Cargando…

The value of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: should it always be recommended?

PURPOSE: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is a standard treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) showing a response to initial treatment, but many patients do not receive PCI due to comorbidities or refusal. This study aims to define the patient group for whom PCI can be om...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koh, Minji, Song, Si Yeol, Jo, Ji Hwan, Park, Geumju, Park, Jae Won, Kim, Su Ssan, Choi, Eun Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31591863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2019.00318
_version_ 1783458843442806784
author Koh, Minji
Song, Si Yeol
Jo, Ji Hwan
Park, Geumju
Park, Jae Won
Kim, Su Ssan
Choi, Eun Kyung
author_facet Koh, Minji
Song, Si Yeol
Jo, Ji Hwan
Park, Geumju
Park, Jae Won
Kim, Su Ssan
Choi, Eun Kyung
author_sort Koh, Minji
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is a standard treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) showing a response to initial treatment, but many patients do not receive PCI due to comorbidities or refusal. This study aims to define the patient group for whom PCI can be omitted with minimal risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with LS-SCLC who underwent radiotherapy with curative aim at our institution between January 2004 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who did not receive PCI were evaluated for brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors for survival, and treatment outcomes were compared with a patient cohort who received PCI. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients achieved a response following thoracic radiotherapy, and 190 of these patients did not receive PCI. Stage I–II and a complete response (CR) to initial therapy were good prognostic factors for BMFS and OS on univariate analysis. Patients with both stage I–II and a CR who declined PCI showed comparable 2-year BMFS to those who received PCI (92% vs. 89%). In patients who achieved CR, PCI did not significantly improve OS or PFS. CONCLUSION: There should be less concern about omitting PCI in patients with comorbidities if they have stage I–II or a CR, with brain metastasis control being comparable to those patients who receive PCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6790796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67907962019-10-21 The value of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: should it always be recommended? Koh, Minji Song, Si Yeol Jo, Ji Hwan Park, Geumju Park, Jae Won Kim, Su Ssan Choi, Eun Kyung Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is a standard treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) showing a response to initial treatment, but many patients do not receive PCI due to comorbidities or refusal. This study aims to define the patient group for whom PCI can be omitted with minimal risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with LS-SCLC who underwent radiotherapy with curative aim at our institution between January 2004 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who did not receive PCI were evaluated for brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors for survival, and treatment outcomes were compared with a patient cohort who received PCI. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients achieved a response following thoracic radiotherapy, and 190 of these patients did not receive PCI. Stage I–II and a complete response (CR) to initial therapy were good prognostic factors for BMFS and OS on univariate analysis. Patients with both stage I–II and a CR who declined PCI showed comparable 2-year BMFS to those who received PCI (92% vs. 89%). In patients who achieved CR, PCI did not significantly improve OS or PFS. CONCLUSION: There should be less concern about omitting PCI in patients with comorbidities if they have stage I–II or a CR, with brain metastasis control being comparable to those patients who receive PCI. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2019-09 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6790796/ /pubmed/31591863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2019.00318 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Koh, Minji
Song, Si Yeol
Jo, Ji Hwan
Park, Geumju
Park, Jae Won
Kim, Su Ssan
Choi, Eun Kyung
The value of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: should it always be recommended?
title The value of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: should it always be recommended?
title_full The value of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: should it always be recommended?
title_fullStr The value of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: should it always be recommended?
title_full_unstemmed The value of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: should it always be recommended?
title_short The value of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: should it always be recommended?
title_sort value of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: should it always be recommended?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31591863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2019.00318
work_keys_str_mv AT kohminji thevalueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT songsiyeol thevalueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT jojihwan thevalueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT parkgeumju thevalueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT parkjaewon thevalueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT kimsussan thevalueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT choieunkyung thevalueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT kohminji valueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT songsiyeol valueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT jojihwan valueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT parkgeumju valueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT parkjaewon valueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT kimsussan valueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended
AT choieunkyung valueofprophylacticcranialirradiationinlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancershoulditalwaysberecommended