Cargando…

Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in cardiovascular health care quality improvements: A systematic review

Background: The development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (EB-CPGs) has increasing global growth; however, the certainty of impact on patients and health systems, as well as the magnitude of the impact, is not apparent. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramírez-Morera, Anggie, Tristan, Mario, Vazquez, Juan Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31656589
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18865.3
_version_ 1783458868583464960
author Ramírez-Morera, Anggie
Tristan, Mario
Vazquez, Juan Carlos
author_facet Ramírez-Morera, Anggie
Tristan, Mario
Vazquez, Juan Carlos
author_sort Ramírez-Morera, Anggie
collection PubMed
description Background: The development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (EB-CPGs) has increasing global growth; however, the certainty of impact on patients and health systems, as well as the magnitude of the impact, is not apparent. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of the application of EB-CPGs for the improvement of the quality of health care in three dimensions: structure, process and results in the patient for the management of cardiovascular disease. Methods: We followed the methods described by the Cochrane Handbook and present a descriptive analysis because of the high heterogeneity found across the included studies. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, as well as the grey literature, between 1990 and June 2016. No language restrictions were applied. Only randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were selected. Three authors independently carried out the data extraction, using a modified version of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care form. Results: Of the total of 84 interventions included in the nine RCTs evaluated, three (4%) were related to health care structure, 54 (64%) to the health care delivery process and 27 (32%) to patient outcomes. Regarding the impact of using the EB-CPGs, in 55 interventions (65%), there were no significant differences between control and experimental groups. In four interventions (5%), the result favoured the control group, and the result favoured the intervention group on 25 of the interventions (30%). Conclusions: This systematic review showed that EB-CPGs could be useful to improve the process and structure of health care and, to a lesser extent, to improve the patients’ outcomes. After analysing many studies, we could have one more hypothesis for further research, which could shed more light upon those undiscovered variables that might interfere with the use of the EB-CPGs. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42013003589
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6790909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67909092019-10-24 Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in cardiovascular health care quality improvements: A systematic review Ramírez-Morera, Anggie Tristan, Mario Vazquez, Juan Carlos F1000Res Systematic Review Background: The development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (EB-CPGs) has increasing global growth; however, the certainty of impact on patients and health systems, as well as the magnitude of the impact, is not apparent. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of the application of EB-CPGs for the improvement of the quality of health care in three dimensions: structure, process and results in the patient for the management of cardiovascular disease. Methods: We followed the methods described by the Cochrane Handbook and present a descriptive analysis because of the high heterogeneity found across the included studies. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, as well as the grey literature, between 1990 and June 2016. No language restrictions were applied. Only randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were selected. Three authors independently carried out the data extraction, using a modified version of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care form. Results: Of the total of 84 interventions included in the nine RCTs evaluated, three (4%) were related to health care structure, 54 (64%) to the health care delivery process and 27 (32%) to patient outcomes. Regarding the impact of using the EB-CPGs, in 55 interventions (65%), there were no significant differences between control and experimental groups. In four interventions (5%), the result favoured the control group, and the result favoured the intervention group on 25 of the interventions (30%). Conclusions: This systematic review showed that EB-CPGs could be useful to improve the process and structure of health care and, to a lesser extent, to improve the patients’ outcomes. After analysing many studies, we could have one more hypothesis for further research, which could shed more light upon those undiscovered variables that might interfere with the use of the EB-CPGs. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42013003589 F1000 Research Limited 2019-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6790909/ /pubmed/31656589 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18865.3 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Ramírez-Morera A et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ramírez-Morera, Anggie
Tristan, Mario
Vazquez, Juan Carlos
Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in cardiovascular health care quality improvements: A systematic review
title Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in cardiovascular health care quality improvements: A systematic review
title_full Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in cardiovascular health care quality improvements: A systematic review
title_fullStr Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in cardiovascular health care quality improvements: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in cardiovascular health care quality improvements: A systematic review
title_short Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in cardiovascular health care quality improvements: A systematic review
title_sort effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in cardiovascular health care quality improvements: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6790909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31656589
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18865.3
work_keys_str_mv AT ramirezmoreraanggie effectsofevidencebasedclinicalpracticeguidelinesincardiovascularhealthcarequalityimprovementsasystematicreview
AT tristanmario effectsofevidencebasedclinicalpracticeguidelinesincardiovascularhealthcarequalityimprovementsasystematicreview
AT vazquezjuancarlos effectsofevidencebasedclinicalpracticeguidelinesincardiovascularhealthcarequalityimprovementsasystematicreview