Cargando…

A systematic review of monitoring and evaluation indicators for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a comprehensive mapping of published indicators for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services and outcomes in humanitarian settings. METHODS: A systematic search of the peer-reviewed and grey literature published between January 2008 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Broaddus-Shea, Elena T., Kobeissi, Loulou, Ummer, Osama, Say, Lale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6791013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-019-0221-1
_version_ 1783458897710809088
author Broaddus-Shea, Elena T.
Kobeissi, Loulou
Ummer, Osama
Say, Lale
author_facet Broaddus-Shea, Elena T.
Kobeissi, Loulou
Ummer, Osama
Say, Lale
author_sort Broaddus-Shea, Elena T.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To conduct a comprehensive mapping of published indicators for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services and outcomes in humanitarian settings. METHODS: A systematic search of the peer-reviewed and grey literature published between January 2008 and May 2018 was conducted to identify all references describing indicator sets for M&E of SRH services and outcomes in humanitarian settings. The databases MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Global Health, as well as 85 websites of relevant organizations involved in humanitarian response were searched. Characteristics of identified indicator sets and data from individual indicators was extracted. FINDINGS: Of 3278 records identified, 20 met the review’s inclusion criteria and 9 existing indicator sets were identified. A total of 179 relevant indicators were included in the mapping, and removal of duplicates yielded 132 unique indicators. Twenty-seven percent fell within the maternal health domain, followed by the HIV/AIDS domain (26%) and the gender-based violence domain (23%). The distribution of indicators by type (process/output, outcome, impact) was balanced overall but varied substantially across domains. The most commonly used data collection platforms were facility-based systems or population-based surveys. Domains covered and indicator definitions were inconsistent across indicator sets. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate the need to standardize data collection efforts for M&E of SRH services and outcomes in humanitarian settings and to critically appraise the extent to which different domains should be covered. A core list of indicators is essential for assessing response status over time as well as across countries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13031-019-0221-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6791013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67910132019-10-21 A systematic review of monitoring and evaluation indicators for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings Broaddus-Shea, Elena T. Kobeissi, Loulou Ummer, Osama Say, Lale Confl Health Review OBJECTIVE: To conduct a comprehensive mapping of published indicators for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services and outcomes in humanitarian settings. METHODS: A systematic search of the peer-reviewed and grey literature published between January 2008 and May 2018 was conducted to identify all references describing indicator sets for M&E of SRH services and outcomes in humanitarian settings. The databases MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Global Health, as well as 85 websites of relevant organizations involved in humanitarian response were searched. Characteristics of identified indicator sets and data from individual indicators was extracted. FINDINGS: Of 3278 records identified, 20 met the review’s inclusion criteria and 9 existing indicator sets were identified. A total of 179 relevant indicators were included in the mapping, and removal of duplicates yielded 132 unique indicators. Twenty-seven percent fell within the maternal health domain, followed by the HIV/AIDS domain (26%) and the gender-based violence domain (23%). The distribution of indicators by type (process/output, outcome, impact) was balanced overall but varied substantially across domains. The most commonly used data collection platforms were facility-based systems or population-based surveys. Domains covered and indicator definitions were inconsistent across indicator sets. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate the need to standardize data collection efforts for M&E of SRH services and outcomes in humanitarian settings and to critically appraise the extent to which different domains should be covered. A core list of indicators is essential for assessing response status over time as well as across countries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13031-019-0221-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6791013/ /pubmed/31636697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-019-0221-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Broaddus-Shea, Elena T.
Kobeissi, Loulou
Ummer, Osama
Say, Lale
A systematic review of monitoring and evaluation indicators for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings
title A systematic review of monitoring and evaluation indicators for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings
title_full A systematic review of monitoring and evaluation indicators for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings
title_fullStr A systematic review of monitoring and evaluation indicators for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of monitoring and evaluation indicators for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings
title_short A systematic review of monitoring and evaluation indicators for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings
title_sort systematic review of monitoring and evaluation indicators for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6791013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-019-0221-1
work_keys_str_mv AT broaddussheaelenat asystematicreviewofmonitoringandevaluationindicatorsforsexualandreproductivehealthinhumanitariansettings
AT kobeissiloulou asystematicreviewofmonitoringandevaluationindicatorsforsexualandreproductivehealthinhumanitariansettings
AT ummerosama asystematicreviewofmonitoringandevaluationindicatorsforsexualandreproductivehealthinhumanitariansettings
AT saylale asystematicreviewofmonitoringandevaluationindicatorsforsexualandreproductivehealthinhumanitariansettings
AT broaddussheaelenat systematicreviewofmonitoringandevaluationindicatorsforsexualandreproductivehealthinhumanitariansettings
AT kobeissiloulou systematicreviewofmonitoringandevaluationindicatorsforsexualandreproductivehealthinhumanitariansettings
AT ummerosama systematicreviewofmonitoringandevaluationindicatorsforsexualandreproductivehealthinhumanitariansettings
AT saylale systematicreviewofmonitoringandevaluationindicatorsforsexualandreproductivehealthinhumanitariansettings