Cargando…

Sling Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence Including Post Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Challenge to the Urologist

The management of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) is still challenging for urologists. In recent decades, various kinds of male sling system have been developed and introduced; however, they have not yet shown as good a result as that of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). However, a ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Kwang Jin, Kim, Sung Jin, Cho, Sung Tae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Continence Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31607097
http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938108.054
_version_ 1783458845913251840
author Ko, Kwang Jin
Kim, Sung Jin
Cho, Sung Tae
author_facet Ko, Kwang Jin
Kim, Sung Jin
Cho, Sung Tae
author_sort Ko, Kwang Jin
collection PubMed
description The management of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) is still challenging for urologists. In recent decades, various kinds of male sling system have been developed and introduced; however, they have not yet shown as good a result as that of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). However, a male sling is still in an important position because patients have a high demand for sling implantation, and it can allow the avoidance of the use of mechanical devices like AUS. Recently, the male sling has been widely used in mild-to-moderate PPI patients; however, there are no studies that compare individual devices. Thus, it is hard to directly compare the success rate of operation, and it is impossible to judge which sling system is more excellent. It is expected that many sling options will be available in addition to AUS in the near future with the technological development of various male slings and the accumulation of long-term surgical outcomes. In that in patients with PPI, sling implantation is an option that must be explained rather than an option that need not be explained to them, this review would share the latest outcomes and complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6790820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Continence Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67908202019-10-21 Sling Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence Including Post Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Challenge to the Urologist Ko, Kwang Jin Kim, Sung Jin Cho, Sung Tae Int Neurourol J Review Article The management of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) is still challenging for urologists. In recent decades, various kinds of male sling system have been developed and introduced; however, they have not yet shown as good a result as that of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). However, a male sling is still in an important position because patients have a high demand for sling implantation, and it can allow the avoidance of the use of mechanical devices like AUS. Recently, the male sling has been widely used in mild-to-moderate PPI patients; however, there are no studies that compare individual devices. Thus, it is hard to directly compare the success rate of operation, and it is impossible to judge which sling system is more excellent. It is expected that many sling options will be available in addition to AUS in the near future with the technological development of various male slings and the accumulation of long-term surgical outcomes. In that in patients with PPI, sling implantation is an option that must be explained rather than an option that need not be explained to them, this review would share the latest outcomes and complications. Korean Continence Society 2019-09 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6790820/ /pubmed/31607097 http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938108.054 Text en Copyright © 2019 Korean Continence Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ko, Kwang Jin
Kim, Sung Jin
Cho, Sung Tae
Sling Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence Including Post Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Challenge to the Urologist
title Sling Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence Including Post Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Challenge to the Urologist
title_full Sling Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence Including Post Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Challenge to the Urologist
title_fullStr Sling Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence Including Post Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Challenge to the Urologist
title_full_unstemmed Sling Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence Including Post Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Challenge to the Urologist
title_short Sling Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence Including Post Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Challenge to the Urologist
title_sort sling surgery for male urinary incontinence including post prostatectomy incontinence: a challenge to the urologist
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31607097
http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938108.054
work_keys_str_mv AT kokwangjin slingsurgeryformaleurinaryincontinenceincludingpostprostatectomyincontinenceachallengetotheurologist
AT kimsungjin slingsurgeryformaleurinaryincontinenceincludingpostprostatectomyincontinenceachallengetotheurologist
AT chosungtae slingsurgeryformaleurinaryincontinenceincludingpostprostatectomyincontinenceachallengetotheurologist