Cargando…
Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach
Osteochondral tissue engineering aims to regenerate functional tissue‐mimicking physiological properties of injured cartilage and its subchondral bone. Given the distinct structural and biochemical difference between bone and cartilage, bilayered scaffolds, and bioreactors are commonly employed. We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.27127 |
_version_ | 1783458808492720128 |
---|---|
author | Xue, Ruikang Chung, Benedict Tamaddon, Maryam Carr, James Liu, Chaozong Cartmell, Sarah Harriet |
author_facet | Xue, Ruikang Chung, Benedict Tamaddon, Maryam Carr, James Liu, Chaozong Cartmell, Sarah Harriet |
author_sort | Xue, Ruikang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Osteochondral tissue engineering aims to regenerate functional tissue‐mimicking physiological properties of injured cartilage and its subchondral bone. Given the distinct structural and biochemical difference between bone and cartilage, bilayered scaffolds, and bioreactors are commonly employed. We present an osteochondral culture system which cocultured ATDC5 and MC3T3‐E1 cells on an additive manufactured bilayered scaffold in a dual‐chamber perfusion bioreactor. Also, finite element models (FEM) based on the microcomputed tomography image of the manufactured scaffold as well as on the computer‐aided design (CAD) were constructed; the microenvironment inside the two FEM was studied and compared. In vitro results showed that the coculture system supported osteochondral tissue growth in terms of cell viability, proliferation, distribution, and attachment. In silico results showed that the CAD and the actual manufactured scaffold had significant differences in the flow velocity, differentiation media mixing in the bioreactor and fluid‐induced shear stress experienced by the cells. This system was shown to have the desired microenvironment for osteochondral tissue engineering and it can potentially be used as an inexpensive tool for testing newly developed pharmaceutical products for osteochondral defects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6790609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67906092019-10-18 Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach Xue, Ruikang Chung, Benedict Tamaddon, Maryam Carr, James Liu, Chaozong Cartmell, Sarah Harriet Biotechnol Bioeng ARTICLES Osteochondral tissue engineering aims to regenerate functional tissue‐mimicking physiological properties of injured cartilage and its subchondral bone. Given the distinct structural and biochemical difference between bone and cartilage, bilayered scaffolds, and bioreactors are commonly employed. We present an osteochondral culture system which cocultured ATDC5 and MC3T3‐E1 cells on an additive manufactured bilayered scaffold in a dual‐chamber perfusion bioreactor. Also, finite element models (FEM) based on the microcomputed tomography image of the manufactured scaffold as well as on the computer‐aided design (CAD) were constructed; the microenvironment inside the two FEM was studied and compared. In vitro results showed that the coculture system supported osteochondral tissue growth in terms of cell viability, proliferation, distribution, and attachment. In silico results showed that the CAD and the actual manufactured scaffold had significant differences in the flow velocity, differentiation media mixing in the bioreactor and fluid‐induced shear stress experienced by the cells. This system was shown to have the desired microenvironment for osteochondral tissue engineering and it can potentially be used as an inexpensive tool for testing newly developed pharmaceutical products for osteochondral defects. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-31 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6790609/ /pubmed/31334830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.27127 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | ARTICLES Xue, Ruikang Chung, Benedict Tamaddon, Maryam Carr, James Liu, Chaozong Cartmell, Sarah Harriet Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach |
title | Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach |
title_full | Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach |
title_fullStr | Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach |
title_short | Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach |
title_sort | osteochondral tissue coculture: an in vitro and in silico approach |
topic | ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.27127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xueruikang osteochondraltissuecocultureaninvitroandinsilicoapproach AT chungbenedict osteochondraltissuecocultureaninvitroandinsilicoapproach AT tamaddonmaryam osteochondraltissuecocultureaninvitroandinsilicoapproach AT carrjames osteochondraltissuecocultureaninvitroandinsilicoapproach AT liuchaozong osteochondraltissuecocultureaninvitroandinsilicoapproach AT cartmellsarahharriet osteochondraltissuecocultureaninvitroandinsilicoapproach |