Cargando…

Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach

Osteochondral tissue engineering aims to regenerate functional tissue‐mimicking physiological properties of injured cartilage and its subchondral bone. Given the distinct structural and biochemical difference between bone and cartilage, bilayered scaffolds, and bioreactors are commonly employed. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xue, Ruikang, Chung, Benedict, Tamaddon, Maryam, Carr, James, Liu, Chaozong, Cartmell, Sarah Harriet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.27127
_version_ 1783458808492720128
author Xue, Ruikang
Chung, Benedict
Tamaddon, Maryam
Carr, James
Liu, Chaozong
Cartmell, Sarah Harriet
author_facet Xue, Ruikang
Chung, Benedict
Tamaddon, Maryam
Carr, James
Liu, Chaozong
Cartmell, Sarah Harriet
author_sort Xue, Ruikang
collection PubMed
description Osteochondral tissue engineering aims to regenerate functional tissue‐mimicking physiological properties of injured cartilage and its subchondral bone. Given the distinct structural and biochemical difference between bone and cartilage, bilayered scaffolds, and bioreactors are commonly employed. We present an osteochondral culture system which cocultured ATDC5 and MC3T3‐E1 cells on an additive manufactured bilayered scaffold in a dual‐chamber perfusion bioreactor. Also, finite element models (FEM) based on the microcomputed tomography image of the manufactured scaffold as well as on the computer‐aided design (CAD) were constructed; the microenvironment inside the two FEM was studied and compared. In vitro results showed that the coculture system supported osteochondral tissue growth in terms of cell viability, proliferation, distribution, and attachment. In silico results showed that the CAD and the actual manufactured scaffold had significant differences in the flow velocity, differentiation media mixing in the bioreactor and fluid‐induced shear stress experienced by the cells. This system was shown to have the desired microenvironment for osteochondral tissue engineering and it can potentially be used as an inexpensive tool for testing newly developed pharmaceutical products for osteochondral defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6790609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67906092019-10-18 Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach Xue, Ruikang Chung, Benedict Tamaddon, Maryam Carr, James Liu, Chaozong Cartmell, Sarah Harriet Biotechnol Bioeng ARTICLES Osteochondral tissue engineering aims to regenerate functional tissue‐mimicking physiological properties of injured cartilage and its subchondral bone. Given the distinct structural and biochemical difference between bone and cartilage, bilayered scaffolds, and bioreactors are commonly employed. We present an osteochondral culture system which cocultured ATDC5 and MC3T3‐E1 cells on an additive manufactured bilayered scaffold in a dual‐chamber perfusion bioreactor. Also, finite element models (FEM) based on the microcomputed tomography image of the manufactured scaffold as well as on the computer‐aided design (CAD) were constructed; the microenvironment inside the two FEM was studied and compared. In vitro results showed that the coculture system supported osteochondral tissue growth in terms of cell viability, proliferation, distribution, and attachment. In silico results showed that the CAD and the actual manufactured scaffold had significant differences in the flow velocity, differentiation media mixing in the bioreactor and fluid‐induced shear stress experienced by the cells. This system was shown to have the desired microenvironment for osteochondral tissue engineering and it can potentially be used as an inexpensive tool for testing newly developed pharmaceutical products for osteochondral defects. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-31 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6790609/ /pubmed/31334830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.27127 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle ARTICLES
Xue, Ruikang
Chung, Benedict
Tamaddon, Maryam
Carr, James
Liu, Chaozong
Cartmell, Sarah Harriet
Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach
title Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach
title_full Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach
title_fullStr Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach
title_full_unstemmed Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach
title_short Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach
title_sort osteochondral tissue coculture: an in vitro and in silico approach
topic ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.27127
work_keys_str_mv AT xueruikang osteochondraltissuecocultureaninvitroandinsilicoapproach
AT chungbenedict osteochondraltissuecocultureaninvitroandinsilicoapproach
AT tamaddonmaryam osteochondraltissuecocultureaninvitroandinsilicoapproach
AT carrjames osteochondraltissuecocultureaninvitroandinsilicoapproach
AT liuchaozong osteochondraltissuecocultureaninvitroandinsilicoapproach
AT cartmellsarahharriet osteochondraltissuecocultureaninvitroandinsilicoapproach