Cargando…
Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
PURPOSE: The patient believes in adherence to medication rather than to self-care adherence and lifestyle changes for the management of diabetes. This study was carried out to establish the association of self-care adherence and their barriers in poor glycemic control in our diabetic population. PAT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6791337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632050 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S216842 |
_version_ | 1783458964433797120 |
---|---|
author | Pokhrel, Sushant Shrestha, Sneha Timilsina, Alaska Sapkota, Manisha Bhatt, Mahendra Prasad Pardhe, Bashu Dev |
author_facet | Pokhrel, Sushant Shrestha, Sneha Timilsina, Alaska Sapkota, Manisha Bhatt, Mahendra Prasad Pardhe, Bashu Dev |
author_sort | Pokhrel, Sushant |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The patient believes in adherence to medication rather than to self-care adherence and lifestyle changes for the management of diabetes. This study was carried out to establish the association of self-care adherence and their barriers in poor glycemic control in our diabetic population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 480 already diagnosed diabetes outpatients attended in our two hospitals. Glycaemic control was defined by levels of HbA(1c.) Socio-demographic data, lifestyle variables and anthropometric measurements were recorded using a standard questionnaire. Fasting blood glucose, HbA(1c) and lipid profiles were estimated using the manufacturer’s guideline. Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for comparison between different groups and the correlation was established by Spearman correlation. Risk factors associated with poor glycaemic control were verified by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean HbA(1c) of the study population was 7.4±1.3% and 65.4% had poor glycaemic control with mean 8.0±1.1%. Higher HbA(1c) levels were significantly associated with duration of diabetes, a number of drugs used, patient–physician relationship and knowledge about diabetes. The poor glycaemic control was significantly associated with low adherence of following the meal plan, regular medication and regular exercising (p<0.001). Among all the barriers, a too busy schedule for following the meal plan, taking medications and exercising regularly was significantly correlated with HbA1c levels. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed irregular meal plan (OR=5.27), irregular exercise (OR=2.25), number of medication used (OR= 0.19) and lesser extent patient–physician relationship (OR=2.68) were independent risk factors for poor glycaemic control. CONCLUSION: The poor glycaemic control was associated with poor adherence to self-care adherence and their barriers in our diabetic population. Integrated knowledge on diabetes management should be targeted to improve glycaemic control in our communities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6791337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67913372019-10-18 Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study Pokhrel, Sushant Shrestha, Sneha Timilsina, Alaska Sapkota, Manisha Bhatt, Mahendra Prasad Pardhe, Bashu Dev J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research PURPOSE: The patient believes in adherence to medication rather than to self-care adherence and lifestyle changes for the management of diabetes. This study was carried out to establish the association of self-care adherence and their barriers in poor glycemic control in our diabetic population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 480 already diagnosed diabetes outpatients attended in our two hospitals. Glycaemic control was defined by levels of HbA(1c.) Socio-demographic data, lifestyle variables and anthropometric measurements were recorded using a standard questionnaire. Fasting blood glucose, HbA(1c) and lipid profiles were estimated using the manufacturer’s guideline. Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for comparison between different groups and the correlation was established by Spearman correlation. Risk factors associated with poor glycaemic control were verified by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean HbA(1c) of the study population was 7.4±1.3% and 65.4% had poor glycaemic control with mean 8.0±1.1%. Higher HbA(1c) levels were significantly associated with duration of diabetes, a number of drugs used, patient–physician relationship and knowledge about diabetes. The poor glycaemic control was significantly associated with low adherence of following the meal plan, regular medication and regular exercising (p<0.001). Among all the barriers, a too busy schedule for following the meal plan, taking medications and exercising regularly was significantly correlated with HbA1c levels. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed irregular meal plan (OR=5.27), irregular exercise (OR=2.25), number of medication used (OR= 0.19) and lesser extent patient–physician relationship (OR=2.68) were independent risk factors for poor glycaemic control. CONCLUSION: The poor glycaemic control was associated with poor adherence to self-care adherence and their barriers in our diabetic population. Integrated knowledge on diabetes management should be targeted to improve glycaemic control in our communities. Dove 2019-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6791337/ /pubmed/31632050 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S216842 Text en © 2019 Pokhrel et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Pokhrel, Sushant Shrestha, Sneha Timilsina, Alaska Sapkota, Manisha Bhatt, Mahendra Prasad Pardhe, Bashu Dev Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | self-care adherence and barriers to good glycaemic control in nepalese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a hospital-based cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6791337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632050 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S216842 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pokhrelsushant selfcareadherenceandbarrierstogoodglycaemiccontrolinnepalesetype2diabetesmellituspatientsahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy AT shresthasneha selfcareadherenceandbarrierstogoodglycaemiccontrolinnepalesetype2diabetesmellituspatientsahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy AT timilsinaalaska selfcareadherenceandbarrierstogoodglycaemiccontrolinnepalesetype2diabetesmellituspatientsahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy AT sapkotamanisha selfcareadherenceandbarrierstogoodglycaemiccontrolinnepalesetype2diabetesmellituspatientsahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy AT bhattmahendraprasad selfcareadherenceandbarrierstogoodglycaemiccontrolinnepalesetype2diabetesmellituspatientsahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy AT pardhebashudev selfcareadherenceandbarrierstogoodglycaemiccontrolinnepalesetype2diabetesmellituspatientsahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy |