241/ /pubmed/31636896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0274-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Peterson, Cynthia Miller, Joyce Humphreys, B. Kim Vall, Ken Is there any benefit to adding students to the European council on chiropractic education evaluation teams and general council? An audit of stakeholders |
title | Is there any benefit to adding students to the European council on chiropractic education evaluation teams and general council? An audit of stakeholders |
title_full | Is there any benefit to adding students to the European council on chiropractic education evaluation teams and general council? An audit of stakeholders |
title_fullStr | Is there any benefit to adding students to the European council on chiropractic education evaluation teams and general council? An audit of stakeholders |
title_full_unstemmed | Is there any benefit to adding students to the European council on chiropractic education evaluation teams and general council? An audit of stakeholders |
title_short | Is there any benefit to adding students to the European council on chiropractic education evaluation teams and general council? An audit of stakeholders |
title_sort | is there any benefit to adding students to the european council on chiropractic education evaluation teams and general council? an audit of stakeholders |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0274-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersoncynthia isthereanybenefittoaddingstudentstotheeuropeancouncilonchiropracticeducationevaluationteamsandgeneralcouncilanauditofstakeholders AT millerjoyce isthereanybenefittoaddingstudentstotheeuropeancouncilonchiropracticeducationevaluationteamsandgeneralcouncilanauditofstakeholders AT humphreysbkim isthereanybenefittoaddingstudentstotheeuropeancouncilonchiropracticeducationevaluationteamsandgeneralcouncilanauditofstakeholders AT vallken isthereanybenefittoaddingstudentstotheeuropeancouncilonchiropracticeducationevaluationteamsandgeneralcouncilanauditofstakeholders |