Cargando…

Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone following induction chemotherapy for elderly patients with stage III lung cancer

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether adding concurrent chemotherapy (CT) to definitive radiotherapy (RT) following induction CT is a tolerable and cost effective treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients aged 70 years or older with comorbidities. This study evaluated the actual clinical ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Dong-Yun, Song, Changhoon, Kim, Se Hyun, Kim, Yu Jung, Lee, Jong Seok, Kim, Jae-Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31591865
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2019.00087
_version_ 1783458842429882368
author Kim, Dong-Yun
Song, Changhoon
Kim, Se Hyun
Kim, Yu Jung
Lee, Jong Seok
Kim, Jae-Sung
author_facet Kim, Dong-Yun
Song, Changhoon
Kim, Se Hyun
Kim, Yu Jung
Lee, Jong Seok
Kim, Jae-Sung
author_sort Kim, Dong-Yun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: It is unclear whether adding concurrent chemotherapy (CT) to definitive radiotherapy (RT) following induction CT is a tolerable and cost effective treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients aged 70 years or older with comorbidities. This study evaluated the actual clinical outcomes between concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and RT alone following induction CT or not in patients (≥70 years) in a single institution’s clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 82 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC between 2004 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Their treatment tolerance and clinical outcomes such as overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), treatment toxicities and distant metastasis (DM) were evaluated. Early mortality rates were also evaluated as 4-month mortality after RT. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients received CCRT and 28 patients received RT alone. Induction CT before RT was performed for 68.5% and 50.0% in CCRT and RT alone groups. Treatment tolerance was significantly worse in CCRT (p = 0.046). The median survival was 21.1 and 18.1 months for CCRT and RT alone, which was not statistically significant. LRR and DM were also not different. Most early deaths after CCRT were attributed to non-cancer-related mortality. Acute esophagitis of grade ≥2 occurred more following CCRT (p = 0.017). In multivariate analysis, a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of ≥5 and a weight loss of ≥5% after RT were associated with poor OS. The factors adversely affecting 4-month survival were a CCI of ≥5 and CCRT. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in OS, LRR, and DM between CCRT and RT alone treatment in elderly patients. However, there was a poorer tolerance and higher incidence of acute esophagitis in the CCRT group. Specifically, when the patients had a CCI of ≥5, RT alone seems to be reasonable with a low probability of early death.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6790792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67907922019-10-21 Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone following induction chemotherapy for elderly patients with stage III lung cancer Kim, Dong-Yun Song, Changhoon Kim, Se Hyun Kim, Yu Jung Lee, Jong Seok Kim, Jae-Sung Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: It is unclear whether adding concurrent chemotherapy (CT) to definitive radiotherapy (RT) following induction CT is a tolerable and cost effective treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients aged 70 years or older with comorbidities. This study evaluated the actual clinical outcomes between concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and RT alone following induction CT or not in patients (≥70 years) in a single institution’s clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 82 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC between 2004 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Their treatment tolerance and clinical outcomes such as overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), treatment toxicities and distant metastasis (DM) were evaluated. Early mortality rates were also evaluated as 4-month mortality after RT. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients received CCRT and 28 patients received RT alone. Induction CT before RT was performed for 68.5% and 50.0% in CCRT and RT alone groups. Treatment tolerance was significantly worse in CCRT (p = 0.046). The median survival was 21.1 and 18.1 months for CCRT and RT alone, which was not statistically significant. LRR and DM were also not different. Most early deaths after CCRT were attributed to non-cancer-related mortality. Acute esophagitis of grade ≥2 occurred more following CCRT (p = 0.017). In multivariate analysis, a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of ≥5 and a weight loss of ≥5% after RT were associated with poor OS. The factors adversely affecting 4-month survival were a CCI of ≥5 and CCRT. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in OS, LRR, and DM between CCRT and RT alone treatment in elderly patients. However, there was a poorer tolerance and higher incidence of acute esophagitis in the CCRT group. Specifically, when the patients had a CCI of ≥5, RT alone seems to be reasonable with a low probability of early death. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2019-09 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6790792/ /pubmed/31591865 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2019.00087 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Dong-Yun
Song, Changhoon
Kim, Se Hyun
Kim, Yu Jung
Lee, Jong Seok
Kim, Jae-Sung
Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone following induction chemotherapy for elderly patients with stage III lung cancer
title Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone following induction chemotherapy for elderly patients with stage III lung cancer
title_full Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone following induction chemotherapy for elderly patients with stage III lung cancer
title_fullStr Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone following induction chemotherapy for elderly patients with stage III lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone following induction chemotherapy for elderly patients with stage III lung cancer
title_short Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone following induction chemotherapy for elderly patients with stage III lung cancer
title_sort chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone following induction chemotherapy for elderly patients with stage iii lung cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31591865
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2019.00087
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdongyun chemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyalonefollowinginductionchemotherapyforelderlypatientswithstageiiilungcancer
AT songchanghoon chemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyalonefollowinginductionchemotherapyforelderlypatientswithstageiiilungcancer
AT kimsehyun chemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyalonefollowinginductionchemotherapyforelderlypatientswithstageiiilungcancer
AT kimyujung chemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyalonefollowinginductionchemotherapyforelderlypatientswithstageiiilungcancer
AT leejongseok chemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyalonefollowinginductionchemotherapyforelderlypatientswithstageiiilungcancer
AT kimjaesung chemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyalonefollowinginductionchemotherapyforelderlypatientswithstageiiilungcancer