Cargando…

Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study

PURPOSE: The patient believes in adherence to medication rather than to self-care adherence and lifestyle changes for the management of diabetes. This study was carried out to establish the association of self-care adherence and their barriers in poor glycemic control in our diabetic population. PAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pokhrel, Sushant, Shrestha, Sneha, Timilsina, Alaska, Sapkota, Manisha, Bhatt, Mahendra Prasad, Pardhe, Bashu Dev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6791337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632050
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S216842
_version_ 1783458964433797120
author Pokhrel, Sushant
Shrestha, Sneha
Timilsina, Alaska
Sapkota, Manisha
Bhatt, Mahendra Prasad
Pardhe, Bashu Dev
author_facet Pokhrel, Sushant
Shrestha, Sneha
Timilsina, Alaska
Sapkota, Manisha
Bhatt, Mahendra Prasad
Pardhe, Bashu Dev
author_sort Pokhrel, Sushant
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The patient believes in adherence to medication rather than to self-care adherence and lifestyle changes for the management of diabetes. This study was carried out to establish the association of self-care adherence and their barriers in poor glycemic control in our diabetic population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 480 already diagnosed diabetes outpatients attended in our two hospitals. Glycaemic control was defined by levels of HbA(1c.) Socio-demographic data, lifestyle variables and anthropometric measurements were recorded using a standard questionnaire. Fasting blood glucose, HbA(1c) and lipid profiles were estimated using the manufacturer’s guideline. Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for comparison between different groups and the correlation was established by Spearman correlation. Risk factors associated with poor glycaemic control were verified by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean HbA(1c) of the study population was 7.4±1.3% and 65.4% had poor glycaemic control with mean 8.0±1.1%. Higher HbA(1c) levels were significantly associated with duration of diabetes, a number of drugs used, patient–physician relationship and knowledge about diabetes. The poor glycaemic control was significantly associated with low adherence of following the meal plan, regular medication and regular exercising (p<0.001). Among all the barriers, a too busy schedule for following the meal plan, taking medications and exercising regularly was significantly correlated with HbA1c levels. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed irregular meal plan (OR=5.27), irregular exercise (OR=2.25), number of medication used (OR= 0.19) and lesser extent patient–physician relationship (OR=2.68) were independent risk factors for poor glycaemic control. CONCLUSION: The poor glycaemic control was associated with poor adherence to self-care adherence and their barriers in our diabetic population. Integrated knowledge on diabetes management should be targeted to improve glycaemic control in our communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6791337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67913372019-10-18 Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study Pokhrel, Sushant Shrestha, Sneha Timilsina, Alaska Sapkota, Manisha Bhatt, Mahendra Prasad Pardhe, Bashu Dev J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research PURPOSE: The patient believes in adherence to medication rather than to self-care adherence and lifestyle changes for the management of diabetes. This study was carried out to establish the association of self-care adherence and their barriers in poor glycemic control in our diabetic population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 480 already diagnosed diabetes outpatients attended in our two hospitals. Glycaemic control was defined by levels of HbA(1c.) Socio-demographic data, lifestyle variables and anthropometric measurements were recorded using a standard questionnaire. Fasting blood glucose, HbA(1c) and lipid profiles were estimated using the manufacturer’s guideline. Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for comparison between different groups and the correlation was established by Spearman correlation. Risk factors associated with poor glycaemic control were verified by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean HbA(1c) of the study population was 7.4±1.3% and 65.4% had poor glycaemic control with mean 8.0±1.1%. Higher HbA(1c) levels were significantly associated with duration of diabetes, a number of drugs used, patient–physician relationship and knowledge about diabetes. The poor glycaemic control was significantly associated with low adherence of following the meal plan, regular medication and regular exercising (p<0.001). Among all the barriers, a too busy schedule for following the meal plan, taking medications and exercising regularly was significantly correlated with HbA1c levels. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed irregular meal plan (OR=5.27), irregular exercise (OR=2.25), number of medication used (OR= 0.19) and lesser extent patient–physician relationship (OR=2.68) were independent risk factors for poor glycaemic control. CONCLUSION: The poor glycaemic control was associated with poor adherence to self-care adherence and their barriers in our diabetic population. Integrated knowledge on diabetes management should be targeted to improve glycaemic control in our communities. Dove 2019-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6791337/ /pubmed/31632050 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S216842 Text en © 2019 Pokhrel et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Pokhrel, Sushant
Shrestha, Sneha
Timilsina, Alaska
Sapkota, Manisha
Bhatt, Mahendra Prasad
Pardhe, Bashu Dev
Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
title Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Self-Care Adherence And Barriers To Good Glycaemic Control In Nepalese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort self-care adherence and barriers to good glycaemic control in nepalese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a hospital-based cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6791337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632050
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S216842
work_keys_str_mv AT pokhrelsushant selfcareadherenceandbarrierstogoodglycaemiccontrolinnepalesetype2diabetesmellituspatientsahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT shresthasneha selfcareadherenceandbarrierstogoodglycaemiccontrolinnepalesetype2diabetesmellituspatientsahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT timilsinaalaska selfcareadherenceandbarrierstogoodglycaemiccontrolinnepalesetype2diabetesmellituspatientsahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT sapkotamanisha selfcareadherenceandbarrierstogoodglycaemiccontrolinnepalesetype2diabetesmellituspatientsahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT bhattmahendraprasad selfcareadherenceandbarrierstogoodglycaemiccontrolinnepalesetype2diabetesmellituspatientsahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT pardhebashudev selfcareadherenceandbarrierstogoodglycaemiccontrolinnepalesetype2diabetesmellituspatientsahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy